Like the Northwest Progressive Institute, the Washington Coalition for Police Accountability (WCPA) opposes Initiative 2113, which was certified to the Legislature by the Secretary of State on January 11th.
I‑2113 weakens Washington’s pursuit policy and puts all Washingtonians at increased risk of injury or death, with no real benefit to public safety.
Washington’s pursuit policy was adopted in 2021 after several years of rising fatalities from police chases. Pursuits had become the second leading cause of death from police activities, and over half of those killed were uninvolved bystanders, passengers, and officers. At the time, many jurisdictions in Washington, including Tacoma and Spokane, had restrictions on pursuits on the books because of the general recognition that pursuits are inherently dangerous and should be reserved for the most serious violations of criminal law.
The proponents of I‑2113 want to allow a pursuit for a violation of any law. This includes infractions, which are not crimes, like expired tabs, a cracked windshield, or tinted windows. Contrast that very broad approach with existing law, which is limited to pursuits for serious crimes against persons and DUIs.
To understand why this matters, we need to look no further than the death of Giovonn Joseph McDade, the son of co-author Sonia Joseph.
Giovonn was just twenty when he was shot by police at the conclusion of a pursuit that started because of expired tabs.
I‑2113 makes no distinction between an expired registration, a stolen car, or a shooting in terms of the type of offenses that can start a pursuit. The lack of specificity is the problem and why I‑2113 should not become law.
Let’s talk about the existing law on pursuits.
Has the existing law made Washington a “no pursuit” state? No.
Current state law allows pursuits, and if you follow the news you will see that law enforcement agencies continue to regularly use them across the state.
The wisdom of current law is that it is specific about what offenses allow police to start a pursuit – violent offenses (including a shooting, carjackings, armed robberies), sex offenses (including rape, child molestation, incest), DUIs, and prison escapes – but not misdemeanors or property crimes.
The current policy recognizes that the lives of bystanders, passengers, neighborhood residents, the driver, and the police, should be placed above using pursuits to enforce offenses like shoplifting, broken tail lights, and theft.
Has the existing pursuit policy reduced fatalities?
Yes — based on the data we have, fatalities have been reduced.
After Washington adopted a state-wide pursuit policy in 2021, pursuit-related fatalities in the state dropped by half. The law passed about two and a half years ago, and as more time elapses we will be able to see if these trends are sustained. The evidence to date shows the policy is working as intended. Law enforcement officers continue to use pursuits where there is a risk of imminent harm, but fewer people are getting killed.
In addition to fatalities, pursuits can cause other collateral damage such as traffic accidents, injuries, and property damage. Without additional data, we can’t see whether the policy has also reduced these harms. Washington state law does not have a requirement for pooling and analyzing the data that many law enforcement agencies are already collecting on pursuits. We need these data to get a complete picture of the damage and costs associated with police pursuits.
Has the pursuit policy led to an increase in crimes like motor vehicle theft? No.
There is ample evidence that, while these rates did rise, they rose for other reasons. Motor vehicle thefts have risen around the country, not just in our state, and the rise began during 2020, before our state enacted a pursuit policy in July 2021, which was revised last year. There is some consensus that the recent spike in vehicle thefts has been driven by a combination of COVID-related disruptions, which led to large increases in the prices of used cars, and the viral 2021 social media challenge that showed how to steal Kia and Hyundai cars with a USB drive.
And while the vehicle theft rate has risen here in Washington, this should be placed in historical context. Despite the recent spike, Washington’s motor vehicle theft rates are still lower than they were in 2005. It is also worth noting that in 2022, under the current pursuit policy, the Seattle Police Department reported that it recovered almost 70% of the stolen vehicles in their jurisdiction. The comparable national figure for stolen vehicle recoveries is 46%.
Our state policy aligns with the best practices for law enforcement recommended last year in a report on vehicular pursuits.
The report came from the nationally respected Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) and was published jointly with the Department of Justice and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. As the executive director of PERF wrote: “You can get a suspect another day, but you can’t get a life back.”
Initiative 2113 will drag the state backward, allowing pursuits for any violation of law. This will inevitably make the streets more dangerous for all of us, because high-speed vehicular pursuits put everyone – officers, uninvolved bystanders, drivers, passengers, neighbors, kids walking to school, and small-business owners and customers – at risk of injury and death. Existing law is saving lives – and we believe it could have saved the life of Giovonn.
We oppose I‑2113 because we know the harm it will cause and we don’t want it to happen to others. I‑2113 is too broad and Washingtonians deserve better.
About the authors
Sonia Joseph is the Board Chair of the Washington Coalition for Police Accountability, the founder and Executive Director of My Advocate, and the mother of Giovonn Joseph McDade who was killed by Kent Police in June 2017. Sonia serves as a commissioner on the Criminal Justice Training Commission.
Martina Morris is a member of the Washington Coalition for Police Accountability, and a retired professor of Statistics and Sociology from the University of Washington. She served as a member of the Washington State Attorney General’s advisory board on the design of the state’s use of force data collection program.