Offering daily news and analysis from the majestic Evergreen State and beyond, The Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigns as Chair of the Democratic National Committee

Embattled Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has announced that she will resign from her post once the Democratic National Convention has concluded, the party said in a statement today.

Wasserman Schultz, who also serves in the U.S. House of Representatives, has been under fire for some time from party leaders and activists unhappy with her management of the party.

Bernie Sanders has been calling for her resignation for weeks, and many of his supporters have been calling for her ouster for even longer than that.

It is worth noting that Wasserman Schultz was not chosen as DNC Chair in a competitive election by the members of the Democratic National Committee.

Rather, she was picked by President Obama’s advisors, who mistakenly thought she’d make a good successor to Tim Kaine when he stepped down to run for United States Senate in Virginia. Kaine is now Clinton’s running mate.

(The Democratic Party has a nonsensical tradition of allowing the White House to select the party chair when the presidency is held by a Democrat — a practice that I, in my capacity as a Democratic activist, am determined to abolish.)

From the beginning, Wasserman Schultz was an ineffective chair who could not get things done well, or at all. Her tenure has been marked by a series of electoral losses, fiascos, and setbacks for the party.

Under Wasserman Schultz, Democrats suffered massive losses in the 2014 midterms, missed out on earned media due to a poorly thought-out presidential debate schedule, had data stolen in a breach of the DNC’s computer systems, and needlessly engaged in multiple public feuds with the Sanders campaign (including over VoteBuilder access last December).

The party’s media outreach under Wasserman Schultz was also incredibly weak.

Many Democratic Party leaders believe Wasserman Schultz should have resigned or been forced out months ago, particularly when it became apparent she had lost the confidence and trust of her own vice chairs.

But inexplicably, she has remained in charge. Until now.

This weekend, Wasserman Schultz called President Obama, reportedly to offer her resignation. But it is not his to accept.

Wasserman Schultz is supposed to be the leader of a party that lives up to his name. The party grassroots has already been demanding Wasserman Schultz’s resignation for a long time. I don’t know a single Democratic activist who approves of her job performance. It is appropriate that she is finally listening.

POSTSCRIPT: Hillary Clinton, President Obama, and Vice President Joe Biden have all predictably issued statements thanking Wasserman Schultz for her service.

Clinton’s:

I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership.

There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie — which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.

Obama’s:

For the last eight years, Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has had my back. This afternoon, I called her to let her know that I am grateful. Her leadership of the DNC has meant that we had someone who brought Democrats together not just for my re-election campaign, but for accomplishing the shared goals we have had for our country.  Her critical role in supporting our economic recovery, our fights for social and civil justice and providing health care for all Americans will be a hallmark of her tenure as Party Chair.

Her fundraising and organizing skills were matched only by her passion, her commitment and her warmth.

And no one works harder for her constituents in Congress than Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Michelle and I are grateful for her efforts, we know she will continue to serve our country as a member of Congress from Florida and she will always be our dear friend.

Biden’s:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has had the President’s and my back over the last eight years—and we’re incredibly grateful.

She’s been part of our efforts to build an economy from the middle-out, to deliver quality, affordable health care to millions of Americans, and to protect equal rights for everyone.

Governing is serious business. The country deserves — and needs — serious leaders like Debbie.

A fighter for women’s health and rights. A fierce advocate for seniors and working families. A Congresswoman who knows her first job is serving her constituents—and her first obligation is always to her beautiful family—Steve, Jake, Rebecca, and Shelby. Debbie is an incredible public servant, and she will always be my friend.

Bernie Sanders had a very different take:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has made the right decision for the future of the Democratic Party. While she deserves thanks for her years of service, the party now needs new leadership that will open the doors of the party and welcome in working people and young people. The party leadership must also always remain impartial in the presidential nominating process, something which did not occur in the 2016 race.

Tim Canova, Wasserman Schultz’s Democratic primary challenger in Florida’s 23rd Congressional District, who is seeking to replace Schultz in Congress, said:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has resigned from the DNC and now it’s time for her to step up and debate me or drop out of our House race. Her interests lie not with her constituents, but rather in the interests of corrupt special interests groups and herself.

It’s time for a change in South Florida.

Wasserman Schultz will perform her final duties as Chair this week at the Convention, and then Donna Brazile will become the interim Chair.

It’s official: Hillary Clinton has chosen Virginia Senator Tim Kaine as her running mate

The ticket is complete:

Hillary Clinton named Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia to be her running mate Friday, selecting a battleground state politician with working-class roots and a fluency in Spanish, traits that she believes can bolster her chances to defeat Donald J. Trump in November.

Mrs. Clinton’s choice, which she announced via text message to supporters, came after her advisers spent months poring over potential vice-presidential candidates who could lift the Democratic ticket in an unpredictable race against Mr. Trump.

“I’m thrilled to announce my running mate, Tim Kaine, a man who’s devoted his life to fighting for others,” Clinton tweeted.

Kaine is a former governor who was elected to the United States Senate in 2012, succeeding Jim Webb, who left the Senate after serving only one term. (Webb was briefly a candidate for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination last year.) Prior to his Senate campaign, he also chaired the Democratic National Committee.

Ideologically speaking, Kaine isn’t the most progressive choice Clinton could have made, but he’s solid, at least. As of last year, Primary Colors had rated him a “Good Democrat” (their highest ranking), with an expected score of 89.6 and an actual score of 87.6. He has an overall lifetime score of 90.84% from ProgressivePunch and a crucial lifetime score of 70.37%.

Kaine’s stance on trade in particular is not likely to go over well with Bernie Sanders’ most committed supporters, but as Clinton is opposed to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, that will now have to become his position as well.

If he and Clinton win, Kaine will have to resign his U.S. Senate seat. Virginia, however, has a Democratic governor — Terry McAuliffe — so his immediate replacement would be a Democrat.

Kaine is expected to join Clinton on the campaign trail tomorrow.

More chaos at RNC as Ted Cruz refuses to endorse Donald Trump, gets booed off stage

So much for party unity:

Republican leaders attempted Wednesday to steer their national convention in a more substantive and unified direction behind GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, but their efforts came up against an eruption of lingering bitterness from the brutal primary campaign season.

The capstone of the evening was supposed to be a speech by Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, the newly named vice-presidential nominee. But the more riveting moment came earlier, when Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) pointedly refused to endorse Trump, who had bested him in the race for the nomination, and urged Republicans to “vote your conscience.”

Cruz’s decision not to get behind Trump angered Trump’s loyal delegates, who began loudly booing and shouting at him as he attempted to wrap up his speech.

You can see the spectacle for yourself courtesy of C-SPAN (at around the twenty minute mark, Trump’s backers begin to make their displeasure known):

Trump himself made his displeasure known by deliberately walking out into the hall just as Cruz was delivering the final lines of his speech, waving to his backers and giving them the thumbs up sign. The networks immediately pivoted away from Cruz to Trump’s planned retributive interruption, and while Cruz could still be heard speaking, viewers were seeing Trump onscreen instead.

Trump also belittled Cruz on Twitter.

“Wow, Ted Cruz got booed off the stage, didn’t honor the pledge! I saw his speech two hours early but let him speak anyway. No big deal!” Trump tweeted.

Uh huh.

The Clinton campaign, meanwhile, sent out an email neatly summarizing all of Cruz’s denunciations of Trump from earlier this year, saying it’s understandable that Cruz wouldn’t want to make an endorsement.

[T]o be fair, would you want to endorse a guy who threatened to “spill the beans” on your wife and accused your dad of maybe killing JFK? No, you’d probably say things like this:

  • Cruz: “Donald, you’re a sniveling coward.”
  • Cruz: “Donald does seem to have an issue with women. Donald doesn’t like strong women.”
  • Cruz: “Donald doesn’t do very well in foreign policy [because] he doesn’t have even a basic modicum of knowledge.”
  • Cruz: “Donald has had a long career of using great wealth and power trying to bully others.”
  • Cruz said Trump was “engaging in demagoguery.”
  • Cruz: “Of course it’s inappropriate to be attacking a federal judge’s race or ethnicity”
  • Cruz: “Donald’s campaign, his entire campaign is built on a lie.”

Ouch!

The Seattle Times’ Jim Brunner reports that after Cruz’s speech, he had an encounter with Washington State Republican Party Chair Susan Hutchison, who has ingloriously turned into one of Trump’s biggest local boosters:

Hutchison ran into Cruz, the former Trump rival for the Republican presidential nomination, near an elevator at the Quicken Loans Arena.

She said she told him his speech was “inexcusable” and called him a “traitor to the party.”

The encounter was awkward given that Washington’s delegation is stacked with Cruz supporters.

It wasn’t all that long ago that Susan Hutchison wanted to lead King County, the state’s largest jurisdiction. Nowadays, though, Hutchison feels contempt for King County — and Seattle in particular — because it’s a Democratic bastion:

When state GOP chairman Susan Hutchison announced Washington’s votes for Trump in the traditional roll call of the states Tuesday, she talked about wheat fields, volcanoes and Boeing planes.

She didn’t mention the Space Needle, the Seahawks or any other reference to the state’s biggest city.

That was no accident, Hutchison told delegates at Wednesday’s breakfast meeting.

“I specifically left out Seattle this year,” she said, citing the state’s “massive Democratic votes” year after year. “It’s just time for the people of the rest of the state to recognize how important they are.”

Huh?

It’s ironic that Hutchison has been engaging in so much Seattle-bashing lately, considering it’s the place she calls home. She and her family live in Laurelhurst, which is one of the more affluent neighborhoods in the city. They evidently like our state’s largest city enough to live there in spite of its progressive politics.

Hutchison’s petty, silly diatribes against Seattle are misplaced. Seattle and King County aren’t the reason why Democrats consistently win statewide contests, for they can be outvoted. It’s counties like Snohomish, cities like Bellingham, and coastal communities like Port Townsend or Aberdeen that have delivered Washington for Democratic candidates time and again.

King County’s turnout as a whole has actually been known to lag behind the statewide average, especially in midterm and odd numbered years.

However, it picks up in presidential years (as does turnout in many swing counties west of the Cascades), driven in part by Democratic get out the vote efforts.

Seattle trash talk may feel therapeutic for the militant right wing Republicans who view the city as an obstacle in the way of their schemes to turn Washington into the next Wisconsin, but it’s not going to broaden their party’s appeal.

The things Seattelites want are the same things that Washingtonians from every corner of the state want: great public schools, equality for all, safe neighborhoods, broad prosperity, fair taxes, clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and the protection of our wild and majestic places for future generations.

Republicans’ past attempts to pit suburban and rural voters against Seattle voters have ended in failure, but they haven’t seem to have learned much of anything from those experiences. Their bitterness is showing.

Did Melania Trump plagiarize from First Lady Michelle Obama’s speech at the 2008 DNC?

It sure looks that way:

In her first major address before the nation on Monday night, Melania Trump appears to have plagiarized a number of lines from first lady Michelle Obama’s speech at the 2008 Democratic National Convention. The plagiarized passages, in bold below, concerned the importance of hard work and honesty.

“From a young age, my parents impressed on me the values that you work hard for what you want in life; that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise; that you treat people with respect,” Trump told the thousands of Republican delegates and assembled media on Monday night in Cleveland.

In 2008, Mrs. Obama said, “You work hard for what you want in life; that your word is your bond and you do what you say you’re going to do; that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don’t know them, and even if you don’t agree with them.”

Trump’s spouse also lifted a line about children from Michelle Obama, saying, “We want our children in this nation to know that the only limit to your achievements is the strength of your dreams and your willingness to work for them.” 

In 2008, Michelle Obama said, “We want our children — and all children in this nation — to know that the only limit to the height of your achievements is the reach of your dreams and your willingness to work for them.”

Emphasis is HuffPost’s.

The Trump campaign has been in damage control mode over this scandal all morning long, beginning with a 2 AM statement by a communications aide who admitted that “fragments” of other speeches were incorporated into Melania’s.

Top Trump operative Paul Manafort later insisted that Melania Trump had written the speech herself (a claim so silly that even other Trump surrogates are refusing to repeat it), lamely arguing that it was an original composition.

“What she did was use words that are common words,” Manafort told CNN. “To think that she would do something like that, knowing how scrutinized her speech was going to be last night, is just really absurd.”

Absurd — and yet it happened. As Jarrett Hill said on Twitter, a “whole graph” of Michelle Obama’s speech appears to have been plagiarized.

And there’s more. Former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau pointed out: “Sarah Hurwitz, Michelle’s head speechwriter, used to be Hillary’s. So the Trump campaign plagiarized from a Hillary speechwriter.”

Ironic, isn’t it?

Speeches can certainly have similarities to other speeches, including the use of the same words and phrases. But in this instance, multiple lines in close proximity were lifted, with only a few changes being made to each of the copied passages, and no attribution to the original source. That’s plagiarism.

How did this happen? Well, one plausible scenario is that somebody involved in putting the speech together decided to go read or watch remarks given in the past by candidates’ spouses at national conventions, found Michelle Obama’s much-lauded speech from 2008 in Denver, and used a transcript of it to jumpstart or enhance a draft of Melania Trump’s speech.

The copied lines should have been detected and scrubbed when the draft was proofed or checked, but evidently such controls weren’t in place.

RNC Chair Reince Priebus said this morning that he would “probably” fire the person responsible for preparing the speech, were it his decision.

Perhaps Trump’s right hand man Paul Manafort doesn’t want to do so because the person responsible — Rick Gates — is a buddy of his.

Hillary Clinton commits to introducing amendment to overturn Citizens United

In a video address to Netroots Nation 2016, played during tonight’s closing plenary session in St. Louis, presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton committed to introducing a constitutional amendment to overturn the Roberts Court’s horrible Citizens United ruling within her first one hundred days in office.

“Today I’m announcing that in my first thirty days as President, I will propose a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and give the American people — all of us — the chance to reclaim our democracy,” Clinton said, drawing loud applause and cheers from the convention hall.

The video message, prepared by Clinton’s campaign and narrated entirely by Clinton, lavished praise on Bernie Sanders, the favored Democratic presidential candidate of most Netroots Nation attendees. It depicted scenes of Sanders campaigning by himself as well as with Clinton, as Clinton paid tribute to the dedication and tireless efforts of Sanders supporters.

Clinton also used her address to briefly talk about the need to eradicate systemic racism from the criminal justice system, in a nod to the predominant theme of this year’s gathering of Netroots Nation. Her campaign has already announced that many mothers of innocent black people killed by police will be featured speakers at the Democratic National Convention later this month.

Here is a transcript of Clinton’s remarks:

Hello Netroots Nation! Thanks for putting progressive issues front and center in this election and every election for more than a decade, and thanks to for shining a spotlight on the urgent pressing challenge of criminal justice reform.

It’s been nearly two years since Michael Brown was killed in Ferguson. With the help of activists including those in the Black Lives Matter movement our country is truly engaged in a difficult but critical conversation about systemic racism and injustice but now we need to turn talked into action.

Last week’s tragedies only underscore the urgency of end-to-end criminal justice reform and stopping the tragedy of black men and women and black children being killed by police or dying in custody. I’ve laid out a comprehensive reform agenda; now I’m proposing two additional steps.

First, as President, I’ll bring law enforcement and communities together to develop national guidelines on the use of force.

Second, I will target one billion dollars in my first budget to take on implicit bias which remains a problem across our society and even in the best of our police departments.

I’m proud that for the first time the Democratic platform addresses these issues in a comprehensive way, and that we have developed the most progressive platform in our Party’s history.

Now, I know many of the people in this room supported Senator Sanders in the primary. I’m looking forward to hearing from you, learning from you and working with you.

You’ve helped put political and campaign finance reform at the top of the national agenda, and I intend to keep it there.

Today I’m announcing that in my first thirty days as President I will propose a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and give the American people — all of us — the chance to reclaim our democracy.

I will also appoint Supreme Court justices who understand that this decision was a disaster for our democracy, and I will fight for other progressive reforms including small dollar matching and disclosure requirements.

I hope some of the brilliant minds in this room will seek out cases to challenge citizens united in the courts because I know I can’t do this alone. We need you to keep speaking out keep organizing and keep holding elected officials — including me — accountable.

We know what happens when progressive voices get drowned out by the other side, and we cannot let that happen, so I’m looking forward to fighting alongside you and with Senator Sanders in the weeks months and years to come because you know what we are stronger together. Thank you all very much.

This is great news. Our thanks to Hillary Clinton for committing to explicitly offer a constitutional amendment to stop the flood of big money in elections unleashed by the most disastrous decision of the Roberts Court.

However, we do need more than an amendment that merely reverses that decision. We need an amendment that states that corporations are not people and money is not speech. There are other Supreme Court decisions that also need to be overturned, so that our democracy can endure.

Ruth Woo: 1926-2016

Editor’s Note: Respected and widely beloved Seattle community activist Ruth Woo died this week at the age of eighty-nine.

News of her passing has sparked an outpouring of tributes.

Over many, many years, Ruth Woo was a wonderful friend and mentor to countless Washingtonians. She was a trusted leader with a remarkable talent for bringing people together. Ruth was generous with her time, her ideas and advice,” said Washington State Governor Jay Inslee.

“She was motivated not by fame or access to power, but by a contagious belief that we could always do more to make this a better place to live. She had a remarkable ability to create and connect communities, a talent that helped advance the cause of civil rights,” said King County Executive Dow Constantine.

NPI’s Gael Tarleton was among those who knew Ruth Woo. What follows are her reflections on the wise and wonderful person Ruth was. 

So many people called her Auntie — I just called her Ruth.

We lost a great woman this week.

Ruth Woo never worked in the spotlight. She’d hold court at Bush Gardens in the International District, in her favorite booth. I never would have known her if I hadn’t run for office. When I decided to run for the Seattle Port Commission in 2007, several people told me to call Ruth Woo. I left her voice mails to introduce myself. But I didn’t speak to her until October, just a month before the election.

She asked me a few questions about the years I worked in Russia. Then she said “I’m going to endorse you. Don’t let me down.”

In the years that followed, I’d call her to talk about the politics of the Port. She always had a fascination with the Port of Seattle. She understood the role of trade. But more than anything, she couldn’t believe so few women ever ran for Port Commissioner. That’s when I realized Ruth Woo fought many fights in her life, but one of those fights was getting more women elected to local and state offices.

She wanted more women of color to choose to enter politics too. And for her, that meant becoming a confidante. She was a safe and trusted advisor with a keenly tuned ear to the political fault lines every elected official steps into.

So few women take the time to mentor women who choose to enter the political arena. Here was Ruth Woo, who lived eighty-nine years, and who devoted more than half her life to helping women and people of color win and then guided them as they navigated into the world of elected office. She was intimidating, encouraging, candid, and wise. Ruth Woo did it her way. We’re so lucky she chose our community to make her home and make a difference. She is now at peace.

2016 DNC primetime speaking lineup unveiled; Bernie Sanders gets Monday slot

In the wake of Donald Trump’s vice presidential selection announcement, the Democratic National Convention Committee (DNCC) has unveiled the speaking lineup for the 2016 DNC, which will take place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, following the Republican National Convention in Cleveland next week.

“While Republican leadership continues to run away from Donald Trump, and refuse to participate in the upcoming Republican convention, the Democratic convention will showcase enormously popular national leaders, rising stars from across the country and a diverse range of everyday Americans who will inspire the nation,” read an announcement from the DNCC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Here’s a preview of each night’s speaking lineup and theme:

Monday: United Together
Featuring First Lady Michelle Obama, Senator Bernie Sanders and DREAMer Astrid Silva
Gavel time expected at 3:00 PM

Monday will focus on putting the future of American families front and center and how we’re stronger together when we build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top and when everyone has a chance to live up to their God-given potential. DREAMer Astrid Silva will share her story and her fight to keep families together.

Tuesday: A Lifetime of Fighting for Children and Families
Featuring President Bill Clinton and Mothers of the Movement
Gavel time expected at 4:00 PM

Tuesday will feature the roll call vote and how Hillary has spent her entire career working to make a difference for children, families, and our country. The Mothers of the Movement participating include Gwen Carr, Mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, Mother of Trayvon Martin; Maria Hamilton, Mother of Dontré Hamilton; Lucia McBath, Mother of Jordan Davis; Lezley McSpadden, Mother of Michael Brown; Cleopatra Pendleton-Cowley, Mother of Hadiya Pendleton; Geneva Reed-Veal, Mother of Sandra Bland.

Wednesday: Working Together
Featuring President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden
Gavel time expected at 4:30 PM

On Wednesday speakers will take an in-depth look at just how high the stakes are in this election and how Hillary has the experience and steadiness to bring people together to tackle the big challenges and get real results.

Thursday: Stronger Together
Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton
Gavel time expected at 4:30 PM

On the final day of the convention, Hillary will speak about her vision for our country – her belief that we are stronger together and that America is at its best when we work together to solve our problems.

No speaking role has yet been announced for Elizabeth Warren.

But Warren fans shouldn’t panic — additional speakers are going to be announced in the coming days and she is almost certain to have a speaking role, although what that role is will depend on whether or not she is chosen as Clinton’s running mate. (Were she not being considered, she’d probably already be on the list.)

In 2012, Warren was billed as the warmup speaker for Bill Clinton, although in our view, her remarks were just as compelling as his.

Netroots Nation 2017 to be held in Atlanta

Next year’s Netroots Nation Convention will be held in Atlanta, Georgia thirteen months from now, organizers have announced.

“For the first time ever, we’re headed to the South for Netroots Nation,” they wrote in a post revealing their site selection. “Our twelfth annual conference will be held in Atlanta [from] August 10-13, 2017.”

“Some progressives like to write off the South, but justice and equality will never be fully achieved in the United States without progressive movements winning there,” the announcement added. “There are some amazing groups and activists on the ground fighting every day, and we’ll be there to amplify the work happening not just in Atlanta and Georgia, but throughout the South.”

If you are interested in registering early, you may do so here through Eventbrite.

This will be just the third Netroots Nation held in August, and, as mentioned, the first in the South and the twelfth overall. Here’s a history of the conference:

 

  • June 8th-11th, 2006 (as YearlyKos): Las Vegas, Nevada
  • August 2nd-5th, 2007 (as YearlyKos): Chicago, Illinois
  • July 17th-20th, 2008: Austin, Texas
  • August 13th-19th, 2009: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • July 22nd-25th, 2010: Las Vegas, Nevada
  • June 16th-19th, 2011: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • June 7th-10th, 2012: Providence, Rhode Island
  • June 20th-23rd, 2013: San Jose, California
  • July 17th-21st, 2014: Detroit, Michigan
  • July 14th-17th, 2015: St. Louis, Missouri

Las Vegas holds the notable distinction as the only city to have hosted the convention more than once. The westernmost city to have hosted NN to date is San Jose, the easternmost is Providence, and the city closest to the geographic center of the Lower 48 to have hosted is this year’s choice — St. Louis.

 

Bernie Sanders endorses Hillary Clinton

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders made his first joint appearance with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in Portsmouth, New Hampshire today, declaring that he intends to do everything he can to help Clinton win in November, and ensure that Donald Trump is defeated.

Sanders used his endorsement speech to draw as many contrasts between Clinton and Trump as he could, pointing out that Trump, who is unprepared and unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief, would drag the country backward if he were elected. Trump “would be a disaster for our country and our planet,” Sanders said.

He touted the areas where he and Clinton are in agreement, from education to healthcare to fighting the climate crisis to reducing big money in politics.

“It is no secret that Hlillary Clinton and I disagree on a number of issues… that is what democracy about,” Sanders said, going on to praise his delegates and Clinton’s delegates for working hard together recently to produce “the most progressive platform” the Democratic Party has ever seen.

“Our job now is to see that platform implemented by a Democratically-controlled Senate, a Democratically-controlled House, and a Hillary Clinton presidency…. I intend to be in every corner of this country to make certain this happens.”

Clinton nodded and occasionally clapped as Sanders spoke.

“Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding President, and I am proud to stand with her today,” Sanders said, concluding his speech.

UPDATE: Hillary Clinton has now spoken as well. She delivered a powerful speech praising Sanders’ campaign, thanking his supporters for their efforts to go all out for Bernie, and embracing many of the causes that Sanders’ campaign was about.

This speech showed just how effective and important Sanders’ campaign has been. Bernie Sanders and the millions of people who supported him have made Hillary Clinton’s campaign bolder, more progressive, and more attuned to the needs of the people. Today’s unity event was proof that Sanders’ influence is being felt in a big way. Clinton did an effective job of linking arms with Sanders and calling for unity in her speech, again and again promoting and reinforcing ideas rooted in the core progressive values of empathy and responsibility.

Read More »

It’s official: Attorney General Ferguson has a second case against Tim Eyman to prosecute

A complaint alleging that Tim Eyman failed to follow Washington’s public disclosure law back in April when he launched an ad campaign excoriating Democratic lawmakers for not doing his bidding has been returned to Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s office for further action by a unanimous Public Disclosure Commission.

In an early afternoon teleconference, Commissioners Anne Levinson, John Bridges, Katrina Asay, and Jack Johnson heard a presentation from PDC compliance officer Tony Perkins summarizing the staff’s findings. Staff determined that there were “multiple apparent violations” of RCW 42.17A and recommended that the Public Disclosure Commission refer the matter to Ferguson’s office. The Commission accepted the recommendation with a unanimous vote.

This is the second time in the past twelve months that the PDC has finished investigating a complaint against Tim Eyman and concluded he broke the law.

The first time was last September, when the Commission heard a staff report documenting a number of egregious violations (including concealment) and voted unanimously to refer the matter to Ferguson with a request that his office initiate a broader, more expansive follow-up investigation.

Ferguson promptly proceeded to do just that, but Eyman and his associates Roy Ruffino and Eddie Agazarm refused to cooperate, leaving the AG’s office with no choice but to go to court to get their subpoenas enforced. Judges in Snohomish and Thurston County Superior Courts last month signed orders compelling Eyman and his cohorts’ cooperation. They have until next Wednesday to turn over bank statements, tax returns, and other statements sought by Ferguson’s office.

The complaint acted on by the PDC today began as a forty-five day citizen action notice filed by Washingtonians For Ethical Government (WFEG), of which I am a boardmember. RCW Chapter 42.17A provides that a citizen or group of citizens may bring an enforcement action on behalf of the state if they believe that public disclosure law has been violated. Upon receiving the notice, Attorney General Ferguson asked the PDC to investigate the matter and determine if the law was violated. Having now done so, the PDC is sending the matter back to Ferguson.

Prior to the PDC’s vote, Commission Chair Anne Levinson engaged in a dialogue with staff about the case, noting that the Attorney General already has one open case against Eyman, and expressing a concern that Eyman is dodging disclosure requirements in order to exploit Washington’s initiative process for personal profit.

“This case seems to also raise whether there’s a concern about people using the initiative process potentially for self-advantage,” she said, “that, by filing a number of different initiatives — whether they actually have an intention to run [one of them], to collect signatures, or to successfully get it on the ballot — seems to allow for raising of quite a bit of money, potentially transferring, or co-mingling, or using money for different purposes than for which it was ostensibly raised.”

“It’s not clear to me that the rules and statutes which we normally rely on sufficiently address this,” she added.

“One might also ask whether this is the sort of activity that should require these officers to not continually file different committees, but to be a continuing political committee that has regular reporting obligations, given the patterns here, of expenditures and soliciting of dollars, and sort of affiliated committee structures… It’s concerning to me, so I wonder if that’s the case for my colleagues or staff, and if we might need to use this to do some further thinking about how to address this so that there is more transparency for the public.”

As it so happens, the PDC may be asked within days by Ferguson’s office to launch yet another probe to ascertain whether Tim Eyman and three of the committees he controls are breaking the law by failing to report on the status of loans received by the committees, and also failing to report interest from what are apparently a set of loans made on extremely generous terms as in-kind contributions.

Keep Washington Rolling, which NPI worked with to defeat Initiatives 912 and 1125, notified Ferguson’s office last month with its own set of forty-five day notices that it intends to bring a lawsuit against Eyman in superior court over these additional violations unless Ferguson’s office strikes first.

Should the PDC find even more “apparent violations”, it could result in Ferguson’s office landing a third case against Tim Eyman — all in the span of a year.

And that would be fitting. Eyman’s misdeeds are finally catching up to him.

As has been noted many times here, Eyman is a serial public disclosure law violator with a long history of sloppy reporting, delinquent filing, and concealment. Many PDC complaints have been filed against him over the years, with some resulting in penalties, but Eyman’s behavior hasn’t changed. It’s only gotten worse.

Perhaps Eyman’s legal problems, coupled with the smackdown of Initiative 1366 in the courts, have given his wealthy benefactors pause.

So far this year, they have chosen not to supply him with the megabucks required for a successful signature drive. As a result, the two initiatives Eyman said he was going to qualify for the 2016 ballot earlier this year never got off the ground, putting Eyman in an incredibly awkward and embarrassing position.

Nor is there any sign that they have turned on the money spigot to jumpstart I-869, the initiative Eyman now claims to be doing to the 2017 Legislature. The clock is ticking — there’s now less than six months to go before 2016 ends. If Eyman doesn’t have more than 300,000 signatures by around Christmastime, then his latest scheme — perhaps scam would be a better word — won’t make it.

Not having to fight another malicious government-wrecking scheme from Eyman this year is a huge blessing, but that’s how it should be every year.

We urge Attorney General Bob Ferguson to hold Eyman accountable for his unabashed lawbreaking. We will continue to do all we can to bring about a future for Washington that is free from Eyman’s destructive initiatives and toxic politics.

VICTORY!!! I-1515 backers throw in the towel, anti-transgender initiative FAILS!

Backers of Initiative 1515, a right wing scheme to legalize discrimination against transgender individuals in Washington State, have canceled their appointment to turn in signatures after concluding they didn’t have enough to make the ballot, the Secretary of State’s office announced only minutes ago.

“The I-1515 (‘bathroom initiative’) campaign has canceled their Friday appointment and will not be bringing in signatures,” said David Ammons, communications director for Washington Secretary of State Kim Wyman. “Campaign chief Joseph Backholm contacted our Elections Division and indicated the campaign did not gather enough signatures to meet the threshold (246k bare minimum and 325k suggested level to cover duplicate and invalid signatures.)”

“This evening we made the difficult decision to cancel tomorrow morning’s meeting with the Secretary of State,” said I-1515 sponsor Joseph Backholm in an email to backers. “Despite a tremendous and humbling effort from our faithful core of volunteers, as of 4:30 PM, we did not have enough signatures to reasonably believe we will meet the required 246,000 quota to get I-1515 on the ballot.”

This is a huge, huge victory. With Tim Eyman having already failed to qualify anything, the demise of I-1515 means that for the first time in decades, there will be no right wing initiatives on Washington’s statewide ballot.

Washington’s progressive movement, meanwhile, will have not just one, not just two, but several initiatives on the statewide ballot.

For example, I-1433, which would raise the minimum wage to $13.50 and require most employers to provide paid leave to their workers.

Or I-1491, which would save lives and empower families by allowing courts to issue extreme risk protection orders barring individuals who the evidence shows are a danger to themselves or others from accessing firearms.

Or I-735, which puts Washington on record as calling for a federal constitutional amendment holding that corporations are not people and money is not speech.

The right wing may try to qualify a measure similar to I-1515 for the 2017 ballot, so we must remain vigilant and ready to protect hard-won LGBT civil rights. But for now, the Washington Won’t Discriminate campaign has won a huge victory. Together, we stood up to bigotry and educated voters about the grave harm I-1515 would cause. That helped frustrate the campaign’s signature gathering effort. They’ve now thrown in the towel. This is truly a great day for Washington State.

UPDATE, 6:45 PM: Seth Kirby, Chair of Washington Won’t Discriminate, has responded to the failure of I-1515. Here’s Seth’s message to supporters:

After months of deceptive campaigning, in which we’ve undoubtedly witnessed numerous reports of inflated I-1515 signature counts—the campaign to repeal transgender protections is officially retreating.

That means that Washington’s non-discrimination laws, which have been protecting transgender Washingtonians and their families for more than a decade, will stay on the books—and continue to protect our neighbors and friends for years to come.

Today’s remarkable victory is testament to the fact that, in Washington, discrimination will NOT stand. I am proud to live and work in a state where people know that everyone—including transgender Washingtonians—deserves to be treated fairly and equally under the law. And we stand by those convictions to the very end.

The evidence is overwhelming. In a matter of mere months we mobilized thousands of grassroots supporters and united an unprecedented coalition of transgender Washingtonians and their families, more than 150 businesses, hundreds of faith leaders, education advocates and more behind the simple notion that discrimination has no place in our state.

When we asked you to stand up to proponents of transgender discrimination and say No On I-1515, you delivered 110%—and today it paid off, BIG time. In short: This campaign would not have been possible without fair-minded and committed supporters like you.

And as a transgender Washingtonian—who would have been very directly impacted by a potential repeal of our non-discrimination laws—I can’t thank you enough for standing with us in defense of fairness and equality for all.

We will keep you posted as we decide where this campaign goes next. For now, celebrations are in order!

And here’s the campaign’s press release.

This post will be updated with additional information in the hours to come.

Tim Eyman broke the law with ad campaign against Democratic legislators, PDC confirms

Initiative profiteer Tim Eyman has once against been busted for serious violations of Washington State’s public disclosure laws.

Staff at the Public Disclosure Commission — Washington’s equivalent of the Federal Elections Commission — have finished investigating a complaint filed by NPI partner Washingtonians For Ethical Government several weeks ago which alleges that Eyman and his associates violated RCW 42.17A when they launched a series of ads against the majority of Washington State’s Democratic lawmakers in April.

Their verdict? Eyman and his associates broke the law. Again.

RCW Chapter 42.17A requires that any person or entity that independently spends at least $1,000 supporting or opposing any candidate for state/local office report the expenditure to the PDC, and identify its target. Independent expenditure advertising must also contain certain disclosures, including the statement, “No candidate authorized this ad. It is paid for by (name, city, state)”.

When Eyman decided to launch an ad campaign attacking the Democratic lawmakers who defied his demands for a constitutional amendment to sabotage our state’s majority vote requirement for legislation, he failed to follow the rules, once again demonstrating his contempt for our citizen-created campaign finance laws.

The ads collectively cost $45,318, and appear to have financed principally by Eyman’s wealthy benefactors Clyde Holland and Kenneth Fisher, who each donated $22,500 to the Eyman-controlled PAC that paid for the ads to be produced.

A few weeks following the launch of the ads, after Eyman had failed to take any corrective action, Washingtonians For Ethical Government (which I sit on the board of) notified Attorney General Bob Ferguson and King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg of its intent to bring a lawsuit against Eyman on behalf of the state if they did not commence action against Eyman within fifty-five days.

Ferguson’s office referred the matter to the Public Disclosure Commission and the PDC opened an investigation. Around the same time, Eyman took down the ads and their accompanying website. Now it appears the PDC will be sending the matter back to Ferguson with a request to prosecute. Here’s the PDC staff’s findings:

Investigative Findings and Conclusion

Based on the factors identified in the investigation, staff found and concluded as follows:

Bring Back Our $30 Car Tabs – VMWC – 2016 filed a C-4 Summary, Full Report of Receipts and Expenditures on April 11, 2016, disclosing more than $45,000 in expenditures paid in March of 2016 to sponsor 21 Web videos that opposed 49 candidates for state legislative office. The initial C-4 did not disclose that the purpose of the expenditures was to oppose a candidate for office, as required by RCW 42.17A.240(6) and WAC 390-16-037(1), and did not describe the expenses as independent expenditures. That purpose and description was first disclosed 44 days late, on an amended C-4 report filed on May 25, 2016.

Based on the pro-rated value of these communications per candidate, it appears that ten of the 21 videos at issue met the statutory definition of “independent expenditure.” Per RCW 42.17A.320(4) these ten videos were required to include the “No candidate authorized this ad” disclaimer; the sponsor’s name, city and state; and accurate “Top 5 contributors” information.

The sponsor ID statement in the videos contained an abbreviated version of the sponsor’s name (“Voters Want More Choices”) but did not contain the committee’s city or state. The videos also did not include the statement “No candidate authorized this ad.” Finally, the videos listed incorrect “Top 5 Contributors” information.

C-1pc Political Committee Registrations currently on file for Bring Back Our $30 Car Tabs – VMWC – 2016 indicate the committee’s sole purpose is to support Initiative 1421 in the 2016 general election. The committee’s C-1pc registrations do not identify any candidate that the committee will support or oppose.

Although the issue was not raised in the Citizen Action Notice, within ten days of sponsoring the committee’s March 28, 2016 expenditures to oppose a candidate, or to support a ballot proposition other than I-1421, Bring Back Our $30 Car Tabs – VMWC – 2016 was required under RCW 42.17A.205(4) to file an amended C-1pc indicating the committee’s updated purpose. This amendment, due no later than April 7, 2016, is 89 days late as of the date of this executive summary.

Finally, in their Citizen Action Notice, the complainants did not make a specific allegation concerning any alleged failure by Bring Back Our $30 Car Tabs – VMWC – 2016 to file C-6 Independent Expenditure reports. Nevertheless, PDC staff reviewed a possible C-6 filing requirement for the political committee, and found no such requirement under any of the relevant statutory provisions: RCW 42.17A.255, RCW 42.17A.260, and RCW 42.17A.305.

Recommendation

For the reasons described above, staff recommends that the Commission find multiple apparent violations of RCW 42.17A.205, RCW 42.17A.240, and RCW 42.17A.320, and recommend to the Washington Attorney General that that office take appropriate action concerning the apparent failure of Bring Back Our $30 Car Tabs – VWMC – 2016 and its officers Tim Eyman, Jack Fagan, Mike Fagan, and Barbara Smith to supplement the committee’s political committee registration by disclosing updated information, its failure to disclose expenses incurred to oppose candidates for legislative office in a complete and timely manner, and its failure to include complete and accurate sponsor identification and contributor information in the committee’s independent expenditure political advertising.

The Public Disclosure Commission is slated to hear the above-excerpted staff report at a meeting this Friday, where it will likely vote to accept the recommendation to send the matter to Attorney General Bob Ferguson for further action.

Ferguson’s office is already investigating Eyman for serious violations of RCW 42.17A committed during the last presidential election cycle in 2012, and attempting to ascertain if the law was violated during other time periods. Judges in Snohomish and Thurston Superior Courts have signed off on orders requested by the Attorney General to enforce subpoenas issued months ago as part of that investigation, which Tim Eyman and his associates were refusing to comply with.

Eyman and company have until next Wednesday to turn over the documents the Attorney General wants. If they don’t, they could be held in contempt of court.

Within a few days, it looks like the AG will have a second set of Chapter 42.17A violations committed by Eyman to prosecute. And there could be more on the way.

Eyman is in unquestionably in a world of legal trouble — and deservedly so.

For far too long, Eyman has operated as though the law simply doesn’t apply to him. He has been active in Washington politics for about two decades now, and he should know what the rules are and how to follow them. He also has the money to afford a first-rate treasurer. Yet his pattern of incomplete reporting, delinquent filing, concealment, and sloppy recordkeeping has continued unabated.

Eyman’s contempt for our public disclosure laws cannot be tolerated. It’s time for Eyman and his associates to be held accountable and to pay a steep price for their lawbreaking. We commend the staff of the Public Disclosure Commission for swiftly wrapping up this investigation and for recommending this matter be referred to Attorney General Bob Ferguson for further action.

NRA can expect another defeat this fall: NPI poll finds massive support for I-1491 in WA

The National Rifle Association and the gun lobby arrayed around it may have a lot of influence in Congress and state legislatures around the country, including Washington’s, but an overwhelming majority of voters in the Evergreen State are ready to stand up to them and once again vote to strengthen gun safety laws, a recent survey conducted for the Northwest Progressive Institute has found.

In November of 2014, the people of Washington memorably defied the NRA and voted for universal background checks on gun sales with I-594. That law remains in place today. But there is more we can do to prevent gun violence.

That’s why, for the last few months, the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility has been working to qualify I-1491 to the ballot. I-1491, which NPI supports, is based on legislation that didn’t make it out of the statehouse in Olympia, and would give judges the authority to temporarily bar a person from accessing firearms.

Here’s how it would work:

Extreme Risk Protection Orders are modeled on our well-established systems of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Protection Orders with careful protections for due process and standards for evidence. After a family member files a petition, the court holds a hearing and determines whether the person poses a serious threat of violence to themselves or others. The judge can issue an order restricting access to firearms for up to one year and can also refer the person in crisis for evaluation to ensure they get the help they need.

Once a petition is filed, the court notifies the subject and a hearing is held. If the evidence of a threat is upheld by a judge, the order is put in place for one year and can be renewed annually should circumstances warrant. The subject may request one hearing a year to rescind the order. Violation of the order carries a criminal penalty.

Last month, on NPI’s behalf, Public Policy Polling asked a sample of likely Washington voters how they would vote on I-1491 if the election were being held now. Voters were read the ballot title (which is how I-1491 will be presented on the ballot) and asked to respond. Here’s the wording of the question and the answers:

There will be a measure on Washington’s November 2016 ballot called Initiative 1491. The description reads as follows: Initiative Measure No. 1491 concerns court-issued extreme risk protection orders temporarily preventing access to firearms. This measure would allow police, family, or household members to obtain court orders temporarily preventing firearms access by persons exhibiting mental illness, violent or other behavior indicating they may harm themselves or others. If the election were being held now, would you definitely vote yes, probably vote yes, probably vote no, or definitely vote no on Initiative 1491?

  • Yes: 73%
    • Definitely vote yes: 56%
    • Probably vote yes: 17%
  • No: 21%
    • Probably vote no: 11%
    • Definitely vote no: 10%
  • Not sure: 5%

This survey of 679 likely Washington State voters was in the field from June 14th-15th, 2016; all respondents participated via landline. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.8% at the 95% confidence level.

The overall “Yes” figure is certainly impressive (73%!), but what really stands out is that an outright majority of voters fall into the Definitely vote yes camp. That 56% number suggests that most Washingtonians are very enthusiastic about I-1491.

Many initiatives start out of the gate with good topline numbers, but their support can be shallow… a mile wide and an inch deep, as the old adage goes. Our research suggests that the campaign to pass I-1491 does not have that problem.

The NRA and the gun lobby will probably mount a vocal NO campaign. But as we proved in 2014, the NRA and the gun lobby can be defeated at the ballot. Gun violence is preventable, and with smart, strong, and effective laws like I-1491, we can save lives and expand freedom for all.

The United States Declaration of Independence, adopted two hundred and forty years ago by the Continental Congress, memorably declares, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” These important and inspiring words have resonated with Americans throughout our country’s history. Generations of progressive activists have tirelessly worked to expand freedom to make these words less hollow and more meaningful for their children and their children’s children.

Previous generations succeeded in abolishing legalized slavery, outlawing oppressive child labor, and advancing civil rights for minorities. We now have an opportunity to build on the progress they have made. Our country faces a gun violence epidemic that threatens all of the unalienable rights explicitly mentioned in the United States Declaration of Independence. If we truly believe in the idea that every one of us has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, then we need to act to protect lives from being cruelly and unnecessarily cut short by gun violence.

I-1491 is no panacea, but it will make our communities safer, especially in conjunction with I-594 and other needed reforms.

Contrary to what the gun lobby says, stronger gun safety laws do work — the experience of other countries teaches us this. We do not have to accept routine mass slaughters as a grim reality in this country. With sensible laws like I-1491, we can do a better job of looking out for and protecting each other from harm, while still allowing responsible, law-abiding citizens to bear arms.

The Declaration of Independence, two hundred and forty years later

In accordance with tradition, we are reposting the text of the Declaration of Independence here on The Cascadia Advocate for your enjoyment. The Declaration was primarily authored by our third president, Thomas Jefferson, who drew heavily on the thinking of Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke to persuasively lay out the case for the independence of the United States.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

The Declaration of Independence, by John Trumbull

The famous painting, Declaration of Independence, depicting the five-man drafting committee presenting their work to Congress (John Trumbull/U.S. Congress)

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

— Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

  • For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
  • For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
  • For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
  • For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
  • For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
  • For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
  • For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
  • For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
  • For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren.

We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here.

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.

We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare…

… That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

  • RSS Recent entries from the Permanent Defense Media Center