Republicans in Washington are understandably unhappy with their recent electoral performances. Both of Washington’s United States Senators are Democrats. Eight of its ten United States Representatives are Democrats. The Democratic Party also controls both chambers of the state legislature and holds every statewide executive office, from Governor to Insurance Commissioner.
Mindful of the need to offer a strategy that can break the party’s losing streak, Jim Walsh, the new Chairman of the Washington State Republican Party, has recently sent out emails saying that Republicans plan to win by having high margins in Eastern Washington. An excerpt from one of these emails is below:
There are enough votes in Eastern Washington to overturn the whims of King County. Common sense candidates can offer conservative ideals and win over all voters. I know. I’ve done it. The mainstream media may scoff about Republicans winning statewide. I am telling you that we can do it. We will accomplish all of these things. And we will do them together. If I did not believe this, I would not have run for WSRP Chairman.
Emphasis is Walsh’s.
Everybody knows that Eastern Washington is pretty Republican, so it is understandable that Walsh may want to center it in his apparent new grand strategy to make Washington red. Walsh may just be trying to fundraise by appealing to Republicans in Eastern Washington who feel ignored by the state government, but if he attempts to pursue this strategy as a recipe for Republican victory in 2024, no one should expect it to be successful.
Republicans have no realistic path to winning statewide in Washington without substantially improving their numbers in King County for three key reasons:
- First, Eastern Washington makes up a much smaller percentage of the statewide population than King County does.
- Second, Eastern Washington is not as Republican as many people think it is, and it is much less Republican than King County is Democratic.
- Third, there are parts of Western Washington that are not King County, and, on the whole, they tend to vote Democratic (including communities such as Aberdeen, in Walsh’s southwestern Washington district).
Eastern Washington (meaning, Okanogan, Chelan, Kittitas, Yakima and Klickitat counties, and every Washington county to the east of them) has a substantially smaller number of voters than King County, never mind all of Western Washington. In 2020, King County made up 30% of the state electorate, Eastern Washington made up 20% of the statewide electorate, and non-King County Western Washington made up half of the statewide electorate.
This changes from election to election, but only on the margins.
In 2020, Biden-Harris won in King County with 75% of the vote, compared to 22% for Trump-Pence. Trump-Pence won Eastern Washington 55% to 42%.
That is a fifty-three-point margin for Biden-Harris in King County compared to a thirteen-point margin for Trump-Pence in Eastern Washington.
Eastern Washington has some Democratic strongholds, like the City of Spokane, which Biden won by eighteen points. It has a notable number of Latino and Native American voters. There are several towns with universities, which also tend to vote blue. And there are many large towns and small cities, like Wenatchee, Yakima, the Tri Cities and Walla Walla, that can range from respectable Republican victories to narrow Democratic wins, but they almost always keep Republican margins much lower than what they would need in Eastern Washington to compensate for the Democratic margin in King County.
In terms of total votes, Biden netted more than three times as many votes in the City of Seattle alone (346,736 votes more than Trump) than Trump did in all of Eastern Washington (102,303 more than Biden). He netted more than six times as many in King County (638,143 votes over Trump).
It is possible that over time, Eastern Washington could become substantially more Republican, but it is hard to imagine a forty-point shift anytime soon to equal Biden’s net percentage margin in King County.
There is not a single county in Washington, East or West of the Cascades, where Trump reached 75%. Trump came closest in the extremely rural Lincoln County (home to Davenport), where he garnered 73%. If Trump could not do it anywhere in Eastern Washington last cycle, Republicans probably cannot reach that vote share in places like Spokane, Pullman or Cheney in the foreseeable future.
Of course, because King County makes up a much larger share of Washington’s electorate, if the Republican candidate’s percentage lead in Eastern Washington were to equal the Democratic candidate’s percentage margin in King County, that would still not be close to good enough to make up for the Democratic raw vote margin in King County. The Republican would need to beat it significantly.
In order for Trump to have made up for Biden’s King County vote share east of the Cascades, assuming the same number of ballots were cast, and no one voted for minor party candidates, Trump would have needed an Eastern Washington margin of around seventy-nine points (89.5% to 10.5%), which is completely implausible. Again, his victory margin was thirteen points in 2020.
There are people who do not usually vote who could come out to vote in future elections. But even then, it is hard to imagine Republicans being able to mobilize enough voters to make up for King County’s larger relative size.
As of July 2022, there were 989,818 registered voters in Eastern Washington. This may have increased marginally in the last year, but not enough to come close to the 1.2 million who voted in King County in 2020.
Washington is made up of more than just Eastern Washington and King County. Non-King County Western Washington has cities such as Tacoma, Bellingham, Olympia and Vancouver which are very Democratic.
It has Seattle area suburbs like Lynnwood and Bainbridge Island and smaller towns in midsize counties like Port Townsend and Anacortes which also usually vote for Democrats. Non-King County Western Washington voted for Biden by twelve points, 54% to 42%. With King County included, Western Washington voted for Biden by twenty-seven points. Even if Trump were to have won every vote from every Eastern Washingtonian who voted in 2020, Biden still would have won Washington because of his raw vote margin in Western Washington.
These are all hypotheticals that will probably never happen. And they all focus on one example, but statewide election after statewide election, even in closer elections, the same story emerges. Despite Walsh’s assertions, there simply aren’t enough votes in Eastern Washington to overturn the whims of King County.
For instance, in the 2016 State Auditor race, Republican Mark Miloscia won in Eastern Washington by twenty points and fought his opponent, Democrat Pat McCarthy, to a virtual draw in non-King County Western Washington.
Excluding King County, he won the state by five points.
Unfortunately for Miloscia, even though he had represented Federal Way in Olympia for over a decade, and for much of that time as a Democrat, he lost King County by twenty-seven points. He lost his race for State Auditor by five points.
The good news for Republicans is that there are examples across America of places that routinely vote for Democrats at the presidential level that have recently elected Republicans to statewide office. Republican Larry Hogan was re-elected Governor of Maryland in a landslide in 2018. Republican Susan Collins was elected to her fifth term as United States Senator from Maine in 2020.
Omaha voted for Biden for President by double digits, but it voted for Republican Jean Stothert for Mayor by nearly thirty points in 2021.
What all these candidates have in common is that they all made massive inroads into very Democratic voting constituencies, and none of them sounded like a typical Republican, never mind Donald Trump or Loren Culp.
The even better news for the Republicans is that there is a recent example of a Republican winning statewide in Washington.
In 2020, even with Biden on the ballot, Kim Wyman was reelected Secretary of State by seven points, besting Trump’s margin by twenty-nine points.
The key to her victory was not her solid numbers in Eastern Washington. Wyman won because she portrayed herself as a nonpartisan election administrator who ran an extremely accessible voting system, which was in stark contrast to Trump, who was talking non-stop about how voting by mail leads to fraud.
Few Republicans in Washington typically use this type of messaging.
Wyman did run up the score in Eastern Washington, winning it by twenty-nine points, a seventeen-point overperformance compared to Trump, but this is not why she won. Biden won Washington by nineteen points, so a seventeen point overperformance compared to Trump would not have been good enough, particularly if it was confined to Eastern Washington.
Wyman outperformed Trump by even more in Western Washington, winning it by two points, a twenty-nine point overperformance compared to Trump.
She exceeded Trump’s margin in the non-King County portions of Western Washington by 25 points, winning them by thirteen points (56% to 43%), while she overperformed Trump in King County by thirty-six points, losing it by seventeen points (59% to 41%).
Crucially, she did not win in King County, but she cut her Democratic opponent Gael Tarleton’s margin enough so that, unlike for Miloscia, King County did not make it impossible for her to win. In fact, her overperformance compared to Trump in King County was her second highest of any county in the state, with her only greater overperformance being Thurston County, where she previously held office as County Auditor (and when Walsh emails about winning over voters with “conservative ideals,” he probably does not have Olympia in mind).
In short, for Republican Kim Wyman, winning statewide meant making major inroads everywhere, but particularly in King County.
In the United States, people who live in denser areas tend to vote for Democrats, while those who live in less densely populated places tend to vote for Republicans. Washington is much more urban than the country overall.
As a consequence, it tends to vote for Democrats.
Republican candidates can win statewide, but that means they need to appeal to voters in King County, because, despite Jim Walsh’s claims, there just are not enough votes in Eastern Washington to overturn King County’s whims.
Tuesday, September 5th, 2023
Republicans in Washington State cannot just ignore King County and expect to win
Republicans in Washington are understandably unhappy with their recent electoral performances. Both of Washington’s United States Senators are Democrats. Eight of its ten United States Representatives are Democrats. The Democratic Party also controls both chambers of the state legislature and holds every statewide executive office, from Governor to Insurance Commissioner.
Mindful of the need to offer a strategy that can break the party’s losing streak, Jim Walsh, the new Chairman of the Washington State Republican Party, has recently sent out emails saying that Republicans plan to win by having high margins in Eastern Washington. An excerpt from one of these emails is below:
Emphasis is Walsh’s.
Everybody knows that Eastern Washington is pretty Republican, so it is understandable that Walsh may want to center it in his apparent new grand strategy to make Washington red. Walsh may just be trying to fundraise by appealing to Republicans in Eastern Washington who feel ignored by the state government, but if he attempts to pursue this strategy as a recipe for Republican victory in 2024, no one should expect it to be successful.
Republicans have no realistic path to winning statewide in Washington without substantially improving their numbers in King County for three key reasons:
Eastern Washington (meaning, Okanogan, Chelan, Kittitas, Yakima and Klickitat counties, and every Washington county to the east of them) has a substantially smaller number of voters than King County, never mind all of Western Washington. In 2020, King County made up 30% of the state electorate, Eastern Washington made up 20% of the statewide electorate, and non-King County Western Washington made up half of the statewide electorate.
This changes from election to election, but only on the margins.
In 2020, Biden-Harris won in King County with 75% of the vote, compared to 22% for Trump-Pence. Trump-Pence won Eastern Washington 55% to 42%.
That is a fifty-three-point margin for Biden-Harris in King County compared to a thirteen-point margin for Trump-Pence in Eastern Washington.
Eastern Washington has some Democratic strongholds, like the City of Spokane, which Biden won by eighteen points. It has a notable number of Latino and Native American voters. There are several towns with universities, which also tend to vote blue. And there are many large towns and small cities, like Wenatchee, Yakima, the Tri Cities and Walla Walla, that can range from respectable Republican victories to narrow Democratic wins, but they almost always keep Republican margins much lower than what they would need in Eastern Washington to compensate for the Democratic margin in King County.
In terms of total votes, Biden netted more than three times as many votes in the City of Seattle alone (346,736 votes more than Trump) than Trump did in all of Eastern Washington (102,303 more than Biden). He netted more than six times as many in King County (638,143 votes over Trump).
It is possible that over time, Eastern Washington could become substantially more Republican, but it is hard to imagine a forty-point shift anytime soon to equal Biden’s net percentage margin in King County.
There is not a single county in Washington, East or West of the Cascades, where Trump reached 75%. Trump came closest in the extremely rural Lincoln County (home to Davenport), where he garnered 73%. If Trump could not do it anywhere in Eastern Washington last cycle, Republicans probably cannot reach that vote share in places like Spokane, Pullman or Cheney in the foreseeable future.
Of course, because King County makes up a much larger share of Washington’s electorate, if the Republican candidate’s percentage lead in Eastern Washington were to equal the Democratic candidate’s percentage margin in King County, that would still not be close to good enough to make up for the Democratic raw vote margin in King County. The Republican would need to beat it significantly.
In order for Trump to have made up for Biden’s King County vote share east of the Cascades, assuming the same number of ballots were cast, and no one voted for minor party candidates, Trump would have needed an Eastern Washington margin of around seventy-nine points (89.5% to 10.5%), which is completely implausible. Again, his victory margin was thirteen points in 2020.
There are people who do not usually vote who could come out to vote in future elections. But even then, it is hard to imagine Republicans being able to mobilize enough voters to make up for King County’s larger relative size.
As of July 2022, there were 989,818 registered voters in Eastern Washington. This may have increased marginally in the last year, but not enough to come close to the 1.2 million who voted in King County in 2020.
Washington is made up of more than just Eastern Washington and King County. Non-King County Western Washington has cities such as Tacoma, Bellingham, Olympia and Vancouver which are very Democratic.
It has Seattle area suburbs like Lynnwood and Bainbridge Island and smaller towns in midsize counties like Port Townsend and Anacortes which also usually vote for Democrats. Non-King County Western Washington voted for Biden by twelve points, 54% to 42%. With King County included, Western Washington voted for Biden by twenty-seven points. Even if Trump were to have won every vote from every Eastern Washingtonian who voted in 2020, Biden still would have won Washington because of his raw vote margin in Western Washington.
These are all hypotheticals that will probably never happen. And they all focus on one example, but statewide election after statewide election, even in closer elections, the same story emerges. Despite Walsh’s assertions, there simply aren’t enough votes in Eastern Washington to overturn the whims of King County.
For instance, in the 2016 State Auditor race, Republican Mark Miloscia won in Eastern Washington by twenty points and fought his opponent, Democrat Pat McCarthy, to a virtual draw in non-King County Western Washington.
Excluding King County, he won the state by five points.
Unfortunately for Miloscia, even though he had represented Federal Way in Olympia for over a decade, and for much of that time as a Democrat, he lost King County by twenty-seven points. He lost his race for State Auditor by five points.
The good news for Republicans is that there are examples across America of places that routinely vote for Democrats at the presidential level that have recently elected Republicans to statewide office. Republican Larry Hogan was re-elected Governor of Maryland in a landslide in 2018. Republican Susan Collins was elected to her fifth term as United States Senator from Maine in 2020.
Omaha voted for Biden for President by double digits, but it voted for Republican Jean Stothert for Mayor by nearly thirty points in 2021.
What all these candidates have in common is that they all made massive inroads into very Democratic voting constituencies, and none of them sounded like a typical Republican, never mind Donald Trump or Loren Culp.
The even better news for the Republicans is that there is a recent example of a Republican winning statewide in Washington.
In 2020, even with Biden on the ballot, Kim Wyman was reelected Secretary of State by seven points, besting Trump’s margin by twenty-nine points.
The key to her victory was not her solid numbers in Eastern Washington. Wyman won because she portrayed herself as a nonpartisan election administrator who ran an extremely accessible voting system, which was in stark contrast to Trump, who was talking non-stop about how voting by mail leads to fraud.
Few Republicans in Washington typically use this type of messaging.
Wyman did run up the score in Eastern Washington, winning it by twenty-nine points, a seventeen-point overperformance compared to Trump, but this is not why she won. Biden won Washington by nineteen points, so a seventeen point overperformance compared to Trump would not have been good enough, particularly if it was confined to Eastern Washington.
Wyman outperformed Trump by even more in Western Washington, winning it by two points, a twenty-nine point overperformance compared to Trump.
She exceeded Trump’s margin in the non-King County portions of Western Washington by 25 points, winning them by thirteen points (56% to 43%), while she overperformed Trump in King County by thirty-six points, losing it by seventeen points (59% to 41%).
Crucially, she did not win in King County, but she cut her Democratic opponent Gael Tarleton’s margin enough so that, unlike for Miloscia, King County did not make it impossible for her to win. In fact, her overperformance compared to Trump in King County was her second highest of any county in the state, with her only greater overperformance being Thurston County, where she previously held office as County Auditor (and when Walsh emails about winning over voters with “conservative ideals,” he probably does not have Olympia in mind).
In short, for Republican Kim Wyman, winning statewide meant making major inroads everywhere, but particularly in King County.
In the United States, people who live in denser areas tend to vote for Democrats, while those who live in less densely populated places tend to vote for Republicans. Washington is much more urban than the country overall.
As a consequence, it tends to vote for Democrats.
Republican candidates can win statewide, but that means they need to appeal to voters in King County, because, despite Jim Walsh’s claims, there just are not enough votes in Eastern Washington to overturn King County’s whims.
# Written by McCauley Pugh :: 9:30 AM
Categories: Elections, Party Politics
Tags: Partybuilding, WA-Exec, WA-Gov, WA-Leg, WA-Sen
Leave a comment or a ping.