Good morning! Here’s how Cascadia’s Members of Congress voted on major issues during the legislative week ending Friday, January 10th.
In the United States House of Representatives
ASSERTING CONGRESSIONAL CONTROL OVER WAR WITH IRAN: The House on January 9th voted, 224 for and 194 against, to require the Trump administration to obtain advance congressional approval for military actions against Iran or its proxy forces except when there is an imminent threat to the United States, its armed forces or its territories.
The measure (House Concurrent Resolution 83) invoked the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which asserts the power of Congress to declare war under Article I of the Constitution. Under the Vietnam-era law, presidents must notify Congress within forty-eight hours when they send the U.S. military into combat, then withdraw the forces within a specified period unless Congress has declared war against the enemy or otherwise authorized the action.
Democrats said the measure will have privileged status in the Senate and be eligible for passage by a majority vote there.
But Republicans called it non-binding. The war powers law has never been successfully used to end hostilities abroad. Last year, the House and Senate invoked it to end America’s military involvement in Yemen’s civil war, but were turned back when President Trump successfully vetoed the measure.
Thomas Massie, R‑Kentucky., said: “This vote isn’t about supporting or opposing President Trump.… [It] is about exercising our constitutional authority. More importantly, it is about our moral obligation to decide when and where our troops are going to be asked to give their lives.”
Don Bacon, R‑Nebraska, said the resolution “is designed to embarrass our president in front of the world and, in reality, gives comfort to Iran’s leadership. It weakens America and emboldens our enemies.”
A yes vote was to send the measure to the Senate.
Voting Nay (1): Republican Representative Russ Fulcher Not Voting (1): Republican Representative Mike Simpson | |
Voting Aye (4): Democratic Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Earl Blumenauer, Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader Voting Nay (1): Republican Representative Greg Walden | |
Voting Aye (7): Democratic Representatives Suzan DelBene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Pramila Jayapal, Kim Schrier, Adam Smith, and Denny Heck Voting Nay (3): Republican Representatives Jaime Herrera-Beutler, Dan Newhouse, and Cathy McMorris Rodgers |
Cascadia total: 11 aye votes, 5 nay votes, 1 not voting
REGULATING CANCER-LINKED “PFAS” CHEMICALS: Voting 247 for and 159 against, the House on January 10th passed a bill (H.R. 535) that would give the Environmental Protection Agency one year to designate a class of chemicals known as “PFAS” for coverage by the federal Superfund law (formally known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980), which requires abandoned toxic sites to be cleaned up and imposes retroactive legal liability on those responsible for the pollution.
The designation would require cleanup actions near scores of military bases and manufacturing sites throughout the United States where PFAS compounds have leached into groundwater and drinking water.
But they would join a long list of Superfund sites awaiting remediation.
The bill also would require the EPA to set standards for PFA air emissions and levels in drinking water and test all PFAS compounds within five years, and it would bar new compounds from the marketplace.
“PFAS” stands for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
They are components of fire-fighting foam used at airports and military installations as well as nonstick cookware; personal-care products including floss and makeup; household items including paints and stains; water-repellent clothing and carpeting; and other everyday products.
There are more about 7,800 PFA compounds, some of which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved for use in food packaging and medical devices, others of which are linked to extremely serious health conditions including kidney, liver, testicular and pancreatic cancers; infertility; weakened immune systems and impaired childhood development.
Mary Gay Scanlon, D‑Pennsylvania, said: “The fact of the matter is that the federal government has known about the dangers presented by PFAs for years. The chemical industry has known for even longer and, unsurprisingly, has fought tooth and nail against efforts to regulate their distribution and use.”
Debbie Lesko, R‑Arizona, said: “I don’t hear my Democratic colleagues here talking about the PFAS chemicals that are helping people,” such as devices that plug holes in infants’ hearts. She said the bill “creates an unrealistic condition that EPA must require manufacturers and processors to test each chemical in the entire PFAS class.a task that will be enormously expensive and time-consuming.”
A yes vote was to pass the bill.
Voting Nay (1): Republican Representative Russ Fulcher Not Voting (1): Republican Representative Mike Simpson | |
Voting Aye (4): Democratic Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Earl Blumenauer, Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader Voting Nay (1): Republican Representative Greg Walden | |
Voting Aye (8): Democratic Representatives Suzan DelBene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Pramila Jayapal, Kim Schrier, Adam Smith, and Denny Heck; Republican Representative Jaime Herrera-Beutler Voting Nay (2): Republican Representatives Dan Newhouse and Cathy McMorris Rodgers |
Cascadia total: 12 aye votes, 4 nay votes, 1 not voting
PROTECTING FETUSES FROM PFAS: Voting 187 for and 219 against, the House on January 10th defeated a Republican-sponsored motion specifying that “the unborn child” be included in the “vulnerable populations” protected from PFAS in H.R. 535 (above) sections concerning the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R‑Washington, said the act “already identifies pregnant women as an at-risk group. However, there is not just one, there are two people at risk, the pregnant woman and the unborn child.”
Debbie Dingell, D‑Michigan, called the amendment unnecessary because the bill sufficiently protects vulnerable populations.
A yes vote was to adopt the motion.
Voting Aye (1): Republican Representative Russ Fulcher Not Voting (1): Republican Representative Mike Simpson | |
Voting Aye (1): Republican Representative Greg Walden Voting Nay (4): Democratic Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Earl Blumenauer, Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader | |
Voting Aye (3): Republican Representatives Jaime Herrera-Beutler, Dan Newhouse, and Cathy McMorris Rodgers Voting Nay (7): Democratic Representatives Suzan DelBene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Pramila Jayapal, Kim Schrier, Adam Smith, and Denny Heck |
Cascadia total: 5 aye votes, 11 nay votes, 1 not voting
In the United States Senate
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR JOVITA CARRANZA: Voting 86 for and 5 against, the Senate on January 6th confirmed Jovita Carranza, the United States treasurer since June 2017, as administrator of the Small Business Administration, replacing Linda McMahon, who resigned in April 2019.
After a career of nearly three decades with UPS, Carranza served as deputy SBA administrator under President George W. Bush from 2006–2009. Carranza, 71, was raised in Chicago as the child of immigrants from Mexico.
Benjamin Cardin, D‑Maryland, said: “In nearly 30 years at UPS, where she began as a part-time package handler, Treasurer Carranza became the highest ranking Latina in the history of the company… I am optimistic that [she] can be the leader and advocate that SBA and American small businesses need right now.”
No senator spoke against the nominee.
A yes vote was to confirm Carranza.
Voting Aye (2): | |
Voting Nay (2): | |
Voting Aye (2): |
Cascadia total: 4 aye votes, 2 nay votes
Key votes ahead
The House will take up measures concerning age discrimination in the workplace and student loan forgiveness during the coming week of January 13th, while the Senate will vote on judicial and executive branch nominations and possibly a measure restraining the administration’s actions against Iran.
Editor’s Note: The information in NPI’s weekly How Cascadia’s U.S. lawmakers voted feature is provided by Voterama in Congress, a service of Thomas Voting Reports. All rights are reserved. Reproduction of this post is not permitted, not even with attribution. Use the permanent link to this post to share it… thanks!
© 2020 Thomas Voting Reports.