Were you one of the 18.7 million viewers of the Women’s Division I Championship game? If not, you missed out on an incredible spectacle of athleticism and a dramatic story of triumph and disappointment.
For those of you who didn’t watch, because you do not believe women have significant athletic talent and aren’t worth watching, I suggest you scroll on by this article. You and I likely will not agree on much of anything here. If you didn’t watch because you just don’t have any interest in sports, I invite you to stick around, because the conversation I invite you to is only partly about sports.
As I have watched media cover the story of women’s basketball this year and witnessed for the first time in my lifetime thorough coverage of the tournament, as well as all-female casts of commentators and analysts, I have seen many parallels between how we are talking about and consuming media about players and teams in the NCAA and how we are talking about and consuming media about political figures and political parties.
My husband and I attended the Final Four tournament last year. I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at the Women’s Basketball Coaches Association Conference, which takes place on the backside of the Final Four tournament each year. I delivered my speech the morning before the day of the Final Four games. I planned to speak and then attend sessions with coaches to learn and grow as an athlete.
Because I was a speaker, my husband and I got special tickets to see the Final Four and Championship games. We had the opportunity to sit in the stands amidst other Division I women’s coaches, all of whom had coached against at least one of the teams playing in the Final Four. We also had the opportunity to witness LSU with their star, Angel Reese, take on Iowa and its star, shooting phenom, Caitlin Clark, in the championship game.
The stadium was filled to the brim for the final game. There were more attendees at the final game in 2023 than ever in the history of women’s basketball. The building roared with excitement. Having played college basketball in the 1980s, when hardly anyone showed up to our games, it felt incredible to bear witness to this kind of interest in women’s basketball. Although both teams played well (I had no horse in the race; I just wanted great basketball), LSU won the title. In the last minutes of the game, when Angel Reese realized her team was going to win, she began taunting Clark with the “You can’t see mee” taunt Clark had been using earlier. Angel ended the game pointing to her ring finger as she walked past Caitlin towards her team’s bench.
Suddenly, in the media, instead of a focus on her team’s victory, Angel was painted as classless and a villain. How dare a young woman taunt another player in that way? What I (and all the coaches around me) knew was that Clark had been trash-talking the entire game (and complaining to refs about calls that didn’t go her way).
How was she now seen as the victim?
The mass media latched on to this story, and suddenly there was a flurry of posts describing Angel Reese as the villain and Caitlin Clark as the hero.
All eyes were on Clark as she began her senior season in November. She became the NCAA’s all-time leading scorer for men and women. She had the most 30-point games of any man or women and made the most 3‑pointers in a single season. By many metrics, she is one of the most iconic players of our time. Suddenly, people were paying attention to Clark and to women’s basketball in a way they had not before.
The algorithms for TikTok and Instagram flooded my feeds starting at the beginning of March Madness with posts about whether or not Caitlin Clark was the Greatest of All Time. The only thing she needed now was a championship title next to her name. The entire nation seemed to be rooting for her success. As we approached the Sweet Sixteen, reporters and sports commentators continued to bring up the rivalry of 2023 — Angel Reese vs Caitlin Clark (as if there weren’t 4 other players on each team). Angel Reese continued to be painted as “hood” and a villain. Caitlin Clark, undoubtedly an incredible player, was often spoken of as a god-like figure who could do no wrong.
The more I watched games and listened to commentators, the more I began to see parallels between basketball and our current political climate. Certain segments of American viewership talked about Caitlin Clark in ways very similar to how other groups (with some overlap?) talked about former President, Donald Trump. There was almost a worshipful stance towards each of these figures whenever they were brought up in their respective spaces. Groups of little blond girls had black and yellow t‑shirts made with Clark’s name printed on the front or back, much like the red Make America Great, Again baseball caps donned by men and women of all ages at Trump rallies.
What was the connection? What is the drive at the moment for millions of people to watch a young woman they have never met playing a sport for which they had no interest even just one year ago? What draws fans to outdoor events with Candidate Trump wearing their red hats and American flags?
The other day, as I was on a run, just days since the playing of the women’s championship, where Caitlin and her Iowa team lost for a second year in a row, this time to South Carolina, I listened to a favorite podcast of mine — Holy Post. The episode began with a discussion about several research projects that have come out with findings that fewer and fewer people are attending religious services now than at any other point in American history. The hosts discussed some of the reasons why people are leaving churches and the effect it is having on how Americans build (or do not) community differently now. On the podcast, they used examples of the ways Trump rallies almost mimic a typical church service and often end with singing in a style similar to a worship service.
Bells went off in my head.
With all the conflict at hand — from the contentious dynamics between Republican and Democrat — to the very real implications of sky-rocketing housing prices and an economy that feels tenuous and unsure, after several years of disconnection in response to COVID-19, people are feeling a sense of hopelessness. What used to draw people together — churches and schools and social clubs — is no longer meeting the same need. People are looking for someone or something to give them hope. They are looking for heroes, even if those heroes really can’t or won’t do anything to meet their actual needs.
Our need for heroes creates a parallel “need” for villains. Caitlin Clark became the hero for many who hoped beyond hope this young woman from middle America (coincidentally one of the whitest states in the nation) would “overcome.” I believe some actually thought a win for Caitlin would somehow carry them through this difficult time.
Angel Reese and any other player or team that got in the way of Caitlin’s victory suddenly became the villain. Ironically, the team that was able to defeat Iowa in the Finals, the South Carolina Gamecocks, despite being the only team in women’s basketball with zero losses this season, and coached by arguably on of the greatest coaches of all time, Dawn Staley, is now being accused by Iowa fans of being men playing as women. For those who have made Donald Trump their hero, Biden and anyone who claims “Democrat” must be the villain.
Lessons to be learned from all of this:
- There is no singular hero coming to save us. As many have been saying in the last week since the women’s final, the reason Dawn Staley and the Gamecocks were able to defeat Iowa was because they played as a team. There was no singular star, and even the bench players contributed much to the score (27 bench points from South Carolina; 0 bench points from Iowa). Find others in your community with whom you can partner to work towards a better tomorrow. You can’t do the work on your own; nor can anyone else.
- Just because you do not completely agree with someone does not make them the enemy. If you are a Democrat, don’t assume your Republican neighbor is a horrible person. Go meet them. Make a commitment to get to know them as a person. Find something about which you can connect. The same is true for those who identify as Republicans. Don’t just believe the sound bites and write all Democrats off as idiots.
- There is enough greatness to go around. Caitlin Clark is awesome, as is Angel Reese and Kamilla Cardoso and JuJu Watkins (USC) and Paige Bueckers (UConn) and so many others. No single figure is perfect. No single figure is worthy of our worship. Each and every one of us has something to contribute to community. You do not have to be “the best” to offer your best.
- This season in our country is difficult. Social networks can be a gift, but also a curse. Social networks curate communities that become echo chambers, that cause us to hear only one side of a story or to buy into narratives about whole groups of people that are incorrect or incomplete. Faceless and nameless figures can use their anonymity to spread hate and discord in ways that were much more difficult before we all had a phone in our hands.
What to do?
Put your phones down. Walk out in nature. Dance. Play board games with family and friends. Learn how to be together, again.
Commit to meeting neighbors for coffee… or tea… or a beer.
Choose kindness as you interact with people in stores and on trains and at work.
Finally, learn about the issues and the candidates and turn out to vote, especially in local elections. Local elections matter so much. You may not yet know who all to vote for in this year’s elections. Don’t worry about that now. Take time to get to know the candidates in your backyard — like those running for county commissioner or public utility district commissioner. They will be making decisions that affect how you get to live every day.
Remember, your voice matters. Use it for good.