NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, February 12th, 2019

February 12th election results: Big majorities back levies for Seattle, Renton schools

King County Elections has just released preliminary results for the February 12th special election, and the numbers so far are good across the board for Seattle and Renton Public Schools. Seattle voters are giving a big thumbs up to both of their levies (an operating levy and a capital levy), while voters in greater Renton are saying yes to proposed construction bonds as well as an operations levy.

The two Seattle levies and the Renton levy appear destined for passage.

Seattle Proposition #1 enjoys 65.81% support right now, with 34.19% opposed. That’s the operations levy. Seattle Proposition #2 enjoys 68.19% support, with 31.81% opposed. (The Seattle Times editorial board had urged a widely-ridiculed no vote on Proposition #1 and a yes vote on Proposition #2.)

In Renton, Proposition #2 has 59.80% support and opposition of 40.20%.

As set forth in the Washington State Constitution, the threshold is a simple majority of those voting and all of these levies are clearing that bar with no trouble.

Renton’s construction bonds are another matter. To pass, the construction bonds have to satisfy what’s called the sixty forty (60/40) rule. The bonds must receive a 60% yes vote with minimum turnout of 18,578 voters (40%).

If both requirements are not met, the bond measure will not pass. Like levies, the threshold for passage of bonds is specified in the Washington State Constitution.

Right now, the bonds are clearing the first hurdle… barely. 60.11% of ballots cast so far on the bond measure are in favor. However, turnout stands at only 16.86%. Turnout will need to more than double in order for the bonds to pass.

We think the sixty forty rule for bonds should be abolished, but such a change would require amending the Constitution. An amendment to do just that has been introduced and is being considered by the Legislature. The House version is House Joint Resolution 4203 and the Senate version is Senate Joint Resolution 8201.

We encourage you to contact your legislators and let them know you support HJR 4203 and SJR 8201. You can track its progress through the legislative process with our Statehouse Bill Tracker, which is always at your service on NPI’s website.

Adjacent posts

  • Donate now to support The Cascadia Advocate

    Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.

    Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you: we have never accepted advertising or placements of paid content.

    And we’d like it to stay that way.

    Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.

    Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.

    Become an NPI member Make a one-time donation