NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Wednesday, February 13th, 2019

VICTORY! Washington State Senate votes to ban fracking in oil and gas production

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, could soon be banned in Washington State if a bill approved by the Senate today becomes law. Senate Bill 5145, sponsored by Senator Jesse Salomon, would ban the destructive practice of injecting fluids into gas and oil wells under pressures great enough to fracture oil and gas-bearing rock.

Twenty-nine senators voted for the bill on final passage, with eighteen opposed.

The roll call was as follows:

Roll Call
SB 5145
Hydraulic fracturing
3rd Reading & Final Passage

Yeas: 29; Nays: 18; Excused: 2

Voting Yea: Senators Billig, Carlyle, Cleveland, Conway, Darneille, Das, Dhingra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hawkins, Hobbs, Hunt, Keiser, Kuderer, Liias, Lovelett, McCoy, Mullet, Nguyen, Palumbo, Pedersen, Randall, Rolfes, Saldaña, Salomon, Takko, Van De Wege, Wellman, Wilson (Claire)

Voting Nay: Senators Bailey, Becker, Braun, Brown, Fortunato, Holy, Honeyford, King, O’Ban, Padden, Rivers, Schoesler, Short, Wagoner, Walsh, Warnick, Wilson (Lynda), Zeiger

Excused: Senators Ericksen, Sheldon

The Senate Democratic caucus was unified in its support of the bill. One Republican, Brad Hawkins, joined them to vote aye. Of the remaining Republicans, eighteen voted no, while two (Doug Ericksen and Tim Sheldon) were excused.

Although there is no oil or gas production currently happening in Washington, that doesn’t mean there won’t be any in the future. That’s why Senate Bill 5145 is so important. It safeguards our lithosphere and water supply by outlawing fracking.

As the bill’s preamble explains:

The legislature finds that hydraulic fracturing of underground formations for the removal of oil and gas deposits is a relatively new technology whose long-term impacts upon human health and environmental quality are largely unknown. This technology requires large quantities of fracking fluids containing chemicals that are exempt from public disclosure and which may contaminate groundwater and surface waters used as drinking water supplies.

Each well in which hydraulic fracturing is employed requires more than one million gallons of water per year, with the average well using from three to eight million gallons of water over its lifetime. In many areas of the state, the existing groundwater supplies and surface water sources are fully appropriated, and such large new demands would threaten existing uses for agriculture, industrial, and municipal purposes.

The legislature further finds that as much as ninety percent of the fracking fluids must be disposed of following use in the fracking well, with most of this fluid subsequently returned following limited treatment back into underground injection wells.

Very little is known at this time regarding the impact that these disposed fluids may have upon groundwater aquifers and the potential adverse human health impacts from such exposure.

Other adverse environmental impacts have also been identified in hydraulic fracturing. Large quantities of methane are released in this process, which is both a toxic pollutant as well as a very potent greenhouse gas. Hydraulic fracturing is also suspected to be the source of increased seismicity in some regions with numerous wells.

Our team at the Northwest Progressive Institute strongly supports this legislation and thanks all who voted for its passage. We urge the House of Representatives to take up this bill and send it to Governor Inslee for his signature.

Adjacent posts

  • Donate now to support The Cascadia Advocate

    Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.

    Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you: we have never accepted advertising or placements of paid content.

    And we’d like it to stay that way.

    Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.

    Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.

    Become an NPI member Make a one-time donation


  1. Doesn’t mean much if we let it be shipped to ports, like Tacoma,for shipping-will completely decimate Puget Sound.
    Jay Inslee is supporting these horrible projects

    # by Carol Olivier :: February 16th, 2019 at 11:56 AM
    • Not sure what you mean, Carol. If you’re referring to the Tacoma methanol project, that was canceled.

      Banning fracking is important and meaningful regardless. It shuts the door on the possibility of dangerous chemicals finding their way into our water supply as a result of oil and gas drilling.

      # by Andrew :: February 22nd, 2019 at 5:26 PM