NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Wednesday, September 19th, 2012

U.S. Representative Rick Larsen leads the charge to stop voter suppression

Reacting to laws making aiming to increase the difficulty to vote since conservatives took control of  state governments in the 2010 midterm elections, Congressman Rick Larsen, along with 14 other House Democrats, introduced a bill yesterday to “combat voter suppression efforts across the country“. Only two of the current co-sponsors represent a state which has enacted a voter ID law since 2010, though Virginia, where co-sponsor Rep. James Moran represents the 8th District, tried to enact voter ID provisions in 1999.

This legislation is particularly as Republicans try to use voter eligibility and access to the right to vote a political tool in order to help the electoral chances of their candidates, including the much aired statement by Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, who said that the law enacted in Pennsylvania, the one which was ordered yesterday by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to be reconsidered, would “allow Governor Romney to win the state”. Think Progress just reported today that the Ohio Secretary of State told Tea Partiers that strict voter ID laws be pushed through their General Assembly once the November election was over.

Rep. Larsen was interviewed by NPR today about the bill introduced by himself and his colleagues, where he likened the “states rights” arguments which might be used against this legislation, likening voter ID to previous attempts at voter suppression in the past, referencing Jim Crow laws and poll taxes, more explicit forms of disenfranchisement. He described the legislation as similar to Washington’s system, where voters sign an affidavit attesting to their identity. While this eases voting, it carries high penalties for fraud, just like we have in Washington.

The federal government has stepped in before when the right to vote has not been upheld for all citizens, and the America Votes Act of 2012, as it is called, is no different, preventing rights from being subject to political calculation. The bill provides a simple solution to problem which pushes large swathes of voters out of our democratic system. Considering the current composition of the House (that’s a recurring theme, isn’t it?) action is unlikely to be taken about a bill which hurts the Republican House majority’s chances, but at least some of our elected officials are trying to take action to solve a problem which affects the rights of everyday citizens.

 

Adjacent posts

  • Donate now to support The Cascadia Advocate


    Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.

    Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you: we have never accepted advertising or placements of paid content.

    And we’d like it to stay that way.

    Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.

    Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.

    Become an NPI member Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. There needs to concern about the integrity of electronic voting, particularly in swing states. This is especially true in Ohio, where there have been problems in the recent past, and that certainly were a major factor in the 2004 Presidential Election. What can be done about this? Do we need to bring in an international body to observe our elections? It certainly would be in the rest of the world’s interest to ensure that US elections are accurately and honestly conducted.

    # by Eric Madis :: October 17th, 2012 at 11:52 AM