As the Wash­ing­ton State leg­is­la­ture enters its sev­enth spe­cial ses­sion in three years, dis­rupt­ing fall plans, meet­ings, and speak­ing appear­ances for the mem­bers of both state hous­es, the ses­sion called by Gov­er­nor Inslee deserves notice for where key play­ers in statewide bud­get and rev­enue fights are lin­ing up–mainly that Boe­ing and the Asso­ci­a­tion of Wash­ing­ton Busi­ness have come out in sup­port of increased tax­es for res­i­dents of the state. And these two orga­ni­za­tions are doing so despite furi­ous­ly resist­ing every attempt in the past to pay slight­ly high­er tax­es to go towards those pro­grams which reduce income inequal­i­ty and strength­en our shared society.

Mov­ing for­ward from the leg­is­la­ture’s fail­ure to pass a trans­porta­tion bud­get in the reg­u­lar and two spe­cial ses­sions ear­li­er in the year, it was wide­ly sur­mised that the main focus of the short­er 2014 ses­sion would be pass­ing a trans­porta­tion bud­get. Instead, the leg­is­la­ture is being called in ear­ly so that Boe­ing can begin to receive expand­ed tax breaks that would give them $8 bil­lion dol­lars in incen­tives through 2040.

Pass­ing a trans­porta­tion bud­get is a cru­cial step to strength­en­ing pub­lic infra­struc­ture and restruc­ture the way we trav­el. The col­lapse of the Skag­it I‑5 bridge alone is enough indi­ca­tion of the need to rein­vest in our shared tran­sit sys­tems. And even expand­ing tax incen­tives for Boe­ing will have its ben­e­fits, as the pro­duc­tion of the 777X in the state is pro­ject­ed to cre­ate more than 50,000 jobs in the area and gen­er­ate bil­lions of dol­lars in eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty, accord­ing to the Gov­er­nor’s office. But fun­da­men­tal­ly Boe­ing and the AWB are ask­ing for direct ben­e­fits for them­selves while they were con­tent to see our schools get crowd­ed, our uni­ver­si­ties become inac­ces­si­ble, and work­ing fam­i­lies fall behind as child­care and health­care pro­grams get cut.

Any attempt to raise rev­enue to pre­vent the bil­lions of dol­lars in cuts to social ser­vices and pub­lic goods over the past few bien­ni­um have been met with oppo­si­tion by these enti­ties, with just two exam­ples being Boe­ing and the Asso­ci­a­tion work­ing to stop any sort of income tax or cap­i­tal gains tax from appear­ing in our state. These rev­enue changes would have solved the struc­tur­al prob­lems in our tax struc­ture and pro­vid­ed bil­lions of dol­lars to fund our schools and oth­er pub­lic invest­ments. Instead, we’ve had the sec­ond high­est tuition increas­es in the nation since the reces­sion began and fam­i­lies are no los­ing access to child­care while they are out work­ing, just a cou­ple among a trag­ic diver­si­ty of issues which show the lack of atten­tion that has been paid to the work­ing and mid­dle classes.

On top of this, more than a mil­lion Wash­ing­to­ni­ans are being affect­ed by the recent cuts to fed­er­al food assis­tance pro­grams, los­ing an aver­age of 21 meals a month for a fam­i­ly of four. The num­ber of res­i­dents in our state affect­ed by these cuts is greater than the nation­al aver­age, and indi­cates that the leg­is­la­ture needs to focus on these res­i­dents and make sure they have the secu­ri­ty and oppor­tu­ni­ty need­ed to lead a thriv­ing, pro­duc­tive life.

Boe­ing and the Asso­ci­a­tion of Wash­ing­ton Busi­ness get­ting what they want out of the trans­porta­tion bud­get could indeed be a boon for our state. It shows, how­ev­er, that they aren’t anti-tax by any means. When the leg­is­la­ture next brings up rev­enue pro­pos­als to fund the pro­grams crit­i­cal to a healthy soci­ety, either this ses­sion or one in the near future, the Asso­ci­a­tion and Boe­ing should find a bit of tact and a bit of grace to rec­og­nize that the state is pro­vid­ing for them what they’ve not been will­ing to see for oth­ers. Next time the leg­is­la­ture brings up new rev­enue pack­ages for con­sid­er­a­tion the AWB should do a lit­tle less fight­ing and a lit­tle more help­ing, not just for them­selves, but for all Washingtonians.

Adjacent posts