NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate provides the Northwest Progressive Institute's uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Friday, March 31st, 2023

VICTORY! Idaho Republican legislators’ latest effort to sabotage the initiative process fails

A pro­posed con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment that would have made qual­i­fy­ing ini­tia­tives to Ida­ho’s statewide bal­lot much more dif­fi­cult has failed, thanks to Repub­li­can defec­tors in the Gem State’s House of Representatives.

An attempt to approve Sen­ate Joint Res­o­lu­tion 101 — dubbed the “Silence the Vot­ers Amend­ment” by crit­ics — fell eight votes short yes­ter­day, which means the pro­posed con­sti­tu­tion­al change won’t be sent to Ida­ho voters.

Here’s a quick syn­op­sis of the amend­ment from the Ida­ho Con­ser­va­tion League, which oppos­es it, like NPI: “Sen­ate Joint Res­o­lu­tion 101 would require sig­na­tures from 6% of eli­gi­ble vot­ers from all thir­ty-five leg­isla­tive dis­tricts, instead of the cur­rent require­ment for 6% of vot­er sig­na­tures from eigh­teen dis­tricts. Under the pro­pos­al, if a sin­gle dis­trict fails to get enough sig­na­tures, the ini­tia­tive would not qual­i­fy for the bal­lot. Ida­ho already has one of the most stren­u­ous bal­lot ini­tia­tive process­es in the coun­try and SJR 101 would fur­ther restrict it.”

“In all hon­esty, most of us believed it would be a long shot to defeat this amend­ment on the House floor,” said Reclaim Ida­ho’s Luke Mayville. “But we tried any­way. We left it all on the field, and we pulled off a mas­sive upset.”

“Over a cen­tu­ry ago, a pop­ulist move­ment swept the coun­try and estab­lished the rights of ini­tia­tive and ref­er­en­dum in Ida­ho and in states across the coun­try,” he con­tin­ued. “It’s impor­tant to rec­og­nize that today there is an anti-pop­ulist, anti-cit­i­zen agen­da, advanced by nation­al spe­cial inter­est groups, attempt­ing to elim­i­nate those same rights. In Arkansas, Ohio, and else­where, ini­tia­tive rights are being rolled back this very moment.”

“Here in Ida­ho, we are defend­ing our rights.”

“In the same way that the cit­i­zens of Ida­ho stood up against the school-vouch­er agen­da and defend­ed our pub­lic schools, we have now suc­cess­ful­ly beat back the attempt by spe­cial inter­ests to take away our ini­tia­tive rights.”

Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Mark Sauter, a Repub­li­can who rep­re­sents Sand­point, was among the nays. Sauter “told the House that he’s received an ‘over­whelm­ing’ num­ber of calls and emails oppos­ing the res­o­lu­tion,” the Ida­ho States­man report­ed.

The States­man­’s Ryan Suppe added this obser­va­tion: “Dur­ing pub­lic hear­ings on the pro­pos­al, Ida­ho res­i­dents from across the state slammed it.”

But Repub­li­can leg­isla­tive lead­ers did­n’t lis­ten. They tried to push it through any­way. In the Sen­ate, they were suc­cess­ful: twen­ty-sev­en sen­a­tors vot­ed for it, while only eight were opposed. But in the House, the out­come was dif­fer­ent. Bicam­er­al­ism just helped save the peo­ple’s ini­tia­tive pow­er in Idaho!

The roll call was as follows:

Roll Call
Ini­tia­tives, signatures
3rd Read­ing & Final Passage

Ayes: 39; Nays: 31 (two-thirds thresh­old required for pas­sage)

Vot­ing Aye: Alfieri, Andrus, Bar­bi­eri, Boyle, Can­non, Cornilles, Crane (Jaron), Crane (Brent), Dixon (Sage), Dur­rant, Ehardt, Ehlers, Gal­lagher, Handy, Hawkins, Healey, Hill, Holtz­claw, Hor­man, Kings­ley, Lam­bert, Men­dive, Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Palmer, Pick­ett, Price, Red­man, Scott, Shep­herd, Skaug, Tan­ner, Van­der Woude, Wheel­er, Wis­niews­ki, Wroten, Young (Can­non), Mr. Speaker

Vot­ing Nay: All­go­od, Berch, Blanks­ma, Bundy, Burns, Chea­tum, Chew, Clow, Dixon (Chenele), Erick­son, Fur­niss, Galav­iz, Gan­non, Gar­ner, Green, Lant­i­ng, Man­war­ing, Math­ias, McCann, Mick­elsen, Nash, Necochea, Nelsen, Pet­zke, Ray­bould, Ray­mond, Roberts, Rubel, Sauter, Weber, Yamamoto

The Repub­li­cans who vot­ed no were:

  • Chris All­go­od, 11th District
  • Megan Blanks­ma, 8th Dis­trict, the House Major­i­ty Leader
  • Matthew Bundy, 8th District
  • Richard Chea­tum, 28th District
  • Lance Clow, 25th District
  • Chenele Dixon, 24th District
  • Mar­co Erick­son, 33rd District
  • Rod Fur­niss, 31st District
  • Dan Gar­ner, 28th District
  • Gre­go­ry Lant­i­ng, 25th District
  • Dustin Man­war­ing, 29th District
  • Lori McCann, 6th District
  • Stephanie Mick­elsen, 32nd District
  • Jack Nelsen, 26th District
  • James Pet­zke, 21st District
  • Britt Ray­bould, 34th District
  • Jer­ald Ray­mond, 31st District
  • Mark Sauter, 1st District
  • Jon Weber, 34th District
  • Julie Yamamo­to, 11th District

Many Repub­li­cans vot­ing no did so in tan­dem with their seat­mate. (Ida­ho, like Wash­ing­ton, has mul­ti-mem­ber leg­isla­tive dis­tricts rather than House districts).

The fail­ure of SJR101 is an impor­tant win for direct democ­ra­cy in the Gem State. We con­grat­u­late all of the peo­ple and orga­ni­za­tions that worked to defeat this bad con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment. It’s nice to get good polit­i­cal news out of Idaho!

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation

    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation

  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: