NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate provides the Northwest Progressive Institute's uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Friday, May 27th, 2016

Eyman’s I‑1366 is buried; now the Legislature needs to get back to work on school funding

Yes­ter­day, Wash­ing­ton’s Supreme Court gave Tim Eyman’s I‑1366 a prop­er and fit­ting bur­ial, rul­ing 9–0 that the mea­sure was unconstitutional.

In affirm­ing Judge William Down­ing’s deci­sion strik­ing down Tim Eyman’s I‑1366 in its entire­ty, the high court both did its job and res­cued the Leg­is­la­ture from hav­ing to wor­ry about los­ing $8 bil­lion in fund­ing for schools and oth­er vital pub­lic ser­vices by refus­ing to com­ply with Tim Eyman’s demand for a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment sab­o­tag­ing the major­i­ty vote clause of our Constitution.

($8 bil­lion is how much mon­ey we would have lost through 2021 had Sec­tion 2 of I‑1366 gone into effect last month, slash­ing the sales tax, which pro­vides most of the fund­ing for our state’s K‑12 schools, col­leges, and universities.)

With I‑1366 buried, the Leg­is­la­ture has one less prob­lem to deal with.

It may be out of ses­sion and most of its mem­bers are focused on get­ting reelect­ed, but the 2017 ses­sion is due to begin in just over sev­en months, and there’s plen­ty of advance work to be done to ensure it pro­duces bad­ly need­ed rev­enue reforms and a sound bud­get. As the Supreme Court has not­ed, the Leg­is­la­ture sim­ply has­n’t been deliv­er­ing for Wash­ing­ton’s kids and fam­i­lies, and that needs to change.

Those mem­bers who are assured of return­ing (unop­posed leg­is­la­tors as well as sen­a­tors who aren’t on the bal­lot this year) should all be invest­ing sub­stan­tive time and ener­gy get­ting ready for the forth­com­ing long ses­sion. A top pri­or­i­ty needs to be iden­ti­fy­ing solu­tions for fix­ing Wash­ing­ton’s upside-down tax code.

The Leg­is­la­ture ought to start by levy­ing a cap­i­tal gains tax on high earners.

Con­trary to what right wing think tanks like the Wash­ing­ton Pol­i­cy Cen­ter say, a cap­i­tal gains tax can be thought­ful­ly craft­ed to reli­ably pro­vide a mod­est amount of bad­ly-need­ed rev­enue each bien­ni­um. Reuven Car­lyle and oth­er leg­is­la­tors have been work­ing on this, and they deserve every­one’s full atten­tion and sup­port as they con­tin­ue to work on pro­duc­ing a pol­ished, refined bill for 2017. Ore­gon and Ida­ho levy cap­i­tal gains tax­es, and there’s no rea­son why we can’t as well.

Past NPI research showed a major­i­ty of like­ly 2015 (odd-year!) vot­ers sup­port a cap­i­tal gains tax. What’s more, an impres­sive forty-three per­cent of respon­dents in that sur­vey said they strong­ly sup­port­ed levy­ing a cap­i­tal gains tax.

Next, the Leg­is­la­ture should get rid of tax breaks that are no longer serv­ing the pub­lic inter­est, and pass a new account­abil­i­ty law that forces cor­po­ra­tions like Boe­ing to auto­mat­i­cal­ly pay back sub­si­dies they received if they do not deliv­er on their job cre­ation promis­es, or if they elim­i­nate Wash­ing­ton-based jobs.

The Leg­is­la­ture should also start work­ing on reform­ing prop­er­ty taxes.

Eyman’s I‑747 should be repealed, and a home­stead exemp­tion insti­tut­ed to ensure that mid­dle and low income fam­i­lies’ tax oblig­a­tions are fair.

Ulti­mate­ly, a solu­tion that makes prop­er­ty tax­es based on wealth would be ide­al, though imple­men­ta­tion might require a con­sti­tu­tion­al amendment.

To help school dis­tricts with facil­i­ty con­struc­tion and mod­ern­iza­tion (need­ed to imple­ment low­er class sizes), the Leg­is­la­ture should change the Con­sti­tu­tion to low­er the thresh­old for pas­sage of bonds from three-fifths (60%) to a sim­ple major­i­ty. One pro­pos­al we’ve seen to do this would require school dis­tricts to sub­mit bonds at gen­er­al elec­tions; dis­tricts would not have the option of send­ing bond propo­si­tions to vot­ers at spe­cial elec­tions like they do now.

If that’s some­thing Democ­rats and Repub­li­cans can agree on, then let’s get it approved and placed before voters.

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation


    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. It’s still a trav­es­ty that this ini­tia­tive passed. Very good news, though. 

    # by Emilio Leta :: May 27th, 2016 at 6:05 PM

One Ping

  1. […] I‑1366 is now in Washington’s polit­i­cal grave­yard, where it belongs. But the right wing is still bent on sab­o­tag­ing our Con­sti­tu­tion. Tim Eyman and his friends at the Wash­ing­ton Pol­i­cy Cen­ter want to give right wing Repub­li­cans in the Leg­is­la­ture per­ma­nent veto pow­er over any rev­enue bill. […]

  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: