Mike Chapman versus Marcia Kelbon
State Representative Mike Chapman (left) is running for the Senate seat currently held by Kevin Van De Wege, a fellow Democrat. Marcia Kelbon (right) is also running for the Republicans. (Campaign publicity photos)

Last sum­mer, Wash­ing­ton State Sen­a­tor Kevin Van De Wege announced he’d seek high­er office rather than run­ning for reelec­tion to the Sen­ate. That has cre­at­ed an open seat in a pre­dom­i­nant­ly rur­al dis­trict that remark­ably remains all-Demo­c­ra­t­ic despite the Repub­li­can Par­ty’s ascen­dan­cy through­out rur­al Washington. 

See­ing an oppor­tu­ni­ty to step into a more promi­nent role, Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Mike Chap­man, one of Van De Wege’s House coun­ter­parts, has thrown his hat in the ring. In state­ments dis­cussing his can­di­da­cy, Chap­man has empha­sized the bipar­ti­san nature of the Sen­ate and expressed his view that his voice will be more impact­ful as a senator.

In a state­ment pub­lished last July, he explained his inter­est in increas­ing the effec­tive­ness of his rep­re­sen­ta­tion for the Olympic Penin­su­la: “This is a crit­i­cal time for the Penin­su­la. We still have work to do to cre­ate jobs, increase eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty, increase pub­lic safe­ty and improve the qual­i­ty of life of every per­son that lives in this beau­ti­ful place.”

Chap­man is cur­rent­ly com­plet­ing his fourth term in the House, hav­ing pre­vi­ous­ly served as a local law enforce­ment offi­cer and cus­toms offi­cer before being elect­ed Com­mis­sion­er of Clal­lam Coun­ty. As a state rep­re­sen­ta­tive, Chap­man has focused on writ­ing eco­log­i­cal and infra­struc­tur­al leg­is­la­tion, spon­sor­ing notable pro­tec­tions for eth­i­cal fish­ing and infra­struc­tur­al projects along the coast. 

His web­site high­lights his accom­plish­ments procur­ing fund­ing for an Elwha Bridge replace­ment project and new roads near Sequim.

Chap­man is a front­line Demo­c­rat who has voiced oppo­si­tion to some of the police reform bills put for­ward by mem­bers of his party. 

“I didn’t sup­port all police reforms. I thought they went too far. I vot­ed for bipar­ti­san solu­tions,” Chap­man said of reforms that arose from anti-law enforce­ment protests that occurred not long after his 2022 reelection. 

On most issues, how­ev­er, he holds views that are in line with oth­er mem­bers of his par­ty. For exam­ple, Chap­man sup­ports envi­ron­men­tal restora­tion projects and thought­ful man­age­ment of log­ging, and has expressed sup­port for tax reforms that sup­port small businesses. 

The 24th Leg­isla­tive Dis­trict spans much of the Olympic Penin­su­la and stretch­es east past Sequim, encom­pass­ing Jef­fer­son and Clal­lam coun­ties. The 24th con­tains Sequim and Port Ange­les, but, as men­tioned, it is nonethe­less con­sid­ered a rur­al dis­trict as the major­i­ty of vot­ers are spread out in small com­mu­ni­ties along the coast. It’s worth repeat­ing that it is the last rur­al dis­trict in the state of Wash­ing­ton in which all seats are held by Democrats.

Although Clal­lam Coun­ty has been a tossup in recent elec­tions and the south­ern part of the coun­ty near Grays Har­bor is increas­ing­ly Repub­li­can, Jef­fer­son Coun­ty has been a reli­able lib­er­al strong­hold. This has allowed Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Chap­man and his seat­mate, Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Steve Tharinger, to coast to com­fort­able vic­to­ries in recent years. 

In the Sen­ate race this fall, Chap­man seems to be head­ed for anoth­er win. His like­ly oppo­nent, Mar­cia Kel­bon, faces an uphill bat­tle to dis­lodge Chapman’s sup­port among Jef­fer­son and Clal­lam Coun­ty vot­ers. (No oth­er can­di­dates had filed for the seat with the Pub­lic Dis­clo­sure Com­mis­sion as of press time.) 

Kel­bon cur­rent­ly serves as a fire com­mis­sion­er in Quilcene, a small town of about 600 on the Hood Canal. His­tor­i­cal­ly a fish­ing and log­ging town, Quilcene is known for the annu­al Olympic Music Fes­ti­val and one of the largest oys­ter hatch­eries in the world.

Kel­bon worked as a civil­ian engi­neer in the Navy before mov­ing to a biotech firm, where she act­ed as senior exec­u­tive and lawyer. She describes her­self as an inde­pen­dent thinker, and hopes to bridge par­ti­san divides in the Leg­is­la­ture. She declared her can­di­da­cy last year and does not have any cred­i­ble Repub­li­can rivals. 

Kel­bon describes her­self as a “mod­er­ate”, and many of the issues high­light­ed on her cam­paign web­site imply a focus on small government. 

Kel­bon focus­es pri­mar­i­ly on issues that affect rur­al res­i­dents, such as a tire reg­u­la­tion that would impact rur­al motor­cy­clists or fish­ery regulations. 

Kel­bon is cam­paign­ing on her oppo­si­tion to police over­sight and pol­lut­ing pric­ing leg­is­la­tion and her sup­port of crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion of drug use. Kel­bon also says she wants to scale back tax­es and busi­ness oper­a­tion fees, offer­ing famil­iar refrains about putting mon­ey back in the pock­et of mid­dle class fam­i­lies on the Peninsula. 

Although Repub­li­cans have indi­cat­ed they may put effort into the 24th dis­trict, Kel­bon has a long way to go to over­come Chapman’s name recog­ni­tion and reputation. 

Kel­bon ran against Greg Broth­er­ton for a coun­ty seat in 2022, but lacks Chapman’s his­to­ry of run­ning district-wide. 

Chap­man has raised sig­nif­i­cant­ly more than his oppo­nent in each of his past three races, but has donat­ed much of that back to the House Demo­c­ra­t­ic Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. Now he’s one of the Wash­ing­ton Sen­ate Demo­c­ra­t­ic cam­paign’s can­di­dates. So far this year, he has out­raised Kel­bon, and it is not unrea­son­able to con­clude that he will con­tin­ue to. Kel­bon is a com­pe­tent can­di­date and Repub­li­cans have some­times been able to erode the Demo­c­ra­t­ic mar­gin of vic­to­ry over the last decade in the 24th, but at the moment, Democ­rats look favored to hold the dis­tric­t’s Sen­ate seat this November. 

Adjacent posts

Leave a comment

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our Commenting Guidelines. If you submit any links to other websites in your comment or in the Website field, these will be published at our discretion. Please read our statement of Privacy Practices before commenting to understand how we collect and use submissions to the Cascadia Advocate. Your comment must be submitted with a name and email address as noted below. We will not publish or share your email address.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *