NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Wednesday, September 9th, 2015

Momentum builds for defeat of Tim Eyman’s odious I‑1366 as coalition roster swells

With Labor Day 2015 now behind us, the tra­di­tion­al home stretch of the annu­al autumn cam­paign sea­son has begun. The Novem­ber 3rd gen­er­al elec­tion is less than two months away, and bal­lots will be mailed in about thir­ty-five days.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the Wash­ing­ton State Supreme Court declined to issue an injunc­tion last Fri­day in Huff v. Wyman, which means Tim Eyman’s hostage-tak­ing Ini­tia­tive 1366 will be on the bal­lot. We had antic­i­pat­ed from the out­set of the case that the Court might not block I‑1366 (even though it is bla­tant­ly beyond the scope of the peo­ple’s ini­tia­tive pow­er), so we’ve con­tin­ued our coali­tion-build­ing efforts, in prepa­ra­tion for a bat­tle in the court of pub­lic opin­ion.

Amus­ing­ly, this morn­ing, Tim Eyman sent out anoth­er fundrais­ing appeal to his fol­low­ers in which he sneered, “Oppo­nents are despon­dent, dis­cour­aged, and down­cast.” I had to laugh when I read that.

Noth­ing could be fur­ther from the truth. The coali­tion opposed I‑1366 went to court not because we were afraid of los­ing, but because I‑1366 is so dan­ger­ous and destruc­tive that it need­ed to be fought on mul­ti­ple fronts.

Polling recent­ly con­duct­ed by Stu­art Elway shows I‑1366 start­ing out at under fifty per­cent, a bad place for an ini­tia­tive to be before an autumn cam­paign.

The Supreme Court may not have issued the injunc­tion we want­ed, but it did retain the case on appeal for a deci­sion on the mer­its. Tim Eyman has neglect­ed to men­tion that last Fri­day’s order won’t be the Court’s last word on this mat­ter.

(Eyman has also neglect­ed to men­tion to his fol­low­ers that he’s been ordered to appear in court after hav­ing failed to prompt­ly turn over records sub­poe­naed by the Pub­lic Dis­clo­sure Com­mis­sion as part of its inves­ti­ga­tion into his I‑517 cam­paign.)

We at NPI are ener­gized about accel­er­at­ing our coali­tion-build­ing work. Over Labor Day week­end, we secured the sup­port of a num­ber of elect­ed offi­cials and can­di­dates for NO on I‑1366, adding to the list already in progress. Here’s the updat­ed list pub­lished to the coali­tion web­site on Mon­day night:

Current and former elected leaders

Dan Evans, for­mer Gov­er­nor
Sam Reed, for­mer Sec­re­tary of State
Ralph Munro, for­mer Sec­re­tary of State
King Coun­ty Exec­u­tive Dow Con­stan­tine
King Coun­ty Asses­sor Lloyd Hara
King Coun­ty Coun­cilmem­ber Joe McDer­mott
Louise Miller, for­mer King Coun­ty Coun­cilmem­ber
Sen­a­tor Sharon Nel­son, Demo­c­ra­t­ic Leader
Sen­a­tor David Frockt
Sen­tor Prami­la Jaya­pal
Adam Kline, for­mer Sen­a­tor
State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Reuven Car­lyle
State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Zack Hud­gins
State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Gael Tar­leton
State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Roger Good­man
Eugene V. Lux, for­mer State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive
Seat­tle City Coun­cilmem­ber Sal­ly Bagshaw
Belle­vue May­or Clau­dia Bal­duc­ci
SeaT­ac City Coun­cilmem­ber Kathryn Camp­bell
Kirk­land City Coun­cilmem­ber Dave Ash­er
Kirk­land City Coun­cilmem­ber Shel­ley Klo­ba
Kirk­land City Coun­cilmem­ber Jay Arnold

Candidates

Van­dana Slat­ter, can­di­date for Belle­vue City Coun­cil
Rob John­son, can­di­date for Seat­tle City Coun­cil
Sandy Brown, can­di­date for Seat­tle City Coun­cil
Leslie Har­ris, can­di­date for Seat­tle School Board

Titles are list­ed for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pur­pos­es only.

And this is just the begin­ning. As this cam­paign rolls along, we expect to add many more elect­ed lead­ers and can­di­dates to our coali­tion ros­ter.

We also con­tin­ue to receive orga­ni­za­tion­al back­ing. I’m very pleased to report that last week, NO on I‑1366 gained the sup­port of AARP Wash­ing­ton State and OneAm­er­i­ca Votes. And just tonight, the Mason Coun­ty Democ­rats vot­ed unan­i­mous­ly to join us. We’re very pleased to have them all aboard.

Lat­er this week, we will have even more endorse­ments to announce. We’ll soon be adding a pre­lim­i­nary list of activists and con­cerned cit­i­zens who are opposed to I‑1366. If you’d like to join, you can sign up here.

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation


    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local pol­i­tics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for mon­ey.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy jour­nal­ism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time dona­tion