Last Week in Congress
NPI's Cascadia Advocate: Last Week in Congress

Good morn­ing! Here’s how Cascadia’s Mem­bers of Con­gress vot­ed on major issues dur­ing the leg­isla­tive week end­ing Fri­day, Novem­ber 15th.

In the United States House of Representatives

Chamber of the United States House of Representatives
The House cham­ber (U.S. Con­gress photo)

EXTENDING EXPORT-IMPORT BANK FOR TEN YEARS: Vot­ing 235 for and 184 against, the House on Novem­ber 15th passed a bill (H.R. 4863) that would reau­tho­rize the Export-Import Bank’s con­gres­sion­al char­ter through fis­cal 2029 while renam­ing it the Unit­ed States Export Financ­ing Agency.

The bill would increase the bank’s lend­ing author­i­ty from $135 bil­lion to $175 bil­lion and require at least 5 per­cent of its annu­al financ­ing to sup­port sales of renew­able-ener­gy and ener­gy-effi­cien­cy products.

Estab­lished dur­ing the New Deal era, the bank pro­vides tax­pay­er-backed financ­ing to help for­eign cus­tomers pur­chase U.S. goods and ser­vices when pri­vate-sec­tor lenders are unable or unwill­ing to pro­vide the finan­cial assistance.

Few­er than two per­cent of the Ex-Im trans­ac­tions have default­ed in recent years, and the bank usu­al­ly returns a prof­it to the Trea­sury even with an expo­sure of $100 bil­lion-plus in tax­pay­er lia­bil­i­ty. But crit­ics say the agency dis­torts free mar­kets by prac­tic­ing “cor­po­rate wel­fare” and “crony capitalism.”

Our own Den­ny Heck, D‑Washington, said: “With­out a robust offi­cial export-cred­it agency… we sim­ply lose out on over­seas sales, espe­cial­ly for small busi­ness­es, and cap­i­tal equip­ment mak­ers and farm­ers. Every coun­try rec­og­nizes this fact, but the U.S. alone among major economies has failed to ful­ly act on this knowl­edge. If we want to max­i­mize our exports, we need to stop the sab­o­tage of our cred­it agency, the Ex-Im Bank, and enhance it.”

Bill Huizen­ga, R‑Michigan, said the bill “allows the bank to pro­vide the tax­pay­er financ­ing to enti­ties owned and con­trolled by the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment includ­ing Chi­nese state-owned enter­pris­es involved in mil­i­tary activ­i­ties, human rights abus­es ….At a time when Chi­na is divert­ing mas­sive sub­si­dies to state-owned enter­pris­es, specif­i­cal­ly through the use of export sub­si­dies, why would Con­gress autho­rize the use of tax­pay­er dol­lars to make the Chi­nese Com­mu­nist Party’s job easier?”

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

The State of Idaho

Vot­ing Nay (2): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Russ Fulcher and Mike Simpson

The State of Oregon

Vot­ing Aye (4): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzanne Bonam­i­ci, Earl Blu­me­nauer, Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader

Vot­ing Nay (1): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Greg Walden

The State of Washington

Vot­ing Aye (8): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzan Del­Bene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Prami­la Jaya­pal, Kim Schri­er, Adam Smith, and Den­ny Heck; Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Dan Newhouse

Vot­ing Nay (1): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Cathy McMor­ris Rodgers

Not Vot­ing (1): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Jaime Herrera-Beutler

Cas­ca­dia total: 12 aye votes, 4 nay votes, 1 not voting

TREATING FOSSIL FUELS & CLEAN ENERGY EQUALLY: Vot­ing 188 for and 232 against, the House on Novem­ber 15th defeat­ed a Repub­li­can-spon­sored amend­ment that sought to remove from H.R. 4863 (above) pro­vi­sions that favor renew­able-ener­gy sales abroad over sales of fos­sil-fuel products.

The bill requires sales of renew­able-ener­gy goods and ser­vices to over­seas cus­tomers to receive at least 5 per­cent of the Export-Import Bank’s annu­al lend­ing author­i­ty. In addi­tion, ener­gy-relat­ed trans­ac­tions would have to esti­mate the vol­ume of car­bon diox­ide emit­ted by projects receiv­ing Ex-Im subsidies.

In part, the amend­ment would block cre­ation of a new Ex-Im unit aimed at pro­mot­ing ener­gy-effi­cien­cy and renew­able-ener­gy exports and require the bank to weigh the over­seas afford­abil­i­ty of ener­gy prod­ucts before approv­ing transactions.

Bill Flo­res, R‑Texas, said: “If emis­sions reduc­tions are the goal, fed­er­al poli­cies must focus on total per­for­mance and not favor one tech­nol­o­gy over the oth­er. In the devel­op­ing world, afford­able, clean ener­gy will give peo­ple more oppor­tu­ni­ty for a bet­ter life when expen­sive alter­na­tives are unaffordable.”

Sean Cas­ten, D‑Illinois, said: “The sci­ence is real­ly clear. The cli­mate cri­sis is here, and we are already see­ing its dev­as­tat­ing impact. Despite the best efforts of the cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion to the con­trary, the Unit­ed States must be a glob­al leader in act­ing to com­bat the cli­mate crisis.”

A yes vote was to adopt the amendment.

The State of Idaho

Vot­ing Aye (2): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Russ Fulcher and Mike Simpson

The State of Oregon

Vot­ing Aye (2): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Greg Walden; Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Kurt Schrader

Vot­ing Nay (3): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzanne Bonam­i­ci, Earl Blu­me­nauer, and Peter DeFazio

The State of Washington

Vot­ing Aye (3): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Jaime Her­rera-Beut­ler, Dan New­house, and Cathy McMor­ris Rodgers

Vot­ing Nay (7): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzan Del­Bene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Prami­la Jaya­pal, Kim Schri­er, Adam Smith, and Den­ny Heck

Cas­ca­dia total: 7 aye votes, 10 nay votes

BARRING ASSISTANCE TO CHINESE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSERS: Vot­ing 203 for and 218 against, the House on Novem­ber 15th defeat­ed a Repub­li­can-backed change to H.R. 4863 (above) that sought to place addi­tion­al require­ments on Export-Import Bank assis­tance designed to facil­i­tate U.S. sales to com­pa­nies owned by the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment. Under the motion, the assis­tance would be denied in cas­es where the Chi­nese com­pa­ny has a record of human rights abuses.

Den­ver Rig­gle­man, R‑Virginia, said that if mem­bers “care about what hap­pens to free­dom and democ­ra­cy, and if you care about human rights around the world, and if you want to see the [Ex-Im] bank reau­tho­rized with a pur­pose, then please join me in sup­port­ing this [motion].”

Den­ny Heck, D‑Washington, said he was opposed to “turn­ing [the bank] into a for­eign pol­i­cy agency.” He added: “Every­one on both sides of the cham­ber wants to do more to com­bat the com­pe­ti­tion of Chi­na and all the threats that they pose to our sys­tem of gov­ern­ment. But pas­sion untem­pered by exper­tise can lead to some very [prob­lem­at­ic] outcomes.”

A yes vote was to adopt the motion.

The State of Idaho

Vot­ing Aye (2): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Russ Fulcher and Mike Simpson

The State of Oregon

Vot­ing Aye (2): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Greg Walden; Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Kurt Schrader

Vot­ing Nay (3): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzanne Bonam­i­ci, Earl Blu­me­nauer, and Peter DeFazio

The State of Washington

Vot­ing Aye (3): Repub­li­can Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Jaime Her­rera-Beut­ler, Dan New­house, and Cathy McMor­ris Rodgers

Vot­ing Nay (7): Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep­re­sen­ta­tives Suzan Del­Bene, Rick Larsen, Derek Kilmer, Prami­la Jaya­pal, Kim Schri­er, Adam Smith, and Den­ny Heck

Cas­ca­dia total: 7 aye votes, 10 nay votes

In the United States Senate

Chamber of the United States Senate
The Sen­ate cham­ber (U.S. Con­gress photo)

CHAD WOLF, HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY: Vot­ing 54 for and 41 against, the Sen­ate on Novem­ber 13th con­firmed Chad F. Wolf as an under sec­re­tary at the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­ri­ty (DHS).

The vote paved the way for his pro­mo­tion a day lat­er to the post of act­ing sec­re­tary of home­land secu­ri­ty. He becomes Don­ald Trump’s fifth DHS sec­re­tary. Because Wolf’s sta­tus is “act­ing,” he avoids a con­fir­ma­tion process that would vet his qual­i­fi­ca­tions to run what is the gov­ern­men­t’s third-largest depart­ment with 240,000 employ­ees. Democ­rats called this a mis­guid­ed end-run around the Sen­ate’s con­sti­tu­tion­al “advice and con­sent” authority.

A for­mer lob­by­ist, Wolf has held sev­er­al DHS posi­tions, includ­ing chief of staff under for­mer Sec­re­tary Kirst­jen Nielsen, where he helped devel­op the admin­is­tra­tion’s pol­i­cy of break­ing up migrant fam­i­lies on the south­west border.

Ron John­son, R‑Wisconsin, said: “Ded­i­cat­ed Amer­i­cans serv­ing at DHS in act­ing posi­tions are doing admirable jobs under often times dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances. I trust that Chad Wolf will do the same…”

Jacky Rosen, D‑Nevada, said she could not sup­port “a nom­i­nee who played an inte­gral role in this admin­is­tra­tion’s cru­el fam­i­ly sep­a­ra­tion policy.…”

A yes vote was to con­firm the nominee.

The State of Idaho

Vot­ing Aye (2):
Repub­li­can Sen­a­tors Jim Risch and Mike Crapo

The State of Oregon

Vot­ing Nay (2):
Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tors Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley

The State of Washington

Vot­ing Nay (2):
Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tors Maria Cantwell and Pat­ty Murray

Cas­ca­dia total: 2 aye votes, 4 nay votes

STEVEN MENASHI, FEDERAL APPEALS JUDGE: Vot­ing 51 for and 41 against, the Sen­ate on Novem­ber 14th con­firmed Steven J. Menashi, a White House coun­sel and for­mer Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion act­ing coun­sel, as a judge on the 2nd Cir­cuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which has juris­dic­tion over dis­trict courts in New York, Ver­mont and Con­necti­cut. Menashi has been a law clerk to Supreme Court Asso­ciate Jus­tice Samuel Ali­to, an attor­ney in pri­vate prac­tice and a law-school pro­fes­sor. He drew Demo­c­ra­t­ic crit­i­cism over his author­ship of a Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion pol­i­cy deny­ing debt relief to stu­dents defraud­ed by for-prof­it col­leges, and for his stands on issues includ­ing Roe v. Wade, gun laws and LGBT rights.

Major­i­ty Leader Mitch McConnell, R‑Kentucky, said:

“Even the Amer­i­can Bar Asso­ci­a­tion’s Stand­ing Com­mit­tee on the Fed­er­al Judi­cia­ry, which has late­ly made head­lines for treat­ing Pres­i­dent Trump’s nom­i­nees in a less-than-even­hand­ed way, has rat­ed this nom­i­nee well-qualified.”

Demo­c­ra­t­ic Leader Chuck Schumer, D‑New York, said: “The Sen­ate is going to be asked to con­firm some­one to be a judge who designed an ille­gal scheme to deny debt relief so as to defraud stu­dents. The man has no prin­ci­ples. The man has no con­science. The man has no morals. He should not be on the bench.”

A yes vote was to con­firm the nominee.

The State of Idaho

Vot­ing Aye (2):
Repub­li­can Sen­a­tors Jim Risch and Mike Crapo

The State of Oregon

Vot­ing Nay (2):
Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tors Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley

The State of Washington

Vot­ing Nay (2):
Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tors Maria Cantwell and Pat­ty Murray

Cas­ca­dia total: 2 aye votes, 4 nay votes

Key votes ahead

Next week (which begins Mon­day, Novem­ber 18th), both cham­bers will take up a stop­gap fis­cal 2020 fund­ing bill to keep the gov­ern­ment in oper­a­tion after tem­po­rary spend­ing author­i­ty expires Novem­ber 21st.

Edi­tor’s Note: The infor­ma­tion in NPI’s week­ly How Cas­ca­di­a’s U.S. law­mak­ers vot­ed fea­ture is pro­vid­ed by Votera­ma in Con­gress, a ser­vice of Thomas Vot­ing Reports. All rights are reserved. Repro­duc­tion of this post is not per­mit­ted, not even with attri­bu­tion. Use the per­ma­nent link to this post to share it… thanks!

© 2019 Thomas Vot­ing Reports.

Adjacent posts