NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, December 15th, 2020

Republican plot to dissolve joint Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department collapses

A Repub­li­can scheme that sought to dis­solve Pierce Coun­ty’s joint health depart­ment arrange­ment with the City of Taco­ma col­lapsed in spec­tac­u­lar fash­ion ear­li­er this evening after errat­ic Coun­cilmem­ber Pam Roach (known for her “Who Moved My Flow­ers!?” speech) sided with sev­er­al Demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­cilmem­bers and vot­ed against the pro­pos­al, which she had orig­i­nal­ly sponsored.

Repub­li­can Coun­ty Exec­u­tive Bruce Dammeier’s office was behind the scheme. Dammeier report­ed­ly want­ed to dis­solve the joint health depart­ment so that his admin­is­tra­tion could get the clock tick­ing on the cre­ation of a stand­alone depart­ment that his pro-sprawl admin­is­tra­tion would have full con­trol over.

The joint depart­ment dates back to 1972, when it was formed under an inter­local agree­ment between Pierce Coun­ty and Taco­ma, its largest con­stituent city.

With Democ­rats set to con­trol the major­i­ty on the Pierce Coun­ty Coun­cil for the first time in eons, Dammeier need­ed Repub­li­cans to sign off on his scheme, fast.

Dammeier’s plot hit a huge snag yes­ter­day when Gov­er­nor Jay Inslee used the author­i­ty giv­en to him by the Revised Code of Wash­ing­ton (RCW) to issue an emer­gency procla­ma­tion bar­ring pub­lic health depart­ments like Taco­ma’s and Pierce Coun­ty’s from being dis­solved dur­ing the cur­rent pandemic.

This move irked Roach, who sug­gest­ed she was lean­ing towards vot­ing against Dammeier but might vote yes any­way to spite Inslee.

How­ev­er, in the end, after impas­sioned pub­lic tes­ti­mo­ny against the scheme, Roach opt­ed to vote against the pro­pos­al, there­by killing it.

“Pub­lic input is a high­er order than one-man one-vote. It was the right thing to do,” Roach told The News Tri­bune of Taco­ma after the vote took place.

Roach’s nay vote makes the ques­tion of whether Pierce Coun­ty could have suc­cess­ful­ly evad­ed Inslee’s procla­ma­tion moot. (Before the final vote, Repub­li­cans had amend­ed the draft leg­is­la­tion to attempt to skate around the procla­ma­tion by start­ing the dis­so­lu­tion process after its expiration.)

The spec­tac­u­lar col­lapse of Dammeier’s scheme means that Taco­ma-Pierce Coun­ty Pub­lic Health is prob­a­bly safe for the fore­see­able future.

Pri­or to the vote, pub­lic health lead­ers had loud­ly protest­ed Dammeier’s scheme, as had a large num­ber of Pierce Coun­ty residents.

“The time­line is so dat­ed that it doesn’t allow any­body to par­tic­i­pate in con­ver­sa­tion and find out what’s going on com­mu­ni­ty staff at the health depart­ment. Every­body is frus­trat­ed and feel blind­sided,” Board of Health Chair and Taco­ma Coun­cil mem­ber Cather­ine Ushk told The News Tri­bune.

“This would dis­man­tle the inde­pen­dence of our health depart­ment. Chang­ing it right now, it’s not just dras­tic, I think it’s irresponsible.”

We agree, and we’re thrilled this ill-con­ceived scheme has crashed and burned. The last thing Pierce Coun­ty need­ed was for its coop­er­a­tive­ly man­aged pub­lic health agency to be dis­man­tled and placed under the con­trol of Dammeier and his untrust­wor­thy asso­ciates, includ­ing the recent­ly defeat­ed Steve O’Ban.

The out­come of this vote is a big vic­to­ry for pub­lic health and safe­ty in Wash­ing­ton’s sec­ond largest coun­ty, one we can all celebrate.

Rarely do we get the oppor­tu­ni­ty to thank or con­grat­u­late Pam Roach, who is one of Tim Eyman’s pals, but today, Roach has earned our thanks for belat­ed­ly slam­ming the brakes on this ter­ri­ble idea. Thanks, Pam!

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation


    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. Tru­ly hilar­i­ous to watch Pam deliv­er the cru­cial no vote! 

    # by Amy Peterson :: December 16th, 2020 at 2:28 PM
  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: