NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Banks drop plans to charge debit card fees

Bank of America, acknowledging that its latest attempt to shake more money out of its customers’ pockets was destroying goodwill and hurting revenue, announced today that it was canceling its plans to impose a $5 monthly fee for debit card use, following in the footsteps of JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, SunTrust, and Regions, which have all made similar moves in the last few days.

“We have listened to our customers very closely over the last few weeks and recognize their concern with our proposed debit usage fee,” said David Darnell, co-chief operating officer of Bank of America, in a news release. “Our customers’ voices are most important to us. As a result, we are not currently charging the fee and will not be moving forward with any additional plans to do so.”

Bank of America attributed its decision to “customer feedback” and “the changing competitive marketplace.” By the latter, the bank undoubtedly means the ads that community banks, credit unions, and other nationwide competitors like Ally are running against it, along with grassroots efforts intended to encourage people to move their money and take their business elsewhere.

While Bank of America’s decision is good news – it shows what a loud consumer backlash can accomplish – this decision amounts to a calculated retreat. Bank of America and its executives are not sorry for having come up with this plan to force man (if not most) of their customers to pony up an extra sixty bucks a year to use a debit card. They’re only sorry that it didn’t work.

They probably figured they could weather some bad P.R. But the story didn’t go away, and when other banks started canceling their plans to charge debit card fees, it left Bank of America in a bad position. So they reversed course.

Bank of America will surely be looking to figure out a new way to pass along costs to its customers. The debit fee gambit didn’t work, so now they’ll come up with something else. When they do, we’ll help sound the alarm as to what that is.

Now is still a good time to switch to a credit union if you continue to do business with a Wall Street bank. Credit unions offer lower fees, better rates, and superior customer service. They’re not for profit and owned by their members. They’re the smart, sensible alternative to greedy banks.

Adjacent posts

  • Donate now to support The Cascadia Advocate


    Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.

    Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you: we have never accepted advertising or placements of paid content.

    And we’d like it to stay that way.

    Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.

    Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.

    Become an NPI member Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. We shouldn’t lose sight of how this whole thing got started. All these debit fees banks are now rolling back were introduced in response to the fall in bank revenues from debit card transactions that was the consequence of the passing of the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank bill and the subsequent Federal Reserve ruling to limit debit interchange at $0.22 + 0.05% of the transaction amount.

    Those of us who were paying attention to what was happening knew that this was coming and warned against it.

    What happened was that the government decided that a substantial portion of the banks’ revenues would be collected by retailers. The banks then decided to make up for the shortfall by creating new revenue sources. Is that surprising?

    The bottom line is that the banks will find a way to make up for their lost revenues and their customers (i.e. us) will foot the bill.

    # by J.G. Desi :: November 1st, 2011 at 3:57 PM