NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Friday, September 27th, 2019

Seattle Times shreds Tim Eyman’s I-976 with a powerful editorial urging a NO vote

The Seattle Times Company has just published its position on Tim Eyman’s Initiative 976, urging an emphatic no vote this November, and it’s truly a thing of beauty. Rarely have I read a more satisfying editorial.

This indictment of I-976 is truly a thing of beauty!

“In his latest ballot measure, initiative promoter Tim Eyman is overreaching again,” the editorial begins. “He conjures a fantasy world in which Washington’s transportation infrastructure is complete, efficient and everlasting.”

Fantasy world… love it! The Times is spot-on; it’s as though Eyman is inhabiting some weird alternate universe. He has lately been falsely claiming that I-976 will have no adverse impact because there are billions of dollars lying around that could be used to backfill the cuts. But that’s a total fabrication.

Kudos to The Times for recognizing this.

“The real-life Initiative 976 is a direct threat to Washington’s well-being,” the editorial goes on to note, delving into the grave impacts. “It would cut repairs to streets and bridges of sixty-two districts across the state, delay voter-approved mass transit in mid-construction and cost taxpayers more money in the long run. The statewide transportation budget, including highway construction and the State Patrol, would be shorted $4 billion over the next decade.”

The total loss of revenue over ten years goes even higher when you add in the amount of funding that would be lost at the regional and local levels.

“When The Seattle Times Opinion page recently asked readers to send in their questions about I-976, concerns about the statewide consequences came up repeatedly,” a later passage in the editorial adds.

“Programs that would be stripped of funding can be found in every corner of Washington, including tribal transit, paratransit for people with disabilities and the elderly, and earthquake-proofing of bridges and tunnels.”

“Eyman seems not to care about collateral damage of his mission to “gut” Sound Transit — as he described it to the Eastside Republican Club — through I-976.”

That Eyman address to the Eastside Republican Club was recorded by a friend of NPI and released through our Permanent Defense project earlier this month. It was subsequently picked up on by Times columnist Danny Westneat.

In the audio clip (which you can hear for yourself at PD’s website), Eyman can be heard making the following statement about his primary motivation for spearheading an initiative that slashes vehicle fees (emphasis ours):

I love the idea of every voter in the state being able to register their vehicle for a flat-rate, easy to understand $30, but what gets me giddy is the idea of ripping the heart out of Sound Transit. This agency is so unaccountable, so rogue, so completely devoid of any reality that this is our one chance to be able to gut them like a pig, and that’s what I really love about this initiative.

The best part of the editorial, though, is its conclusion.

“Nothing about I-976 is a good idea, in terms of responsible governance or prudent money management,” the Times declares.

“Eyman asks voters to buy a falsity that there’s some miraculous way to fund our state’s backlog of bridge, road and transit needs.  Because the courts cannot end this toxic nonsense quickly enough, voters must reject I-976 themselves.”


Outstanding, Seattle Times. Simply outstanding. Thank you for making the case against Tim Eyman’s I-976 so well and so powerfully.

Join NPI and the broad coalition working to Keep Washington Rolling in saying NO to Tim Eyman’s I-976 this autumn. Ballots must be returned by November 5th.

Adjacent posts

  • Donate now to support The Cascadia Advocate

    Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.

    Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you: we have never accepted advertising or placements of paid content.

    And we’d like it to stay that way.

    Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.

    Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.

    Become an NPI member Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. I believe that [the purpose of] I-976 is to get back license tab fees for the state ripping everybody off again, with [their] two face standards, it has nothing to do with bridges and roads. Why do we pay $0.70 a gallon for gas taxes, those are for roads and bridges, also on the license tabs are for roads, sales tax is for roads and bridges. This state always finds other things to do with the money that is supposed to go to.

    I’m sure half the money they get will go to building houses for the homeless.

    If the homeless want to do something about their situation they wouldn’t be homeless, they don’t want to work,not when they can get a free handout from the state And or City, The state is good at redirecting funds. No accountability, with the people that are voted in.

    If get a refund I’m going to go to the casino and try and double my money, which the state should be taxing the casinos, but one of our governors let that slide.

    This is just my personal opinion. And if I’ve hurt anybody’s feelings I’m sorry.

    This comment has been edited by NPI for compliance with our Commenting Guidelines.

    # by Randy Amison :: September 27th, 2019 at 7:28 PM

Post a Comment

By submitting a comment using the form below, you acknowledge that you understand and accept the terms of the Northwest Progressive Institute's User Agreement, and you agree to abide by our Commenting Guidelines. We will not publish or share your email address. See our Privacy Promise for more information. Your comment must be submitted with a name and email address as noted below. *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>