Looking back, 2023 was the most challenging year to America’s banking sector since the Great Recession, and the rough patch may unfortunately not be over.
Last March, investors and pundits were shocked by the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). A regional bank located in San Francisco, SVB was thought to represent some of the best and brightest in mid-range financing.
Its financial services and lending practices catered to America’s high-tech companies, and like them, it surrounded itself within an aura of innovation.
Less than two years prior to its collapse, a JP Morgan-Chase analyst declared that the “good times are just beginning” for SVB.
However, as was learned during the subprime loan crisis, genius and leverage are not the same. Taking advantage of the deregulated environment created in the first two years of the Trump regime, along with the seemingly perpetual low interest rates offered by the Federal Reserve, SVB dramatically over-invested in securities, particularly long-term Treasury bonds.
When the value of these securities significantly decreased when the Federal Reserve hiked interest rates to curb inflation, SVB experienced a severe liquidity crisis. As word quickly spread of the bank’s woes on social media, depositors rapidly closed their accounts and the bank collapsed.
SVB was not the only victim of the Federal Reserve’s hikes in interest rates.
Two days later, Signature Bank closed after nervous customers withdrew more than $10 billion in deposits. They were followed by First Republic in May, Heartland Tri-State in July, and then Citizens Bank in November.
First Republic, SVB, and Signature were the second, third, and fourth largest bank collapses in American history respectively; they are only topped by Washington Mutual’s catastrophic mismanagement and collapse in 2008.
To prevent the bank runs from spreading, the Biden administration, the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) agreed to an unprecedented extension of FDIC insurance to all depositors, even those who had deposits over $250,000. Meanwhile the Federal Reserve has openly turned its back on the Trump era deregulation, and is trying to introduce new capital requirements across the banking sector — something that both the regional banks and the large players are aggressively fighting.
Still, regardless of the regulatory framework, regional banks throughout the United States — even ones that have behaved responsibly with depositor’s money—are facing a torrid of issues in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Since the Great Recession, the Federal Reserve has used historically low-interest rates to stimulate the US economy. During the early years of the Trump regime, when it appeared that after a decade of sluggish growth the United States was finally getting back on track, it would have made sense to slightly pump the breaks and modestly increase rates. However, by that time, raising rates had become universally politically unacceptable.
Trump was adamantly opposed, fearing that any slowdown in growth would damage his already beleaguered popularity.
Liberals and progressives were also suspicious, as no one could clearly say we had fully turned the corner on the Great Recession, and if the economy were to stall the chances of a Keynesian style stimulus package making it through Congress — especially when Republicans controlled both houses — seemed nonexistent.
Most critically though, the finance sector was opposed.
The availability of cheap money had created numerous financial bubbles —particularly in cryptocurrencies — that all risked collapsing as soon as investors could not borrow themselves out. In general, everyone became used to an environment where interest rates were kept at rock bottom percentages.
Seemingly overnight, the COVID-19 pandemic changed all of this.
A combination of aggressive — though vital — public expenditures, in addition to supply chain disruptions, a global energy crunch caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and callous corporate price gouging all contributed to the highest inflation rate in the United States since 1981. Fearing the potential for hyperinflation, the Federal Reserve abruptly raised rates. The availability of easy money was over, and the banking sector scrambled to adjust.
In addition to high interest rates, regional and mid-sized banks had to deal with changes in the commercial real estate market. With the explosion of remote workers, the value of office real estate has plummeted.
In December, office spaces were still only 50%-55% occupied when compared to their pre-pandemic levels. With fewer businesses renting office spaces, developers cannot pay back their loans, and defaults are expected to rise. In 2023, major banks had increased their charge off rates greater than what occurred during the pandemic. By the end of 2024, nearly $150 billion in office loans are scheduled to mature, while another $300 billion will come due by the end of 2026.
Since regional and mid-sized banks are the main institutions that make these loans, they are likely to bear the cost of these potentially catastrophic defaults.
The West Coast is particularly vulnerable, with Seattle standing out as an especially weak market. As of November, San Francisco, Seattle, and the Bay Area had some of the highest office vacancy rates in the nation, with 24.2%, 22.3%, and 20.3% respectively. Meanwhile, San Diego, Seattle, and Portland were near the bottom of major cities in sales of office spaces for 2023.
Seattle does have one redeeming quality that could help mitigate its coming turmoil; its downtown population is growing. Ideally, the city’s excess office space could be converted to other uses, such as desperately needed affordable housing.
The cost of housing in Seattle is more than double when compared to the national average, and overall Seattle has the 9th highest cost of living of any city in the United States. The problem is any dramatic redevelopment plan, which would involve massive renovations to transform office spaces into residential units or tearing them down completely and rebuilding from scratch, would require significant financing. Unfortunately, as long as the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates high, access to that financing will be hard to come by.
Americans might feel that the worst of the pandemic is behind them, but the reality is its economic impact is still causing significant waves through the banking sector and will probably be felt for years to come.
Unfortunately, economically speaking, there is a nontrivial possibility that the worst is in front of Americans rather than behind them. After the Great Recession, lawmakers promised that the reforms they instituted secured America’s banking sector. However, as long as the United States sticks to a predominately private banking sector — one that cannot operate counter-cyclically nor dedicate financing to social needs — that promise of long-term security is elusive.
The President will participate in a campaign reception in Medina before heading to Seattle-Tacoma International…
The two pretenders claim to be Democrats, having specified a party preference of "Democratic" in…
Biden spoke for about eighteen minutes at a campaign event held in what was once…
Underneath sunny spring skies, Air Force One landed at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport nearly a whole…
The President's anticipated arrival in Seattle will be close to 6 PM, well into the…
60% of likely November 2024 Emerald City voters don't like Councilmember Sara Nelson's proposal to…