I voted NO. These initiatives are costing us more and more. Eyman banks on the fact that too many people do not know how funding works from the state level to local needs. Monies cannot be simply ‘pulled’ from one fund to another to cover public safety, infrastructure improvements/additions, schools. Washington state is seeing incredible economic growth and we cannot afford to lose funding for our cities and towns because of ignorance and shortsightedness. When you vote away funding, you also lose from the federal level, because many local infrastructure needs also receive federal matching funds to complete projects provided the monies meet or exceed the federal mandates.
— Beth Menstell, explaining why she voted NO on Tim Eyman’s I-1366.
Time's Eric Cortellessa was granted multiple audiences with Donald Trump and wrote a chilling report…
"While court proceedings are likely to delay implementation of the ruling, the political impact was…
Watch highlights from the seventeenth episode of SNL’s forty-ninth season, hosted by Ryan Gosling, with…
The Los Angeles Times' David Lauter reports: "Many of the nation’s richest people said after…
"Sales of the company’s electric cars dropped in the first three months of the year,…
Watch highlights from the fourteenth episode of SNL’s forty-ninth season, hosted by Josh Brolin, with…