ExxonMobil pipeline bursts in Montana, spilling crude oil into Yellowstone River

As if we need­ed anoth­er reminder that the oil indus­try is a dirty industry…

An Exxon­Mo­bil pipeline run­ning under the Yel­low­stone Riv­er in south cen­tral Mon­tana rup­tured late Fri­day, spilling crude oil into the riv­er and forc­ing evacuations.

The pipeline burst about 10 miles west of Billings, coat­ing parts of the Yel­low­stone Riv­er that run past Lau­rel — a town of about 6,500 peo­ple down­stream from the rup­ture — with shiny patch­es of oil. Pre­cise­ly how much oil leaked into the riv­er was still unclear. But through­out the day Sat­ur­day, cleanup crews in Lau­rel worked to lessen the impact of the spill, lay­ing down absorbent sheets along the banks of the riv­er to mop up some of the escaped oil, and mea­sur­ing fumes to deter­mine the health threat.

Of course, Exxon­Mo­bil is very, very, very sor­ry about all of this.

EMP­Co deeply regrets this release and is work­ing hard with local emer­gency author­i­ties to mit­i­gate the impacts of this release on the sur­round­ing com­mu­ni­ties and to the environment.

The release orig­i­nat­ed from a 12″ crude pipeline oper­at­ed by EMP­Co that runs from Sil­ver Tip to Billings. The pipeline has been shut down and the seg­ment where the release occurred has been iso­lat­ed. All appro­pri­ate state and fed­er­al author­i­ties have been alerted.

When a drilling rig blows up, when a pipeline bursts, or when a super­tanker runs aground due to a care­less crew, the ram­i­fi­ca­tions are incred­i­bly destruc­tive. We know because we’ve seen this hap­pen before. Some com­mu­ni­ties have trag­i­cal­ly expe­ri­enced the con­se­quences firsthand.

Each time a dis­as­ter hap­pens, the com­pa­ny respon­si­ble apol­o­gizes and promis­es to clean up its mess and com­pen­sate those affected.

Politi­cians vow to hold the com­pa­ny respon­si­ble account­able and press for tougher safe­ty reg­u­la­tions. But inevitably, none of this talk leads to a safer or clean­er indus­try. Because pre­ventable acci­dents keep happening.

Since humans make mis­takes, drilling (or min­ing) for fos­sil fuels is an inher­ent­ly unsafe busi­ness… a busi­ness that needs to be made illegal.

It is uncon­scionable that we as a coun­try are con­tin­u­ing to enter­tain pro­pos­als by greedy cor­po­ra­tions to blow up more moun­tains, despoil more Arc­tic wilder­ness with rigs, or con­t­a­m­i­nate more aquifers to get dirty fos­sil fuels out of the ground.

We’ve known for decades that oil is a finite resource, one that one last for­ev­er. We’ve known for decades that burn­ing it, along with coal and nat­ur­al gas, releas­es tox­ins into the air. We’ve known for decades that our depen­dence on for­eign oil is harm­ful to the secu­ri­ty and well-being of our country.

And yet, we have done next to noth­ing to tran­si­tion to a clean ener­gy future. There’s been plen­ty of talk, but it has­n’t been backed up with action.

Con­gress has made no seri­ous effort to use our mighty com­mon wealth to fur­ther the devel­op­ment of renew­able energy.

It has not even been able to redi­rect the mon­ey we cur­rent­ly just give away to oil com­pa­nies like Exxon­Mo­bil to renew­able ener­gy research.

What is stand­ing in the way of action? In their 2008 book Apol­lo’s Fire, Jay Inslee and Brack­en Hen­dricks offered the fol­low­ing answer.

The prob­lem is not inad­e­quate infor­ma­tion or insuf­fi­cient sci­en­tif­ic tal­ent. It is not even the relent­less obstruc­tion­ism of vest­ed inter­ests, though we can’t under­es­ti­mate the tenac­i­ty and clev­er­ness of the oil and auto­mo­tive indus­tries and the politi­cians indebt­ed to them. Rather, the prob­lem is an over­abun­dance of fear. Fear that we can­not solve the prob­lem. Fear that we can­not change the course we are on.

Peo­ple have a fine­ly devel­oped inabil­i­ty to ignore prob­lems — like the inevitabil­i­ty of our own death — that we believe we can do noth­ing about. Yet today, we do not have the lux­u­ry of igno­rance. Our shift to a deep and abid­ing hope must be ground­ed in our abil­i­ty to guide the forces of change for human bet­ter­ment, informed by the dan­gers we face but guid­ed by a belief in our own inno­v­a­tive potential.

When Barack Oba­ma won elec­tion to the pres­i­den­cy in 2008, many envi­ron­men­tal activists had high hopes that our back­wards ener­gy pol­i­cy would be reversed, and that con­ser­va­tion would be made a pri­or­i­ty. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion has endorsed plans for more drilling, rather than call­ing for an end to the fos­sil fuel indus­try’s end­less appetite for more projects, whether they be new off­shore rigs, pipelines, or refineries.

Pres­i­dent Oba­ma and his team had an oppor­tu­ni­ty to reeval­u­ate their posi­tion in the after­math of the Deep­wa­ter Hori­zon dis­as­ter, the worst human-caused envi­ron­men­tal calami­ty in the his­to­ry of the Unit­ed States. But the admin­is­tra­tion has still not reversed its posi­tion, even after its own oil spill com­mis­sion found that the dis­as­ter was caused by corner-cutting.

“The imme­di­ate caus­es of the Macon­do well blowout can be traced to a series of  iden­ti­fi­able mis­takes made by BP , Hal­libur­ton, and Transocean that reveal such sys­tem­at­ic fail­ures in risk man­age­ment that they place in doubt the safe­ty cul­ture of the entire indus­try,” wrote the com­mis­sion mem­bers in their final report.

What we want to know is, how can an inher­ent­ly risky, dirty indus­try com­prised of unac­count­able, mon­ey­mak­ing pri­vate gov­ern­ments have a safe­ty cul­ture to begin with? Com­pa­nies like Exxon­Mo­bil do not exist for any noble pur­pose (like improv­ing the human con­di­tion). They exist to make money.

So their pri­or­i­ty can’t be safe­ty. Legal­ly, their pri­or­i­ty has to be mak­ing as much mon­ey for their investors as they can.

As long as the fos­sil fuel indus­try con­tin­ues to oper­ate in this coun­try, we are going to be sub­ject­ed to more envi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ters. The time has come for us to rec­og­nize that our ways are not sus­tain­able, and chan­nel our resources into the devel­op­ment of clean, safe, dis­trib­uted renew­able ener­gy. Only then will inci­dents like this begin to dis­ap­pear from our headlines.

Andrew Villeneuve

Andrew Villeneuve is the founder and executive director of the Northwest Progressive Institute, as well as the founder of NPI's sibling, the Northwest Progressive Foundation. He has worked to advance progressive causes for over two decades as a strategist, speaker, author, and organizer. Andrew is also a cybersecurity expert, a veteran facilitator, a delegate to the Washington State Democratic Central Committee, and a member of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps.

Recent Posts

Next up for the 2 Line: Linking Redmond and Bellevue’s downtowns to Seattle’s via the Homer M. Hadley Memorial Bridge

Perhaps as soon as next year, 2 Line trains will cross Lake Washington, making it…

45 mins ago

The United States Supreme Court might soon give banks another deregulation gift

Depriving states of the means to modestly regulate national banks would further tilt America’s already…

9 hours ago

President Joe Biden will return to Washington State at the end of Filing Week

Biden will headline a reception for the Biden Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee, and…

3 days ago

An unspoiled Arctic Alaskan wilderness gets a reprieve after Biden White House nixes drilling and road-building projects

The administration's action keeps roads out of the Brooks Range and lands of the caribou…

4 days ago

Watch the 2 Line ribbon cutting speaking program and read comments from regional leaders on light rail’s Eastside debut

Couldn't join the opening festivities on Saturday, April 27th? Replay the speaking program on-demand and…

7 days ago

Sound Transit opens East Link / 2 Line to high interest and enthusiastic ridership

The Puget Sound region's second light rail line opened to riders on Saturday, April 27th,…

1 week ago