Crosscut's self-inflicted wound
Carl eviscerates the editor of Crosscut over this ridiculous piece about John McKay.
Note to Crosscut: it's 2007, and as Carl points out, most of the people who have determined there was no basis for fraud indictments are Republicans.
Here we are, a year away from a new gubernatorial election, and at least one journalist is still carrying water for the conspiracy crowd.
I guess it doesn't matter how many different officials, judges and investigators came to the same basic conclusion. Sad. Although we might add we're relatively confident McKay can more than take care of himself.
Note to Crosscut: it's 2007, and as Carl points out, most of the people who have determined there was no basis for fraud indictments are Republicans.
Here we are, a year away from a new gubernatorial election, and at least one journalist is still carrying water for the conspiracy crowd.
I guess it doesn't matter how many different officials, judges and investigators came to the same basic conclusion. Sad. Although we might add we're relatively confident McKay can more than take care of himself.
