NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, March 1st, 2022

Washington State Senate passes two critically important gun safety bills in evening session

A pair of extreme­ly impor­tant, much need­ed gun safe­ty bills pre­vi­ous­ly approved by the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives each received con­sti­tu­tion­al majori­ties in the Wash­ing­ton State Sen­ate tonight and are one step clos­er to becom­ing laws.

House Bill 1630, which pro­hibits the car­ry­ing of weapons at local gov­ern­ment meet­ing facil­i­ties and elec­tion sites, passed the Sen­ate with a vote of 28 to 20, while House Bill 1705, which would tough­en state laws to pro­tect Wash­ing­to­ni­ans against untrace­able “ghost” guns, passed the Sen­ate with a vote of 26 to 23.

66% of Wash­ing­to­ni­ans sur­veyed for NPI two weeks ago sup­port HB 1630, with a major­i­ty of the respon­dents strong­ly sup­port­ive. We released that poll find­ing about one week ago, on the day HB 1630 had its Sen­ate pub­lic hearing.

Although HB 1630 has sup­port among vot­ers of all ide­olo­gies and all regions of the state accord­ing to our research, Repub­li­cans in the Sen­ate refused to sup­port the bill, and it passed with Demo­c­ra­t­ic votes only.

The roll call on HB 1630 was as follows:

Roll Call
HB 1630
Weapons/certain meetings
3rd Read­ing & Final Pas­sage as Amend­ed by the Senate

Yeas: 28; Nays: 20; Absent: 1

Vot­ing Yea: Sen­a­tors Bil­lig, Car­lyle, Cleve­land, Con­way, Das, Dhin­gra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keis­er, Kud­er­er, Liias, Lovelett, Lovick, Mul­let, Nguyen, Nobles, Ped­er­sen, Ran­dall, Robin­son, Rolfes, Sal­daña, Salomon, Stan­ford, Trudeau, Van De Wege, Well­man, Wil­son (Claire)

Vot­ing Nay: Sen­a­tors Braun, Brown, Dozi­er, For­tu­na­to, Gildon, Hawkins, Holy, Hon­ey­ford, King, McCune, Muz­za­ll, Pad­den, Schoesler, Sefzik, Shel­don, Short, Wag­oner, War­nick, Wil­son (Jeff), Wil­son (Lyn­da)

Absent: Sen­a­tor Rivers

Sen­a­tor Ann Rivers was the only sen­a­tor who did not cast a vote.

Due to hav­ing been amend­ed in the Sen­ate, the bill now goes back to the House. The House can ask the Sen­ate to recede from its amend­ments, or it can con­cur in the amend­ments and send the bill to Gov­er­nor Inslee. If the House asks the Sen­ate to recede and it refus­es to, the bill would be sub­ject­ed to the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee process to rec­on­cile the dif­fer­ences between the two chambers.

The Demo­c­ra­t­ic cau­cus did not stay ful­ly unit­ed on HB 1705, the “ghost gun” bill, which would restrict the man­u­fac­ture, assem­bly, sale, trans­fer, pur­chase, pos­ses­sion, and receipt of untrace­able firearms, along with the sale, trans­fer, pur­chase, trans­port, and receipt of unfin­ished frames and receivers.

The roll call on HB 1705 was as follows:

Roll Call
HB 1705
Untrace­able guns
3rd Read­ing & Final Passage

Yeas: 26; Nays: 23

Vot­ing Yea: Sen­a­tors Bil­lig, Car­lyle, Cleve­land, Con­way, Das, Dhin­gra, Frockt, Hasegawa, Hunt, Keis­er, Kud­er­er, Liias, Lovelett, Lovick, Mul­let, Nguyen, Nobles, Ped­er­sen, Robin­son, Rolfes, Sal­daña, Salomon, Stan­ford, Trudeau, Well­man, Wil­son, C.

Vot­ing Nay: Sen­a­tors Braun, Brown, Dozi­er, For­tu­na­to, Gildon, Hawkins, Holy, Hon­ey­ford, King, McCune, Muz­za­ll, Pad­den, Ran­dall, Rivers, Schoesler, Sefzik, Shel­don, Short, Van De Wege, Wag­oner, War­nick, Wil­son, J., Wil­son, L.

As with HB 1630, HB 1705 was opposed by the Repub­li­can caucus.

Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tors Kevin Van De Wege (D‑24th Dis­trict: Olympia Penin­su­la) and Emi­ly Ran­dall (D‑26th Dis­trict: North Pierce Coun­ty, South Kit­sap Coun­ty) joined them in vot­ing no. Sen­a­tor Van De Wege is from a rur­al coastal dis­trict with an elec­torate where there are a high­er num­ber of gun enthu­si­asts than oth­er leg­isla­tive dis­tricts rep­re­sent­ed by Democ­rats. Sen­a­tor Ran­dall is a front­line mem­ber fac­ing a tough reelec­tion cam­paign. As the Sen­ate only need­ed twen­ty-five votes to pass the bill, their oppo­si­tion was not a prob­lem for HB 1705.

HB 1705 was­n’t amend­ed in the Sen­ate — a num­ber of amend­ments offered by Repub­li­cans like Phil For­tu­na­to and Kei­th Wag­oner were reject­ed in floor debate — so the bill now heads to Gov­er­nor Inslee to be signed into law.

NPI con­grat­u­lates the Sen­ate on the pas­sage of these his­toric and much need­ed gun safe­ty bills. Con­trary to what Sen­a­tor Ron Muz­za­ll and oth­er Repub­li­cans said in floor debate tonight, these new laws will make a dif­fer­ence for Wash­ing­ton’s fam­i­lies and com­mu­ni­ties. Gun vio­lence is pre­ventable, but only if we work togeth­er to make pro­tect­ing each oth­er a pri­or­i­ty. That is what these new laws will do. They pro­vide tools with with we can pro­tect our­selves and each other.

No Wash­ing­ton­ian needs an untrace­able gun, and no Wash­ing­ton­ian should be bring­ing weapons to a local gov­ern­ment meet­ing. These new gun safe­ty laws will make our com­mu­ni­ties safer and hap­pi­er. Every Wash­ing­ton­ian deserves a healthy and peace­ful future that’s free of gun vio­lence and its horrors.

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation

    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation


  1. Crim­i­nals don’t care about gun laws. All they are doing is pre­vent­ing law abid­ing cit­i­zens from pro­tect­ing them­selves the way that they see fit. You will not be any safer. If you want to be safer, you should learn how to use a gun and get your CHL so you can car­ry any­where you need to in order to pro­tect your­self. Ask­ing a law to pro­tect you is not smart. Stop giv­ing up your right to pro­tect yourself.

    # by Jonathan R. :: March 3rd, 2022 at 1:42 PM
  2. Tak­ing law-abid­ing cit­i­zens’ rights away from them will nev­er make you safer. It only cause crim­i­nals more free­dom to cause more problems.

    # by Philip Kuhn :: March 4th, 2022 at 5:33 PM
  3. If only these politi­cians would make mur­der ille­gal, then no one would com­mit mur­der because crim­i­nals always fol­low laws. They don’t care about the lives of cit­i­zens. They don’t care about safe com­mu­ni­ties. They just care about the agen­da and who funds them. Politi­cians doing pol­i­tics. Our fore­fa­thers would be ashamed.

    # by Cole S. :: March 24th, 2022 at 6:48 PM
    • Our fore­fa­thers would be ashamed.

      They would cer­tain­ly be aghast at the behav­ior of many in the mod­ern right wing, who have no hon­or and no com­mit­ment to the val­ues on prin­ci­ples on which the coun­try was found­ed, includ­ing those expressed in the Pre­am­ble (form a more per­fect Union, estab­lish Jus­tice, insure domes­tic Tran­quil­i­ty, pro­vide for the com­mon defence, pro­mote the gen­er­al Wel­fare, and secure the Bless­ings of Lib­er­ty to our­selves and our Posterity). 

      As for gun safe­ty laws: Our founders actu­al­ly believed that firearms should be reg­u­lat­ed, as this 2017 post from The Con­ver­sa­tion explains:

      I have been research­ing and writ­ing about the his­to­ry of gun reg­u­la­tion and the Sec­ond Amend­ment for the past two decades. When I began this research, most peo­ple assumed that reg­u­la­tion was a rel­a­tive­ly recent phe­nom­e­non, some­thing asso­ci­at­ed with the rise of big gov­ern­ment in the mod­ern era. Actu­al­ly, while the found­ing gen­er­a­tion cer­tain­ly esteemed the idea of an armed pop­u­la­tion, they were also ardent sup­port­ers of gun regulations.

      It real­ly helps to have a prop­er under­stand­ing of history!

      If only these politi­cians would make mur­der ille­gal, then no one would com­mit mur­der because crim­i­nals always fol­low laws. 

      Not sure what point you are try­ing to make here. 

      If you think laws are point­less because crim­i­nals don’t fol­low them, should mur­der be legal? Crim­i­nals don’t fol­low laws, there­fore we should not crim­i­nal­ize ______ is an absurd argu­ment, and one that right wingers don’t actu­al­ly believe in them­selves (or else they would­n’t be try­ing to out­law repro­duc­tive healthcare).

      # by Andrew Villeneuve :: March 25th, 2022 at 3:54 PM
  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: