Adjacent posts
Ideas for what to read next
Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation
Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.
Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you and trusted sponsors. We don’t run ads or publish content in exchange for money.
Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available to all by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.
Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.
Tuesday, November 5th, 2019
Voters give thumbs up to amendment to make Washington State more earthquake-ready
Early returns in the November 2019 general election indicate that Senate Joint Resolution 8200 (SJR 8200) will easily be approved by Washington State voters.
If passed, SJR 8200 would amend the Washington State Constitution to allow the state’s emergency powers to be invoked in the event of a “catastrophic incident”, as opposed to merely an “enemy attack” (which is the only scenario contemplated in the Constitution’s existing language.)
The amendment would authorize the Washington Legislature to pass bills addressing the succession of powers and duties of elected officials to allow for “continuity of state and local governmental operations.”
The amendment received the support of large bipartisan majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. It was sponsored by Dean Takko (D‑19th District: Southwest Washington), who serves on the Senate’s State Government Committee alongside senators like Sam Hunt and Patty Kuderer.
Takko has argued that the amendment is necessary to help Washington prepare for a major earthquake. The possible devastation that a massive tremblor could cause was memorably discussed in a 2015 New Yorker article, The Really Big One:
“I grew up between the mouth of the Columbia River and Aberdeen. That’s ground zero for the Cascadia Subduction Zone,” Takko said at the time the amendment and a companion bill were being considered in the Legislature. “We hate to think of a big earthquake coming, but we’re past due for one. If the worst does come and we have an earthquake, volcanic eruption, or tsunami, this measure will allow us to have a functional government when people will need help the most.
“Last year, this issue got hung up on the last day of session,” Takko recalled.
“I’m glad that the House has moved earlier this year.”
Opponents of SJR 8200 fear that the amendment could allow the state’s emergency powers to be more easily misused, while proponents have pointed out that it makes no sense to have emergency powers that can only be invoked in the event of a war but not a more likely emergency scenario such as an earthquake. Voters have clearly found the latter argument persuasive.
# Written by Caitlin Harrington :: 9:15 PM
Categories: Elections, Policy Topics, Public Planning
Tags: Emergency Preparedness, WA-Ballot
Comments and pings are currently closed.