The Bone and Sinew of the Land by Ana-Lisa Cox (Hardcover, PublicAffairs, 304 pages)

When it so hap­pens — more reg­u­lar­ly now than before but nev­er yet reg­u­lar enough — that a cheap zinc or bronze cast of some semi-famous slaver is yanked from its pedestal in the mid­dle of a city night, or when a sub­ur­ban school board in broad day­light votes to no longer com­pel stu­dents to adorn their bod­ies with the name and imagery of a par­tic­u­lar child traf­fick­er, invari­ably there ris­es the cry:

“You’re eras­ing his­to­ry! You’re cen­sor­ing our Con­fed­er­ate past! You’re rewrit­ing col­lec­tive mem­o­ry to san­i­tize it!”

This, of course, is worse than non­sense and akin to defend­ing the main­te­nance of NAM­BLA-installed plaques to Jer­ry Sandusky.

It should be regard­ed as such whether it’s an argu­ment being made by angry, open big­ots in Face­book com­ment sec­tions or under the aus­pices of the Nation­al Review.

But some wor­thy por­tions of our his­to­ry have indeed been buried, erased, and min­i­mized. Har­vard’s Anna-Lisa Cox’s lat­est book The Bone and Sinew of the Land is an exam­ple of what it actu­al­ly looks like when that sort of his­to­ry is exca­vat­ed for a pop­u­lar audi­ence, and what a pos­i­tive effect that can have.

The Bone and Sinew of the Land by Ana-Lisa Cox (Hard­cov­er, Pub­li­cAf­fairs, 304 pages)

Now, I knew going in I was read­ing a book about “Amer­i­ca’s For­got­ten Black Pio­neers & the Strug­gle for Equal­i­ty” but I was blind­sided when that book was­n’t set in the West dur­ing Recon­struc­tion but in the Old North­west and lat­er states between the 1787 and 1860.

Cox puts it into scale like this: more than 63,000 black Amer­i­cans lived in those ter­ri­to­ries in 1863, enough to qual­i­fy for their own state if they were all in one place. They were the largest pop­u­la­tion of free African-descend­ed peo­ple out­side of Haiti.

Stan­dard pub­lic school edu­ca­tion tends to teach his­to­ry as fun­da­men­tal­ly pro­gres­sive, includ­ing dur­ing Black His­to­ry Month.

But Cox details how con­di­tions wors­ened for black Amer­i­cans in those ter­ri­to­ries and states over time, from the promise that area would be entire­ly free of slav­ery and assump­tion any male who owned at least fifty acres could vote regard­less of race to the reg­u­lar anti-black pogroms in cities like Cincin­nati and pro­to-Black Codes mak­ing it impos­si­ble for black peo­ple to give tes­ti­mo­ny against whites in court.

This is all com­pelling enough on its own in broad strokes, but Cox also did research in-depth on par­tic­u­lar peo­ple and fam­i­lies affect­ed by new devel­op­ments, high­light­ing the per­son­al stakes for peo­ple involved. Ta-Nah­e­si Coates’ “The Case for Repa­ra­tions” inten­tion­al­ly leaves aside the harm caused by slav­ery direct­ly, but the aver­age enslaved man could be worth $150,000 in today’s mon­ey as prop­er­ty. Enslaved peo­ple rep­re­sent­ed up to half of all South­ern wealth.

Yet pri­or to the Civ­il War, an enslaved per­son­’s own val­ue was not only of no use to them but a debt to over­come. They had to lit­er­al­ly pay for their own flesh to be con­sid­ered free, typ­i­cal­ly at exor­bi­tant rates and some­times their slaver would still attempt to sell them away after get­ting the money.

They had to pay to get their fam­i­ly mem­bers out of slave soci­ety, risk­ing legal re-enslave­ment if they remained longer than six months.

After sur­viv­ing bru­tal con­di­tions like pick­ing cot­ton in the deep South or the Salt Springs of Illi­nois and achiev­ing their free­dom, black Amer­i­cans still had to sur­vive on their home­steading plot of land with all the typ­i­cal chal­lenges of remov­ing boul­ders and plow­ing, or make do in a city where any pover­ty was proof they weren’t fit to be free and any sign of pros­per­i­ty incensed whites to come burn their part of town.

Attack­ing free black peo­ple with artillery and bombs in Cincin­nati in 1841 was an act repeat­ed lat­er in Tul­sa, Okla­homa in 1921, the MOVE bomb­ing in Philadel­phia in 1985, the mil­i­ta­rized police aggres­sion in Fer­gu­son, Mo. in 2014, gassing peo­ple in their own backyards.

The sto­ry Cox tells cul­mi­nates in the hero­ic stand of the Lyles fam­i­ly in 1857 against a white mob, led by the local law enforce­ment who came to try to lynch the pros­per­ous black fam­i­ly in their home after the fam­i­ly had attempt­ed to recov­er stolen hogs from white rustlers tar­get­ing them.

The Lyles defend­ed them­selves in a bloody attack but were forced to move away. How­ev­er, they refused to sell their land and leased it to some white allies instead, mov­ing back after the Civ­il War and found­ing Lyles Sta­tion.

For all this stacked against them, there were hun­dreds of free, black Amer­i­can fam­i­lies who achieved the Amer­i­can dream of own­ing at least two hun­dred acres of prop­er­ty, and Union recruiters knew where to go to look for black enlis­tees dur­ing the Civ­il War. This is the sto­ry Cox tells.

The book’s title refers to a res­o­lu­tion from an 1843 con­ven­tion of black Michi­gan­ders: “Where­as agri­cul­ture is the bone and sinew of our coun­try: There­fore be it resolved, that we rec­om­mend it to our peo­ple as best cal­cu­lat­ed to pro­mote their rise and progress in this State.”

Most of their white neigh­bors resolved to do every­thing pos­si­ble to pre­vent that.

The game is crooked, and it always has been, but it’s the only game in town, and to under­stand the present, we need to under­stand the past instead of for­get­ting it or accept­ing hate­ful revi­sion­ist his­to­ry as truth.

Cox’s book is a great step in that direction.

Adjacent posts