NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, June 14th, 2016

Hillary Clinton wins the District of Columbia’s Democratic primary in a landslide

The 2016 nom­i­nat­ing sea­son will end on a high note for pre­sump­tive Demo­c­ra­t­ic nom­i­nee Hillary Clin­ton with a land­slide vic­to­ry in the Dis­trict of Columbi­a’s Demo­c­ra­t­ic pres­i­den­tial pri­ma­ry, which was held today in our nation’s cap­i­tal.

Of 85,949 total bal­lots cast, Hillary Clin­ton received 66,796 votes — a per­cent­age of 77.72%. Bernie Sanders received 17,550 votes, or 20.8%.

“We just won Wash­ing­ton, D.C.! Grate­ful to every­one who vot­ed,” tweet­ed Clin­ton’s cam­paign, attach­ing a pho­to of a beam­ing Clin­ton work­ing a rope line.

Sanders’ cam­paign has not com­ment­ed on the results.

The D.C. Demo­c­ra­t­ic pri­ma­ry was the very last con­test left on the cal­en­dar. Now that it has con­clud­ed, the cam­paigns of Hillary Clin­ton and Bernie Sanders will be focus­ing on get­ting ready for the con­ven­tion.

The two can­di­dates are hav­ing a closed door meet­ing tonight to dis­cuss how to defeat Don­ald Trump and uni­fy the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty.

In advance of the meet­ing, Sanders held a press con­fer­ence call­ing for new lead­er­ship at the DNC (he wants Deb­bie Wasser­man Schultz out), a com­mit­ment to do away with “superdel­e­gates”, a com­mit­ment that open pri­maries be used in future pres­i­den­tial cycles, and a robust, pro­gres­sive plat­form.

It is worth not­ing that the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty’s cur­rent rules actu­al­ly allow for open pri­maries. It is up to each state and ter­ri­to­r­i­al par­ty to decide what method it would like to use to allo­cate its nation­al con­ven­tion del­e­gates.

Each juris­dic­tion does things dif­fer­ent­ly. Some states, like Wis­con­sin, hold open pri­maries; some, like Ore­gon, hold closed pri­maries. Oth­ers, like Wash­ing­ton and Ida­ho, uti­lize cau­cus­es. Still oth­ers use con­ven­tions. The process that each juris­dic­tion uses is spelled out in its Del­e­gate Selec­tion and Affir­ma­tive Action Plan. The state or ter­ri­to­r­i­al par­ty drafts the plan, which iden­ti­fies the method by which del­e­gates will be allo­cat­ed, and sub­mits it to the DNC for rat­i­fi­ca­tion.

Any attempt to change nation­al par­ty rules to com­pel state and ter­ri­to­r­i­al par­ties to use a cer­tain method (e.g. open pri­maries) next time around is almost cer­tain to fail. Oppo­nents will point out it goes against the idea of a par­ty gov­erned from the bot­tom up, because it would deny state and ter­ri­to­r­i­al par­ties the free­dom to decide what sys­tem would work best for them in a giv­en cycle.

With respect to rules changes, Sanders would do well to focus on try­ing to get rid of so-called superdel­e­gates, which is prob­a­bly more achiev­able. There is a grow­ing con­sen­sus among the par­ty’s grass­roots that “superdel­e­gates” are unnec­es­sary, and even some in the par­ty estab­lish­ment share this view.

(For instance, Con­gress­man Adam Smith, one of Wash­ing­ton’s six Demo­c­ra­t­ic U.S. Rep­re­sen­ta­tives, has fre­quent­ly remarked that he does­n’t see a need for superdel­e­gates, and would be hap­py to do away with them.)

In about a month, the Repub­li­can Nation­al Con­ven­tion will take place in Cleve­land, Ohio, fol­lowed a week lat­er by the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion in Philadel­phia, Penn­syl­va­nia. NPI will pro­vide live analy­sis of both con­ven­tions here on the Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate and on The Advo­cate’s sis­ter pub­li­ca­tion, In Brief.

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation


    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local pol­i­tics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for mon­ey.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy jour­nal­ism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time dona­tion

One Comment

  1. Even though they are dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed in many ways. Bernie and Hilary seem like they can ham­mer out an agree­ment.

    # by Mike Barer :: June 14th, 2016 at 11:02 PM