NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Thursday, August 13th, 2015

Connecticut’s Supreme Court puts an end to all executions in the Nutmeg State

This is a great vic­to­ry for human rights that deserves to be cel­e­brat­ed:

After a sweep­ing two-year review, the state Supreme Court out­lawed cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in Con­necti­cut, say­ing the state’s death penal­ty no longer com­ports with evolved soci­etal val­ues and serves no valid pur­pose as pun­ish­ment.

The 4–3 deci­sion would remove 11 con­victs from Con­necti­cut’s death row and over­turn the lat­est iter­a­tion of the state’s death penal­ty, a polit­i­cal com­pro­mise effec­tive April 2012 that halt­ed exe­cu­tions going for­ward but allowed death sen­tences to be imposed on the inmates already sen­tenced.

The major­i­ty deci­sion, writ­ten by Jus­tice Richard N. Palmer, found a host of flaws in the death penal­ty law, which banned “prospec­tive” death sen­tences, those imposed after the effec­tive date of the law. But the major­i­ty wrote that it chose to ana­lyze cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and impose abo­li­tion from a broad per­spec­tive.

Killing peo­ple as a pun­ish­ment for the com­mis­sion of a crime is bar­bar­ic, and we’re glad that death row in Con­necti­cut is being shut down for good.

The Con­necti­cut Supreme Court found that the death penal­ty is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al under the Nut­meg State’s own con­sti­tu­tion, which means there aren’t grounds for an appeal to the Unit­ed States Supreme Court. (It is a gen­er­al­ly held prin­ci­ple of con­sti­tu­tion­al law that state con­sti­tu­tions may pro­vide addi­tion­al rights and lib­er­ties beyond what the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion pro­vides, but they can­not pro­vide less).

The deci­sion leaves New Hamp­shire as the only state in New Eng­land where the death penal­ty remains in effect. With the excep­tion of Alas­ka and Hawaii, no state west of the Rock­ies has abol­ished the death penal­ty, unless New Mex­i­co is count­ed. We have work to do on that front here in the Pacif­ic North­west.

Gov­er­nor Jay Inslee has declared a mora­to­ri­um on the death penal­ty (to the con­ster­na­tion of many Repub­li­cans, who want the state to kill its death-row pris­on­ers despite claim­ing to be “pro-life”), but a mora­to­ri­um is not abo­li­tion.

There are cur­rent­ly nine inmates on death row in Wash­ing­ton, eleven in Ida­ho, and thir­ty-four in Ore­gon. Neigh­bor­ing Mon­tana only has two.

Across the Unit­ed States, the total num­ber stands at three thou­sand.

Yes, you read that cor­rect­ly: Close to three thou­sand peo­ple have had death sen­tences pro­nounced upon them by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment or a state gov­ern­ment and are wait­ing to be killed. This is the Unit­ed States, the sup­posed bea­con of free­dom, lib­er­ty, and human rights, and we’ve got three thou­sand peo­ple sit­ting in pris­ons who have been con­demned to death! How can we lec­ture oth­er coun­tries about human rights when we don’t prac­tice what we preach our­selves?

It is worth not­ing that Wash­ing­ton and Ida­ho have each had one inno­cent per­son — yes, one inno­cent per­son — exon­er­at­ed and freed from death row after it was proven they did not com­mit the crime for which they were to be killed.

The strug­gle for abo­li­tion must and will con­tin­ue in this coun­try.

If Nebras­ka can abol­ish the death penal­ty, as it recent­ly did, sure­ly we here in Wash­ing­ton and Ore­gon (and Ida­ho) can do it too. It won’t be easy, but it is a just and moral cause that we must reded­i­cate our­selves to.

For more infor­ma­tion:

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation


    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local pol­i­tics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for mon­ey.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy jour­nal­ism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time dona­tion