Every year since 1976, Michigan’s Lake Superior State University has released a thoughtful and humorous “List of Words Banished from the Queen’s English for Misuse, Overuse and General Uselessness”. Here is the 2015 (and fortieth annual) edition, for your reading enjoyment on this New Year’s Day:
BAE — One of the top nominees.
“Meaning ‘before anyone else.’ How stupid! Stop calling your boyfriend ‘bae’.” — Evie Dunagan, Manheim, Penn.
“It’s overused. I heard someone refer to their ramen noodles as ‘bae’! If I was putting someone ‘before anything else,’ I would respect them enough to use their name.” — S. Thoms, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.
“The most annoying term of affection to show up in years. Also, the concept ‘before anybody else,’ developed AFTER the word became popular. Reason enough for it to be banned. – Blan Wright, Sugar Hill, Ga.
“A dumb, annoying word.” — James Becker, Holly, Mich.
“I’d rather be called ‘babe’ than ‘bae’ any day.” — Alexsis Outwater, Bronson, Mich.
POLAR VORTEX — LSSU got a head start on this one last spring, when it burned a snowman named Mr. Polar Vortex during its 44th annual Snowman Burning.
“Wasn’t it called ‘winter’ just a few years ago? — Dawn Farrell, Kanata, Ont., Canada
“Enough with the over-sensationalized words to describe weather!” — A. Prescott, Oshawa, Ont., Canada
“I think most, if not all can agree that we would prefer to avoid the polar vortex in the future, both in name and in embodiment.” — Christine Brace, Westminster, Md.
“What happened to ‘cold snap’? Not descriptive enough?” –Trevor Fenton, Edinburgh, U.K.
Kenneth Ross of Glastonbury, Conn., and Bob Priddy of Jefferson City, Mo., were among many who saw this storming in last January.
“Less than a week into the new year and it’s the most overused, meaningless word in the media,” said Ross.
Priddy noted that it quickly jumped from the weather forecast to other areas, as he said he knew it would: “Today’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorializes about a ‘political vortex.’ ”
HACK — Banished for over-use and mis-use.
“Suddenly things that once would have been called ‘tips’ are now being called ‘hacks.’ It can’t be because the one word is shorter or easier to say; and the actual accepted meanings of ‘hack’ have nothing to do with suggestions for doing tasks better or more efficiently — quite the opposite, really.” – Sharla Hulsey, Sac City, Iowa.
“This word is totally over-used and mis-used. What they really mean is ‘tip’ or ‘short cut,’ but clearly it is not a ‘hack,’ as it involves no legal or ethical impropriety or breach of security.” – Peter P. Nieckarz Jr., Sylva, N.C.
“I just received an e‑mail for a book called ‘Marriage Hacks.’ I have seen articles about life hacks, home improvement hacks, car hacks, furniture hacks, painting hacks, work hacks and pretty much any other hack you can think of. There are probably even hacking hacks.” – Chellsea Mastroine, Canton, Ohio.
“Life hack, this hack, that hack…stop with the hacks!” — Tim Jackson, Crystal Lake, Ill.
SKILL SET — “Why use two words when one will do? We already have a perfectly good word in ‘skills’ (ending with an s, not a z).” – Chip Lupo, Columbia, S.C.
“A skill is a skill — that is it. Phrases such as ‘I have the skill set to do that properly’ or anything resembling that phrase, shows the speaker is seriously lacking skills in the art of conversation. Please try this, ‘I have the skill… do you have the skills… this requires certain skills… he is very skilled… that was a skillful maneuver… See? No need for a skill set.” – Stephanie Hamm-Wieczkiewicz, Litfield Park, Ariz.
SWAG — Many nominations over the years.
“The word ‘swag’ has become a shapeless, meaningless word used in various forms (such as ‘swaggy’) but with no real depth.” – Bailey Anderson, Washington, Iowa.
“Whether it’s a ‘free gift’ (banished in 1988) or droopy clothing, this word is neither useful nor fancy.” – Jeff Drake, Saint Albans, West Va.
“The word has become so overused that it is not ‘swag’ to not use the word ‘swag.’ ” – Devin, Farwell, Mich.
“Because I am tired of hearing swag to describe anything on the face of the planet. By the way, your website is so ‘swag.’ ” – Alex, Roanoke, Va.
FOODIE — Many nominations over the past several years. Is it a Michigan thing?
“It’s ridiculous. Do we call people who like wine ‘winies’ or beer lovers ‘beeries’?” – Randall Chamberlain, Traverse City, Mich.
“ ‘Someone who enjoys food’ applies to everyone on Earth. What’s next? ‘Oh, I’m an airie; I just love to breathe.’ ‘Could we do it at 11, instead? I’m kind of a sleepie.’ ” – Andy Poe, Marquette, Mich.
“I crave good sleep, too, but that does not make me a sleepie. News flash: We ALL like food.” – Graydeon DeCamp, Elk Rapids, Mich.
“I’ve heard of cooks and chefs, and gourmets and gourmands, but what the heck is a ‘foodie’? A person who likes food? A person who eats food? A person who knows what food is? Sounds like ‘foodie’ is a synonym for ‘everybody.’ Foodies around the world agree; let’s banish this term.” – Steve Szilagyi, Mason, Mich.
CURATE / CURATED — “It used to have a special significance reserved mainly for fine art and museums. Now everything is curated. Monthly food and clothing subscription boxes claim to be finely ‘curated.’ Instead of abusing curated, why don’t they say what they really mean: ‘We did an online search and posted the first 25 items we found’ or the ‘curated selection of items in your box this month are a mix of paid placements and products that have failed to sell elsewhere.’ ” – Samantha McCormick, Kirkland, Wash.
“Example on the ‘Net today: ‘Get a curated box of high-end treats and toys (all tailored to the size of your pup) shipped right to your doggie door.’ — I have heard and read the word ‘curated’ far too many times this year.” – Deb, Portland, Ore.
“A pretentious way of saying ‘selected.’ It’s enormously overused.” – Kristi Hoerauf, San Francisco, Calif.
FRIEND-RAISING — “A horrible word that conflates the real meaning of friendship with usually hidden motivations to get at the other person’s pockets.” – Mary Been, Sidnaw, Mich.
“The word suggests that we develop relationships not for the simple value of the person we call ‘friend,’ for the pleasure of being in a community of people and for the simple joys of sharing bonds of affection and common care, but that we instead develop these relationships out of some sort of expectation of a monetary reward.” – Collette Coullard, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.
CRA-CRA — That’s just crazy.
Early in 2014, Steve Kaufman of Houston, Tex., could be heard screaming, “I’ve only heard it twice and already know by the end of the year I’ll want to scream.”
“Short-form for ‘crazy’ and sometimes just one ‘cra.’ I hear kids (including my 6 yr. old) saying it all the time, e.g. ‘That snowstorm yesterday was ‘cra-cra.’ ” – Esther Proulx, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.
“I’m sick of hearing myself say this! Must be banned!” – Roxanne Werly, Traverse City, Mich.
ENHANCED INTERROGATION — “A shameful euphemism for torture.” – David Bristol, Byron Center, Mich.
TAKEAWAY — “It’s used all too frequently on news programs, as in, ‘What is your ‘takeaway’ on (a given situation.’ ‘What is our ‘takeaway’ on Congress’ vote?’ ‘Is there any ‘takeaway’ on the recent riots?’ I have heard Jon Stewart use it. I’ve heard Charlie Rose use it, as well as countless numbers of news talking heads, usually for all the wrong reasons. For me, a takeaway is a sports term, where one team is controlling the ball (or puck) and the other steals it, or took it away — a ‘takeaway.’ In the U.K., ‘takeaway’ food is known as ‘to go’ here in the Colonies. – John Prokop, Oakland, Calif.
-NATION — A suffering sports suffix.
“Purely with reference to a specific teams’ fans, this word needs to go. It’s the following of a sports franchise, not a group seeking independence, recognition and legitimacy; Not even if it’s the Cubs.” – Tim Wilcox, Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. Canada
“Although a devout Wisconsin sports fan, I do not belong to Packer-Nation, Badger-Nation, Phoenix-Nation, or Brewer-Nation. Further, I am not aware of any team or mascot that has the carrying capacity to be a nation.” – Kelly Frawley, Waunakee, Wisc.
“Nothing more self-aggrandizing than sport team fans referring to themselves as a nation! What’s next? My team — Continent, World, Galaxy, Universe!” – Curt Chambers, Seattle, Wash.
“Both politics and sports teams have overused this n‑word to describe their fans or viewers.” – Ken Hornack, Ormond Beach, Fla.
Lists for previous years are available on Lake Superior’s site.
This is a compelling list; kudos to LSSU for a job well done. We’re very pleased to see enhanced interrogation (a Bush/Chenyism) included. It should have been banished a decade ago or more. Ah, well… better late than never.
Foodie, swag, hack, and bae are also very deserving of banishment.
We’d complete the list by adding several more obnoxious phrases that we’d like to see banished for overuse, misuse and general uselessness:
CHIPPY — Heard frequently during broadcasts of hockey games. It refers to unsportsmanlike, belligerent play characterized by fights and ejections. Chippy also has a number of other meanings, especially according to Urban Dictionary. What’s wrong with rough? It’s a perfectly serviceable word that most people understand.
(IF YOU) WORK HARD AND PLAY BY THE RULES… — This tired mantra seems to get recycled every year at election time by Democratic consultants and strategists. Popularized in the 1990s by Bill Clinton, it keeps finding its way into the speeches of Democratic candidates, and it needs to be banished. The reality is, the rules are rigged, and Americans don’t need to be admonished to work hard… they already do!
As Kevin Carson aptly noted, “The only people who get rich playing by the rules are the people who make the rules.” Anat Shenker-Osorio adds in Don’t Buy It: “The world works differently for each person depending on race, class, gender, geography, place of birth, and sexual orientation. Yet, by using the phrase play by the rules, we insist on preserving the fantasy that meritocracy determines success in America.”
INTERNET OF THINGS — This annoying buzzphrase, promoted by futurists, refers to the idea that appliances and gadgets of all kinds will increasingly be linked together and accessible over the Internet, whether they be thermostats, refrigerators, washing machines, home security systems, coffeemakers… anything that can be improved with microchips. The Internet, however, has always been a network linking things (mostly computers) together.
The notion that every object we have needs to have an IP address and be reachable over the Internet is a foolish one. There are extremely serious security, privacy, and energy ramifications involved with turning trillions of objects into Internet-capable devices. And we ought to be discussing those ramifications, framed around the question: Do we really want or need an Internet with trillions of connected objects?
PHYSICALITY — Talking heads on ESPN and other networks seem obsessed with this word, which refers to the state or quality of being physical. Consider this recent Fox Sports headline: Physicality, attitude changed Packers defense during rise in NFL rankings. It sorely needs a rest… as do all of the bodies of the gridiron players who are finishing up their 2014 high school, college, or pro seasons.
PICK-SIX — Another overused, made up phrase that has entered the sports lexicon. Are color commentators and analysts really so lazy they can’t just say interception returned for a touchdown?
BOOTS ON THE GROUND — This one was heard a lot this year, especially towards the end of summer, as President Obama announced that the United States would carry out airstrikes against Islamic State, but would not put boots on the ground. What’s wrong with just saying deploy troops? Incidentally, on the ground was banished by LSSU in 2003 due to overuse in the mass media. One of the nominators pointed out that humans live on the ground, not suspended in the air or hundreds of fathoms beneath the surface of the ocean.
SEND A MESSAGE — An increasingly abused euphemism for taking some sort of action, like voting in an election. Plenty of emails generated by campaigns this past election season vaguely urged recipients to send a message to the opposition by clicking a link to sign a petition or give money. Organizations and campaigns would be better served by being open with their supporters about the point of their calls to action. It’d be refreshing to see an email that admitted that the primary purpose of asking people to sign on to a petition was not to send a message, but rather to grow the organization’s email list.
What words would you like to see banished that aren’t on this year’s list – or the Master List? Let us know in the comments. And Happy New Year!