NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate provides the Northwest Progressive Institute's uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Thursday, March 6th, 2014

Mark Miloscia launches Senate campaign as a Republican — but he’s still a Democratic PCO

Last night, we report­ed here on the NPI Advo­cate that ex-Demo­c­ra­t­ic State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Mark Mlos­cia had filed paper­work to chal­lenge his  for­mer col­league Tracey Eide for state Sen­ate… as a Republican.

This morn­ing, Milos­cia offi­cial­ly launched his cam­paign and announced endorse­ments from State Repub­li­can Par­ty Chair Susan Hutchi­son, King Coun­ty Repub­li­can Chair Lori Soete­lo, unsuc­cess­ful guber­na­to­r­i­al and sen­a­to­r­i­al can­di­date Dino Rossi, and Repub­li­can leg­is­la­tors Lin­da Kochmar and Bruce Dammeier.

In his news release, he bor­rowed from the Repub­li­can play­book to attack Eide, who has rep­re­sent­ed the dis­trict since 1998, claim­ing, “Sen­a­tor Eide and I have very dif­fer­ent vot­ing records… I opposed reck­less spend­ing and tax increas­es while Sen­a­tor Eide sup­port­ed them. I sup­port­ed inno­v­a­tive approach­es to improv­ing our schools, while Sen­a­tor Eide opposed them and cut funding.”

(Milos­cia did not elab­o­rate, or cite any spe­cif­ic roll call votes).

Milos­cia also expressed con­fi­dence his defec­tion to the Repub­li­can Par­ty would not neg­a­tive­ly impact his rep­u­ta­tion in the dis­trict or harm his credibility.

“Our area votes for the best per­son, not the par­ty,” he argued. “They want some­one who will stand up for jobs, for schools, for work­ing peo­ple, and for the least among us, regard­less of party.”

That’s actu­al­ly a false dichoto­my. The truth is, Wash­ing­to­ni­ans from Neah Bay to Clark­ston cast their votes based on who they iden­ti­fy with. It isn’t about the best per­son or the par­ty. It is about authen­tic­i­ty. Authen­tic­i­ty mat­ters in politics.

A stel­lar Munic­i­pal League rat­ing and impres­sive qual­i­fi­ca­tions don’t guar­an­tee a win. Qual­i­fi­ca­tions and par­ty asso­ci­a­tion each mat­ter in a race, but in the end, when vot­ers are decid­ing who to sup­port, it comes down to authen­tic­i­ty and trust.

If Milos­cia real­ly believed that par­ty asso­ci­a­tion does­n’t mat­ter and that the peo­ple he is run­ning to rep­re­sent will sup­port him regard­less of which par­ty he iden­ti­fies with, he’d be run­ning as an inde­pen­dent, sans par­ty label.

But he’s run­ning as a Repub­li­can because he wants the sup­port of the Repub­li­can Par­ty… espe­cial­ly the mon­ey. And the Repub­li­cans want his vote so they can main­tain con­trol of the Wash­ing­ton State Senate.

Democ­rats say there’s noth­ing noble about what Milos­cia is doing.

“Today, Mark Milos­cia put his own needs above those of 30th Dis­trict res­i­dents by announc­ing that he will switch par­ties and run as a Repub­li­can for State Sen­ate,” said new Wash­ing­ton State Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty Chair Jax­on Ravens.

“With his last-place fin­ish in the race for State Audi­tor in 2012, Milos­cia is upset that the vot­ers of Wash­ing­ton State chose not to give him a promotion.”

“He saw that he wasn’t advanc­ing fast enough as a Demo­c­rat, and he also saw how Rod­ney Tom has been reward­ed for vot­ing with Repub­li­cans in the State Sen­ate. By switch­ing par­ties, Mark Milos­cia is hop­ing that he will gain a faster path to pow­er like Rod­ney Tom. We are proud to sup­port Sen­a­tor Tracey Eide, and we are con­fi­dent that 30th Dis­trict res­i­dents will return her to the State Senate.”

Milos­cia has evi­dent­ly been plot­ting his run against Eide for some time, as evi­denced by the endorse­ments that he announced today. Time­stamps show he began post­ing con­tent to his new cam­paign web­site sev­er­al days ago. It’s unclear when exact­ly Milos­cia reached a deal with Repub­li­cans to run against Eide, but today’s announce­ment was seem­ing­ly in the works for a while.

This much we do know: Milos­cia has yet to for­mal­ly resign from the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty as the precinct com­mit­tee offi­cer for FED 30–3056.

Though he fin­ished in last place for state audi­tor on the August 2012 bal­lot, he was cho­sen in the same elec­tion by his Demo­c­ra­t­ic neigh­bors to rep­re­sent them on the King Coun­ty Demo­c­ra­t­ic Cen­tral Com­mit­tee (KCDCC) as their PCO.

The 30th Dis­trict Democ­rats tell NPI they have not received a let­ter of res­ig­na­tion from Mark Milos­cia. Last night at its March gen­er­al meet­ing, after hav­ing learned that Milos­cia had filed paper­work to chal­lenge Tracey Eide as a Repub­li­can, the orga­ni­za­tion vot­ed to direct Chair Tim Burns to request Milos­ci­a’s resignation.

Until Milos­cia resigns, the par­ty can­not replace him; there is no legal avenue for a polit­i­cal par­ty to expel a precinct com­mit­tee officer.

The 30th’s action should not have been nec­es­sary. When Mark Milos­cia decid­ed to join the Repub­li­can Par­ty, he ought to have noti­fied all of his Demo­c­ra­t­ic friends — espe­cial­ly those who stuck their necks out for him when he ran for audi­tor — and resigned his posi­tion with­in the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty. But he didn’t.

And when Demo­c­ra­t­ic activists in the 30th called to inquire about his plans, par­tic­u­lar­ly after the Fed­er­al Way Mir­ror ran a col­umn spec­u­lat­ing about his inten­tions, he left them hang­ing, choos­ing not to return calls or answer messages.

Duplic­i­ty is not becom­ing of a per­son who wish­es to serve the peo­ple of Wash­ing­ton as an elect­ed offi­cial. Mark Milos­cia should imme­di­ate­ly hand in his res­ig­na­tion as a Demo­c­ra­t­ic precinct com­mit­tee offi­cer and muster the courage to explain his defec­tion to his Demo­c­ra­t­ic friends.

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation

    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation

One Comment

  1. The Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty needs to revoke his access to the par­ty vot­er file imme­di­ate­ly, he should not be able to use Demo­c­ra­t­ic resources when run­ning as a Republican. 

    Mark, you are as bad as Rod­ney and Tim… Could­n’t get elect­ed as a Demo­c­rat, so you’re switch­ing par­ties. How wishy-washy is that? Not a trait I like in my elect­ed officials.

    # by Patti Dailey :: March 7th, 2014 at 11:15 AM
  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: