Though most of Wash­ing­ton’s thir­ty-nine coun­ties are break­ing strong­ly against I‑517, nowhere is the out­come more lop­sided than in King Coun­ty, which has vot­ed down most of Tim Eyman’s ini­tia­tives over the years.

Vot­ers in King are defeat­ing I‑517 by an enor­mous mar­gin. In fact, the gap between the yes vote and the no vote is actu­al­ly larg­er than the yes vote.

And this is despite an extreme­ly favor­able bal­lot title.

As of last night, 30.88% of votes tal­lied and report­ed in King Coun­ty were in favor of I‑517, while a whop­ping 69.12% were opposed. If late-arriv­ing bal­lots break even hard­er against I‑517, we could see the no vote climb above sev­en­ty percent.

But even if that does­n’t hap­pen, 69.12% is already a record. The pre­vi­ous high-water mark for a vote against an Eyman ini­tia­tive in King Coun­ty was set four years ago, in 2009, when 68.60% of vot­ers opposed Eyman’s I‑1033. That vote sur­passed the pre­vi­ous record of 67.05%, set in 2004 against Eyman’s I‑892.

It would real­ly be some­thing if we could get to 70% or above, and knock sup­port for I‑517 down into the high twen­ties. That’s some­thing I know I’d like to see.

King Coun­ty’s neigh­bors Pierce and Sno­homish are also turn­ing I‑517 down by healthy mar­gins. 62.26% of Sno­homish vot­ers are reject­ing I‑517, while 59.65% of Pierce vot­ers are doing the same. With King, Pierce, and Sno­homish all aligned, I‑517 is going down in flames. Every oth­er key swing coun­ty is also turn­ing I‑517 down, even Clark Coun­ty, which often exhibits a lib­er­tar­i­an streak.

Rur­al coun­ties, how­ev­er, are split on I‑517.

Many are firm­ly against, just like their urban and sub­ur­ban cousins. But some are for. It’s a fas­ci­nat­ing list, con­sist­ing of Wahki­akim, Cowlitz, Okanogan, Yaki­ma, Klick­i­tat, Grant, Asotin, Fer­ry, Stevens, and Pend Oreille.

With the excep­tion of Yaki­ma, all of these coun­ties are sparse­ly pop­u­lat­ed, and each have few­er inhab­i­tants than one small city in King Coun­ty, so they are not impact­ing the out­come. The pop­u­lous coun­ties of east­ern Wash­ing­ton are all against I‑517.

With the excep­tion of the afore­men­tioned I‑892 and I‑1033, no Eyman ini­tia­tive has ever received this kind of shel­lack­ing. It’s quite a vic­to­ry, and we are going to be savor­ing it for a long time, even as we work to get rid of Tim Eyman’s push polls and orga­nize oppo­si­tion to any schemes he tries to qual­i­fy for the 2014 ballot.

About the author

Andrew Villeneuve is the founder and executive director of the Northwest Progressive Institute, as well as the founder of NPI's sibling, the Northwest Progressive Foundation. He has worked to advance progressive causes for over two decades as a strategist, speaker, author, and organizer. Andrew is also a cybersecurity expert, a veteran facilitator, a delegate to the Washington State Democratic Central Committee, and a member of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps.

Adjacent posts