Adjacent posts
Ideas for what to read next
Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation
Thank you for reading The Cascadia Advocate, the Northwest Progressive Institute’s journal of world, national, and local politics.
Founded in March of 2004, The Cascadia Advocate has been helping people throughout the Pacific Northwest and beyond make sense of current events with rigorous analysis and thought-provoking commentary for more than fifteen years. The Cascadia Advocate is funded by readers like you and trusted sponsors. We don’t run ads or publish content in exchange for money.
Help us keep The Cascadia Advocate editorially independent and freely available to all by becoming a member of the Northwest Progressive Institute today. Or make a donation to sustain our essential research and advocacy journalism.
Your contribution will allow us to continue bringing you features like Last Week In Congress, live coverage of events like Netroots Nation or the Democratic National Convention, and reviews of books and documentary films.
Sunday, September 9th, 2012
Republicans mock Jay Inslee for supporting companies that are succeeding
Continuing to position themselves as the unapologetic opponents of any policy direction with the word “clean” in it (clean energy, clean elections), the Republican Party has needled Democrtic gubernatorial candidate Jay Inslee for envisioning a clean energy economy for Washington and for supporting clean energy in his 2008 book, Apollo’s Fire. According to them, every eco-friendly company Inslee singled out in his book has failed.
It just so happens, however (big surprise here!) that it’s just not true. Today, the Seattle Times ran an article examining Republicans’ criticism:
It turns out two are doing just fine, and one’s facing trouble because their federal funding been cut. When an industry is in its infancy, it’s not uncommon to see startups fail. That makes public sector support even more important for industries we value as a society. Despite attacks intended to shift public opinion against clean energy, eighty-three percent of Americans support the development of renewable energy. Throughout our history, we’ve seen important industries get started with public sector support and then grow into American success stories. Clean energy startups have the potential to simultaneously improve our economic security and reduce our environmental footprint.
Besides, it’s not like the government isn’t already “picking winners and losers”. Republicans, including Rob McKenna, often use this line to excuse their unwillingness to do anything substantial to help propel us towards a green energy revolution. Oil and gas companies receive about $41 billion annually in subsidies from the federal government. Different estimates exist on the exact cost of our oil consumption, with some estimates including the costs of protecting our oil transport system. President Obama has called to end some of these subsidies, but with the current Congress, it’s unlikely anything will happen.
Energy is something all firms and households needs. Energy powers our homes, our businesses, and keeps the economy moving. Transitioning to renewable energy will help our society, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, create jobs, and position the U.S. for a sustainable future. We have a stake in making sure that this transition happens. In the future though, we should be able to hope that the winner isn’t a holdover from the previous century.
# Written by Patrick Stickney :: 10:00 PM
Categories: Economic Security, Elections, Our Environment, Policy Topics
Tags: Energy & Power, WA-Gov
Comments and pings are currently closed.