NPI's Cascadia Advocate

Offering commentary and analysis from Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's uplifting perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Tuesday, August 21st, 2012

One of six proposed coal terminals in Washington and Oregon abandoned

Ask a polit­i­cal orga­niz­er in What­com Coun­ty, and it trends that they will tell you about how often they hear vot­ers ask about the pro­posed coal ter­mi­nal at Cher­ry Point, right out­side of Belling­ham. They get frus­trat­ed. Train tracks cut right through Belling­ham, and run along next to local busi­ness­es. Sit for a few hours at a Belling­ham restaurant/brewery, and mul­ti­ple trains will come by to sti­fle con­ver­sa­tion in the time it takes for the train to go about their self-assured route. 

We have already cov­ered some of the signs of oppo­si­tion to the pro­posed coal ter­mi­nal. Belling­ham isn’t alone in its oppo­si­tion, and many cities have expressed oppo­si­tion or con­cern, includ­ing Seat­tle. This oppo­si­tion has come before the agen­cies con­duct­ing the study about the impacts of the coal ter­mi­nal have even fig­ured out what exact­ly they’re going to be study­ing yet. But Cher­ry Point isn’t the only coal ter­mi­nal pro­posed. Six coal ter­mi­nals have been pro­posed in Wash­ing­ton and Ore­gon.

At least, until last week. 

Last Tues­day, Flori­da-based com­pa­ny Rail­Amer­i­ca announced that it was no longer pur­su­ing a coal export ter­mi­nal in Grays Har­bor. The rea­son­ing giv­en was that anoth­er com­pa­ny was inter­est­ed in ship­ping some­thing oth­er than coal, and this oper­a­tion would actu­al­ly start run­ning quick­er than the time it would take to build a coal ter­mi­nal. The deci­sion gives greater cre­dence to the rea­son­ing that it might bet­ter eco­nom­i­cal­ly for com­pa­nies to ship inven­to­ry oth­er than small, black rocks that con­tribute to cli­mate change. 

Rail­Amer­i­ca giv­ing up on the Grays Har­bor ter­mi­nal is a cause for cel­e­bra­tion for the those who have tak­en a stand against coal. Show­ing that there are bet­ter and faster ways to gen­er­ate eco­nom­ic activ­i­ty in the region will help sway those who believe that export­ing coal is the only way to cre­ate jobs.

One down, five to go. Five coal ter­mi­nals is still a lot to wor­ry about. 

Adjacent posts

  • Enjoyed what you just read? Make a donation

    Thank you for read­ing The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate, the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute’s jour­nal of world, nation­al, and local politics.

    Found­ed in March of 2004, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate has been help­ing peo­ple through­out the Pacif­ic North­west and beyond make sense of cur­rent events with rig­or­ous analy­sis and thought-pro­vok­ing com­men­tary for more than fif­teen years. The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate is fund­ed by read­ers like you and trust­ed spon­sors. We don’t run ads or pub­lish con­tent in exchange for money.

    Help us keep The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate edi­to­ri­al­ly inde­pen­dent and freely avail­able to all by becom­ing a mem­ber of the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute today. Or make a dona­tion to sus­tain our essen­tial research and advo­ca­cy journalism.

    Your con­tri­bu­tion will allow us to con­tin­ue bring­ing you fea­tures like Last Week In Con­gress, live cov­er­age of events like Net­roots Nation or the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Con­ven­tion, and reviews of books and doc­u­men­tary films.

    Become an NPI mem­ber Make a one-time donation

One Ping

  1. […] Coal: “Last Tues­day, FL-based com­pa­ny Rail­Amer­i­ca announced that it was no longer pur­su­ing a coal export ter­mi­nal in Grays Har­bor. One down, five to go. Five coal ter­mi­nals is still a lot to worry […]

    Ping from Links 8/23/12 « naked capitalism :: August 22nd, 2012 at 11:42 PM
  • NPI’s essential research and advocacy is sponsored by: