PENGIN9: I don’t get why we need to have laws for who can drive a taxi. In my humble opinion, if you’re brave enough to have a stranger pick you up; it’s all on you. [A] registered taxi will be more expensive, but presumably safer.
BIG WANG: Because having unsafe taxi drivers and cars on the road is a danger to the greater public, not just the rider? Because having unlicensed and unregulated taxis prey on tourists and foreigners gives off a bad image for the country and the city? Because having too many taxis around tourist and rider hotspots increase overall congestion? Because allowing a company to reap the revenue for a taxi business without complying with regulations sets a bad precedence? People who are dead set against taxi regulations have been living in (highly regulated) first-world for too long.
— from the comment thread on the Ars Technica story Lyft reverses under legal pressure, cancels Friday night New York launch.
"A hot ocean provides the energy hurricanes need to grow—and can limit the cooling that…
Watch President Biden's remarks from the White House condemning the Supreme Court's decision in Trump…
Jon Stewart digs into the right wing's fearmongering obsession: crime in big cities.
"Russ Vought, the former president’s budget director, is laying the groundwork for a broad expansion…
"Intense heat waves in recent years offer a stark warning of what’s at stake for…
The fallout from Dobbs has convinced some on the religious right that opposing the freedom…