On behalf of the team at here at the North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute, I’m pleased to announce this evening that we have launched BallotGuide.info, a new microsite designed to help pro­gres­sive vot­ers nav­i­gate the many mea­sures on the 2013 gen­er­al elec­tion bal­lot in Wash­ing­ton State.

(Microsites, for those who don’t speak tech, are very small stand­alone web­sites that con­sist of either a sin­gle web page or a few web pages. BallotGuide.info is extreme­ly sim­ple — it is a sin­gle web page at its own domain).

Bal­lot­Guide was cre­at­ed to demys­ti­fy vot­ing on bal­lot mea­sures. Mea­sures are rep­re­sent­ed on the pieces of paper we do our vot­ing on as bal­lot titles (or bal­lot ques­tions, if you like). These bal­lot titles, typ­i­cal­ly writ­ten by the Attor­ney Gen­er­al’s office, are some­times lack­ing con­text or even devoid of context.

For exam­ple, Ini­tia­tive 517, which NPI’s Per­ma­nent Defense has been fight­ing for months, is a self-serv­ing Tim Eyman ini­tia­tive that vio­lates free speech rights and prop­er­ty rights. It’s opposed by a diverse coali­tion of busi­ness­es, labor unions, sports teams like the Sea­hawks and Sounders, pro­gres­sive orga­ni­za­tions like NPI and con­ser­v­a­tive orga­ni­za­tions like the Main­stream Republicans.

But you would­n’t know that from read­ing Ini­tia­tive 517’s bal­lot title.

Sim­i­lar­ly, the back­sto­ry on the five “advi­so­ry votes” that are on our bal­lots below the two ini­tia­tives is miss­ing. The lan­guage of the advi­so­ry vote ques­tions is dic­tat­ed by Tim Eyman’s Ini­tia­tive 960, as are the answers (“Repealed” and “Main­tained”). The lan­guage is one-sided and large­ly with­out con­text. Nowhere is it explained that the advi­so­ry votes are non­bind­ing and mean­ing­less, or that the rev­enue increas­es in ques­tion were already passed by the Leg­is­la­ture as part of the state bud­get, or that the advi­so­ry votes are required by a Tim Eyman initiative.

BallotGuide.info seeks to mit­i­gate this prob­lem by pro­vid­ing a marked-up exam­ple bal­lot. Over­laid notes on red text pro­vide use­ful con­text, while arrows point to the cor­rect ovals that a pro­gres­sive vot­er should fill in. To the right of the exam­ple bal­lot are NPI’s rec­om­men­da­tions, with even longer expla­na­tions and links to the rel­e­vant cam­paign web­sites (like Yes on 522 and No on I‑517).

At the bot­tom are links to addi­tion­al resources a pro­gres­sive vot­er can make use of while fill­ing out his or her bal­lot. We don’t endorse can­di­dates or do elec­tion­eer­ing for or against can­di­dates; we only cov­er con­tests for elect­ed office through our pub­li­ca­tions, includ­ing The Advo­cate. But Fuse Wash­ing­ton main­tains a pro­gres­sive voter’s guide and the Wash­ing­ton State Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty has an endorse­ments find­er. We’ve includ­ed links to both of those tools on BallotGuide.info.

We encour­age you to check out BallotGuide.info and share it with friends, fam­i­ly, and neigh­bors. Help oth­ers cast an informed vote in 2013.

About the author

Andrew Villeneuve is the founder and executive director of the Northwest Progressive Institute, as well as the founder of NPI's sibling, the Northwest Progressive Foundation. He has worked to advance progressive causes for over two decades as a strategist, speaker, author, and organizer. Andrew is also a cybersecurity expert, a veteran facilitator, a delegate to the Washington State Democratic Central Committee, and a member of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps.

Adjacent posts

One reply on “NPI launches BallotGuide.info, a microsite that demystifies ballot measures”

  1. Great job, NPI! Thanks for help­ing edu­cate the vot­ers. What a cool idea… show peo­ple how to vote pro­gres­sive­ly, don’t just tell them. 

Comments are closed.