Peo­ple from who care about kids are cel­e­brat­ing Thursday’s Wash­ing­ton Supreme Court rul­ing strik­ing down the pro­vi­sion at the heart of Tim Eyman’s I‑601 clones. Par­ents, teach­ers and oth­er advo­cates for great pub­lic schools agree that sim­ply cut­ting fund­ing from oth­er vital pub­lic ser­vices and real­lo­cat­ing the mon­ey to edu­ca­tion — the only option on the table before Thursday’s rul­ing — will nev­er ensure that we are meet­ing our para­mount duty as a state.

To pro­vide the $1.4 bil­lion need­ed this bien­ni­um to meet the state Supreme Court’s man­date to fund K‑12 edu­ca­tion, Wash­ing­ton needs to raise more revenue.

The Wash­ing­ton State PTA wel­comed the rul­ing. WSPTA is the largest vol­un­teer orga­ni­za­tion in the state, with over 140,000 mem­bers, both Democ­rats and Repub­li­cans. Mem­bers of both par­ties can see that we have a prob­lem: Wash­ing­ton con­sis­tent­ly ranks at the bot­tom nation­al­ly in per pupil spend­ing rel­a­tive to the income of state res­i­dents. From WSPTA:

The asso­ci­a­tion wel­comes the state Supreme Court rul­ing this week that strikes down the two-thirds major­i­ty require­ment for state rev­enue increas­es. This rul­ing gives pol­i­cy­mak­ers the flex­i­bil­i­ty they need to make prac­ti­cal and bal­anced choic­es for children.

The asso­ci­a­tion also oppos­es SJR 8205, which seeks to embed the two-thirds require­ment into the state constitution.

The inabil­i­ty of leg­is­la­tors to effec­tive­ly and effi­cient­ly deal with the sig­nif­i­cant under­fund­ing of our K‑12 edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem is hurt­ing our chil­dren. This fall, our asso­ci­a­tion vot­ed to sup­port addi­tion­al rev­enue to pay for children’s edu­ca­tion and pro­grams that keep them healthy and safe.

The League of Edu­ca­tion Vot­ers was the lead plain­tiff in the case and we thank them for fight­ing in court for our kids. The League is ready for the leg­is­la­ture to seize this oppor­tu­ni­ty and bet­ter fund our schools:

LEV and its part­ners chal­lenged the law in court because it ham­strung our leg­is­la­tors’ efforts to uphold their para­mount duty to invest in the qual­i­ty pub­lic schools our chil­dren need to suc­ceed in life.  Our kids suf­fered at the hands of a small minor­i­ty of leg­is­la­tors who could veto any new rev­enue options for education.

This deci­sion comes at the per­fect time–our leg­is­la­tors are work­ing right now to devel­op a plan to ful­ly fund K‑12 edu­ca­tion. This rul­ing puts all options on the table. We all want what is best for our stu­dents, but year after year, thanks in part to Ini­tia­tive 1053, the leg­is­la­ture has not pro­vid­ed the fund­ing to pay for basic resources need to edu­cate our students.

The state teach­ers union has seen its mem­bers’ salaries shriv­el through years of state bud­get cuts. Teach­ers have also seen the impacts of reduced fund­ing in their schools and over­crowd­ed class­rooms: school librar­i­ans, nurs­es and coun­selors have van­ished, text­books are out­dat­ed and build­ings are under-main­tained. From Wash­ing­ton Edu­ca­tion Asso­ci­a­tion Pres­i­dent Mary Lindquist:

This lat­est Supreme Court rul­ing paves the way for the leg­is­la­ture to ful­ly fund K‑12 pub­lic schools as man­dat­ed by the Wash­ing­ton Con­sti­tu­tion and the Court’s ear­li­er McCleary deci­sion. We urge the House and the Sen­ate to increase fund­ing for our schools so we can begin to reduce over­crowd­ed class sizes and expand all-day kinder­garten. Our stu­dents’ future depends on it.

Thurs­day’s momen­tous Supreme Court deci­sion cre­at­ed an oppor­tu­ni­ty for the leg­is­la­ture. But will they use their new pow­er to pro­vide the high-qual­i­ty edu­ca­tion that our kids deserve, or will they be par­a­lyzed by their fear of “the vot­ers’ will?” We need to let our leg­is­la­tors know that we want them to act. Bring back the librar­i­ans, fix the leaks, buy the books, and ensure our teach­ers have the resources they need to help all of our kids real­ize their full poten­tial in life.

Adjacent posts