Offering frequent news and analysis from the majestic Evergreen State and beyond, The Cascadia Advocate is the Northwest Progressive Institute's unconventional perspective on world, national, and local politics.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The future is local: China and the trade deficit

In case you hadn't heard, President Obama is meeting with his holiness the Dalai Lama tomorrow. This is basically unavoidable: American presidents have a tradition of meeting with the Dalai Lama going back to the George Bush the Elder in 1990. Given the nature of these two men, I'm sure he's looking forward to it. But even if he wasn't, there's really no way he could avoid it.

China will certainly condemn the meeting. This, too, is basically unavoidable. Given China's occupation of Tibet and their territorial claims on that region, they have to or else they undermine their own position.

Talking heads across the cable spectrum are already wringing their hands that this may signal renewed difficulties in the U.S./China relationship.

To be honest, I could scarcely care less about China getting their collective panties all in a twist because the President wants to meet with Tibet's spiritual leader. Really, who cares?

Here's what I care about.

  • Fact: consumer spending accounts for the single largest share of the U.S. economy.

  • Fact: America has an un-sustainable trade deficit because we buy more stuff from foreign nations than we sell to them.

  • Fact: A ridiculous portion of that trade deficit comes from the American addiction to cheap crap manufactured in China.

  • Fact: This gives China the ability to buy U.S. Treasury notes, which they do in historically large quantities

  • This in turn gives the U.S. Treasury the ability to issue new debt for purposes such as helping the U.S. economy get out of recessions.



Like the one we're struggling through right now.

That's all great until China decides to start selling U.S. debt instead of buying it. Which, just the other day, it did. China signaled that it's going to be backing off on the amount of U.S. debt it holds, to the tune of three or four hundred billion dollars.

Why does this matter? Because the fact that China buys up a lot of our debt means it has leverage over our economy. China can use that leverage to help us or hurt us. Or they can do whatever the hell they want without regard to whether it helps us or hurts us.

That's pretty much what's happening, except right now it's hurting us. When the banking crisis hit back in 2008 and early 2009, suddenly the safest appearing investment in the world was U.S. Treasury notes. So China bought a lot of them. Now that things are a bit more stable and China wants cash to fuel their own economy, they're easing back on their U.S. Treasury holdings.

Fine for them, but bad for us. The net effect is that this makes it harder for the Treasury to issue new debt, which makes it harder to jump-start our struggling economy.

We have no one to blame but ourselves. We--the great American Shopper--are the ones who created this gigantic trade deficit. We're the ones who sent so many dollars, so much of our economic power, to China in exchange for cheap floor lamps, disposable consumer electronics, and plastic trinkets galore. We did that.

China will do what China will do, regardless of whether the President meets with the Dalai Lama, in response to what they feel best helps China. As it happens, we've created a situation where China helping China has the unfortunate side effect of kicking the U.S. economy while it's down.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the future is local.

If we ever want to have a safe, stable economy where our fates as Americans isn't impacted by what China decides to do for itself, then we have to unwind that whole series of causes and effects that have brought us to this precarious state.

We have to stop buying cheap crap from China and turn our trade deficit into a trade surplus. We have to bring manufacturing jobs back home by buying American, even if it costs a bit more. We have to stop sending the lion's share of our economic power to a country that is--however understandably--more concerned for its own fate than ours.

Comments:

Blogger Jie said...

Yeah, cheap crap? Then you are just crap yourself if you buy and use those stuffs.

So you expect the Chinese people to do all the hard work, and end up with more deficit in China?

Also, you do not want to sell your "good" stuffs to China because you think they will just steal technology from you. I cannot see how you can have the deficit resolved.

February 17, 2010 1:50 PM  
Blogger janet_bauer said...

Your comments are valid, so can you tell (1) the greedy bankers FIRST to return those bonuses back to the taxpayers ? (2) the congress and the president NOT to spend HUGE amount of military defense spending to wage TWO wars abroad ( I doubt this could ever happen, we are hijacked by Defense industry lobbyists (3) the unions to lower their wage-expectation to that OUR companies can remain COMPETITIVE first instead of shipping our jobs to India and China ? (4) the single-moms and unemployed to buy MORE expensive goods while Walmart's cheap Chinese products are just a stone-throw away and could sustain their lives living on government food-stamps ??

Answer these questions before bashing someone else for the problems created by our (1) Unions (2) Bankers (3) Wars (4) Ever bickering democratic Congress which hardly gets anything done without backdoor deals, a.k.a. corruption.

February 17, 2010 2:27 PM  

Post a Comment

By posting a comment, you agree to be bound by the Northwest Progressive Institute's Comments Policy, which may be updated at our discretion.

<< Home